Right now, the Whitman-Hanson Regional School District still does not have a budget, Superintendent of Schools Jeff Szymaniak said at the School Committee’s meeting on Wednesday, June 5.
He also responded to a rumor “floating around” – as well as the question of what happens if there is still no budget after Hanson’s special Town Meeting at 6:30 p.m., Monday, June 17.
“That’s a reality in our district, if we don’t have a budget by June 30, we now have to make some modifications, he said.
If the district has to report failure to reach a budget agreement by the new fiscal year on July 1, the Commissioner of Education will put the district on a 1/12 budget based on last year’s fiscal 2014 budget – at either the exact amount or over it.
“When the district went through the scenario in 2020, it was the exact amount for the month of July and, realistically for the School District, the month of July is not a fiscal crunch for us because our teachers are paid before they leave [in a fiscal ’24 scenario],” Szymaniak said. The next large pay period, under a fiscal 2024 budget is not until August.
But because it is about a $2.5 million deficit, Szymaniak must make sure, in the absence of a budget to prepare for the worst.
That means, if the district is still without a budget by August or September, he said he has to make sure the district has a plan to reduce the budget by $2.5 million – which is teachers.
“But, as I have reminded, if I have to Pink Slip, or RIF [Reduction in Force] teachers, I have to come up with 40 percent of their unemployment costs as of the day they are RIF’ed. So I have to look at the long game, and be prepared for a no-budget into August, September, October, November into December. In December, if I still don’t have a budget, the commissioner will give us a budget.”
That spending plan will be taken out of the towns’ hands and says, ‘This is your budget for the year,’” he said, as school starts up again in September.
“Looking at the numbers, he said [Whitman Finance Committee member Kathleen] Ottina was a little short on the number of RIFs that we’ll have to give out,], Szymaniak said. [See story page 11] The teachers’ contract says Reduction in Force letters should be out by May 30, if possible, and no later than June 30. Teachers leave for the summer on June 13 and Town Meeting is June 17.
“To try to avoid mass anxiety, because I’m optimistic that we’re going to pass a budget, because the School Committee has affirmed a budget without cuts,” he said. “We already know that.”
He said he has already crunched numbers and would try to get that information out to the staff by this week. The district had already posted six positions he’s wanted to fill from retirements and other such departures.
“But I’m not going to hire anybody if I don’t have a budget, so that reduces the RIF letters by six,” he said. A second tier of 26 WHEA members two central office and three district employees would receive RIFs because he has to come up with $3.3 million in cuts to cover the $2.5 million that might be real on a 1/12 budget, because of unemployment costs.
In that number, he took $540,000 [which is not set in stone, he stressed], asking the School Committee to not support varsity and sub-varsity sports and extracurriculars, which cost the district $538,000.
“That’s seven, eight or nine teachers that I don’t want to RIF at this point,” he said. “This is all hypothetical unless we don’t have a budget. But it could be real in August, if we don’t.”
He said he would not make the cuts unless the district ends up without a budget on June 17.
“It’s imperative for parents … to go to the meeting and talk,” he said. “I’m not telling you how to vote. Go to the meeting, at least and hear.”
If there is no budget by the end of the June 17 meeting, Szymaniak and Assistant Superintendent George Ferro will be sending out Reduction in Force letters on the morning of Tuesday, June 18.
“I don’t know where they are coming from,” he said, “But they are coming from classrooms, they’re coming from related arts, and it’s our first- and second-year staff members, or people that might even be a little bit more [veteran] if they’re a district-wide employee.”
Only staff in state-mandated roles would be safe from cuts.
Communicating cuts
“I’m trying to be as honest with the committee as possible, without [causing] as much fear to our staff members, but this is a reality if we push into late August,” he said.
Whitman has already voted an assessment and would not have to act again unless the committee decided to increase the assessment. If a super-Town Meeting, a session with both communities, is required, a majority vote would pass a budget, which could be in place as early as mid-July.
“July, I can cover money, but if we go into the middle of August because the towns voted the budget down, the commissioner takes over and then it could come back to the School Committee again,” Szymaniak said. “We keep doing that until we have a budget, or until the commissioner says, ‘You’re not where you should be,’ and he just assesses a budget to the regional school district.”
By law the commissioner’s options are to increase what was asked for by the committee.
Committee member Glen DiGravio said he is concerned about how badly a 1/12 budget could affect the students.
“If it goes in, we’ve got a problem,” Szymaniak said. “Because as people start leaving, it becomes problematic.” He said he is looking at options that are least impactful to the staff.
Information on the staff cuts is being supplied to the Hanson Select Board for their information and to distribute to voters.
“People need to know that,” DiGravio said. “These kids matter, and they don’t get a vote, either.”
DiGravio also asked if athletics could be cut completely, which Szymaniak said was possible, although he doesn’t want to have to.
“But it’s an option – people need to know that, too.” DiGravio said.
“This is not a reduction of the school district’s budget,” Szymaniak said, “I’m just won’t have a budget, so I can’t, as the superintendent, say, ‘I’m going to cut eight classroom teachers and have a football team.’ … It’s not a scare tactic.”
Member Dawn Byers said she wants to make clear what Hanson’s assessment will be – $14,974,735 – noting that if the motion at Hanson’s special Town Meeting is the number is to approve the amount presented at the May 6 Town Meeting, that is not the number the School Committee voted.
“It’s important to know what number is being voted on,” she said, noting that the School Committee made the number workable.
Member Fred Small moved that Szymaniak write a letter to Hanson officials clarifying the exact amounts to be included on the warrant and to get back to him in a timely manner.
Szymaniak vs
the rumor mill
As for the rumor – one of the questions he was asked at that meeting were about hiring 31 people with one-time money – was something he said needed to be clarified.
He met with the Hanson Select Board last month, and while they did not agree on a few things, an understanding of transportation reimbursement, of special education reimbursement costs, came up.
“I wasn’t planning on talking,” he said, but Town Administrator Lisa Green raised the opportunity to ask him questions. Hires with the use of ARPA funds was also raised at the meeting.
“Just because we have in and outs, doesn’t mean I’m adding positions,” he said. “Teachers have been in and out since 2021 – maternities, resignations, non-renewals, retirements – positions that have been created are the additional ones, but even through those additions, I’ve subtracted other ones.”
Over the course of the Elementary and Secondary School Relief (ESSER) Act, which Szymaniak said was a godsend in some respects, the funds became a curse as well.
“You’re handed a lot of money with specifications around it, how do you spend it without making it the fiscal cliff that we’ve spoken to?” he said. “And I knew, if I went home and turned back $2.5 million to the state or the fed because I couldn’t spend it, this committee or the members of the town would say, ‘You had $2.5 million to spend and you didn’t spend it?’ ‘:How can you do that?’”
He argued that the school district made really effective, efficient decisions to benefit the students. Some of those decisions were in the line of interventionists and English-language learning support.
Since 2021, the district began by hiring four interventionists, but that only had an impact of 2.5 positions funded in the budget, because they reallocated people within the district to fill those positions, he explained. An elementary education coordinator was added and has since left, with the district refurbishing the position as salary to a human resource director, which the school district has needed for years. At the same time the elementary ed coordinator position was reconfigured into a Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) and equity.
Five building-level math interventionists were also hired.
“A lot of these folks were teachers, who went into these roles, so we hired teachers on top of that,” he said. “That’s not a plus-10, that’s a plus-five.”
Another nurse was hired to address real needs, especially pre- and post- COVID, especially in the preschool and high school. There had been only one nurse at the high school and a nurse that had been promised after the closing of the Maquan School had never been hired.
A district-wide family liaison was also hired and has been a valuable member of the administrative team with the growing student population who speak another language. Six English-language staff members – both teachers and tutors – to ensure the schools are providing the increased English-language learners that is required by law.
Szymaniak referred to the English-language learning program to quash an accompanying rumor.
“We do not house migrants in Whitman,” he said. “These are our students. They live in our communities, they are not coming in from the state. It’s not from the governor. These are our students. People have asked, because I’ve seen it on social media,”
He said the population of non-English-speaking students has grown incrementally since 2021.
“We need to service students by law, and it’s the right thing to do.”
Committee member Rosemary Connolly stressed that Szymaniak had 15 positions he legally had to full in the district, but he had done so with only 11 additional positions.
“I think that’s pretty remarkable,” she said. “You, essentially, worked your numbers quite well.”
Hanson Committee member Kara Moser also pointed out that, when pink slips go out to staff is it is needed to balance the budget, it will not include the newer hires if they are among the state mandated positions in the schools.
“If people philosophically disagree with an added position on this list, voting it down is not eliminating that position,” she said.
Byers asked about the title interventionist.
“That’s sort of a modern-day tutor – a reading tutor/specialist, a math tutor/specialist, is that correct?” she asked.
Szymaniak said they are certified teachers. Before 2018 the district had reading specialists, they are now called interventionists, and added math to that service.
“People hear this new term and they wonder if this is just a result of COVID again, so we’re not in COVID anymore, so we don’t need this,” Byers said. “We’re now presenting an educational budget that includes what we should have had, pre-COVID.”
Szymaniak said it is sometimes difficult to fulfill state mandates, especially when they are unfunded, but credited the School Committee and the towns with helping to support district curriculum, such as all-day kindergarten, that should have been offered about 15 years ago.
Back on the topic of added district staff, he said the two high school music teachers who retired last year have been replaced by three – all funded by the salaries of the retired teachers. An afterschool coordinator hire was grant-funded.
Also, an occupational therapist was hired to aid all district students in need of the services that had been contracted out.
“Really, It’s a total of 18 new positions,” he said.
In fiscal 2025, the district has lost seven positions – including former facilities director Ernest Sandland, who retired, and a groundskeeper and was not hired – make a total of 11 new positions brought on district-wide, “all of whom are benefitting our students and that’s what you approved and are supporting going into this fiscal non-budget, right now, in the town of Hanson,” Szymaniak said.
“There might have been 31 – there might have been 40 people that have revolved through the district since 2012 – paraprofessionals are fluid,” Szymaniak said. “Special education paraprofessionals, I don’t count because [if] I have a student that needs a one-to-one, that’s an add, we don’t have a choice for that.”
He also hired a preschool teacher because the class for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) room was “busting at the seams” with pupils.
“That’s not a wish, that’s a need,” he said.
The state gave the district three rounds of ESSER money since 2021.
“We knew there was going to be a cliff [and] we worked in our office to try to massage the budget as best we could to make sure there wasn’t a $2.5 million end date, like some districts,” Szymaniak said, mentioning that they knew they would come up with a deficit this year, as they have.
Chair Beth Stafford said the number of “new hires” had started out at 35.
“We saw the result of doing this,” she said noting that district test scores are now “even better than before COVID. That’s our job here, the improvement of the kids.”
Vice Chair Hillary Kniffen said an error on the DESE website has people drawing incorrect class size information, as the site includes all personnel, with a degree in education to arrive at that number.
“If you are not in education – this is going to sound bad – but, you can’t go on the DESE website and think they know what information they’re trying to get across,” she said.
Szymaniak pointed to politics.
“If you actually showed 30:1 ratios in a school district, people would be all over the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education for more state funding for schools,” he said.
New bench at Whitman Town Hall honors memory of Marie Lailer
Friends and family of Marie Lailer gathered on the front lawn of the Town Hall recently for the dedication of a newly planted tree (donated by the Historical Commission and Friends of the Park) and memorial bench (donated by the Lailer family) in honor of longtime Historical Commission Chair Marie Lailer who passed away suddenly in December 2022. The event was hosted by the Whitman Historical Commission.
Marie began her service on the Historical Commission as an Associate Member in 2010. She became a fulltime member the following year and Chair in 2013. She served in that capacity until her untimely death in 2022. Among Marie’s many achievements was shepherding the 2015 Local Inventories and Surveys of Historic Properties for the town of Whitman which was funded by a grant from the Massachusetts Historical Commission. Her other major pursuit was assisting the Whitman Historical Society to find a permanent home for the Whitman Museum so all could enjoy the rich history that Whitman has to offer.
The Historical Commission hopes that the bench and tree serve to remind people as they pass by of Marie’s dedication to Whitman and her passion for the abundant history which it holds.
What the TM votes will mean
HANSON – The outcome of Hanson’s special Town Meeting on June 17 will hinge on how effectively the sole article is explained to voters as to exactly what “yes” and “no” votes mean, and will do, regarding the fiscal 2025 budget and the W-H school assessment’s effect on it.
Select Board, in an emergency meeting on Thursday, May 30 voted final approval of the warrant article, contingent on minor language changes being made, for the June 17 special Town Meeting Town Administrator Lisa Green attended the session remotely via phone.
A lack of clarity, particularly centering on the explanation of the article which allows voters to have another conversation about the fiscal 2025 budget, which passed May 6, but after the May 18 Town Election result shooting down the Proposition 2 ½ override, there remains a $350,212 budget that has already been established with the deficit, and asks them to examine an insert outlining cuts the Finance Committee is working to recommend. The third option would be the discussion of other amendments from the floor.
“The article itself is just a recitation of what we already have, and what we have every year as the budget item in the warrant,” Select Board Chair Laura FitzGerald-Kemmett said.
“If they vote no on this article, it means we do not reconsider the budget, we do not talk about it anymore and then we have a $350,000 shortfall that we have to figure out on our side how to resolve and it goes back to the School Committee for a third assessment and a super Town Meeting,” Board member Joe Weeks said. “I understand that it’s frustrating to talk about this now, but I’m telling you right now, there’s a whole bunch of people saying ‘I’m voting no for this because they think no means [it rejects the assessment].”
“This is not clear,” Vice Chair Ann Rein said, agreeing with Weeks’ point. “People out there think no means no and it doesn’t. Voting yes means we stick with the budget as voted in May and they don’t get it.”
FitzGerald-Kemmett said people have to come not thinking what they want to vote against, but what they will vote for.
Both FitzGerald-Kemmett and Select Board Administrative Assistant Lynn McCowell reviewed the budget article and Town Counsel Kate Feodorff was asked to do the same and made some minor changes.
Noting her own suggestion at the last meeting that two warrant articles be used, FitzGerald-Kemmett said that after speaking to Feodoroff, who thought the approach would be more confusing to voters, it was decided that the article’s wording and an insert covering the board and Finance Committee’s recommendations, would “really be driving it and the way that it would be voted.”
Feodoroff, who joined the meeting late via Zoom, also “very strongly counselled” the Select Board that a single article was preferable to avoid confusion as to what voters would be asked to decide according to FitzGerald-Kemmett. Before she did join the meeting, FitzGerald-Kemmett suggested any tweaks to be made be done that night.
“We need to have this on lock-down so the warrant can be delivered by the constable tomorrow morning [Friday, May 31],” she said.
Member Ed Heal had already voiced concern over the final paragraph: “The purpose of this article is to deliberate on the budget as a whole to determine whether or not to ‘fully [missing word]’” and insert the word ‘fund,’ “the Whitman-Hanson regional School budget,” FitzGerald-Kemmett read. The board voted to make that change.
“I’m still kind of caught off-guard,” Weeks said, noting that on May 30, they discussed three options that do different things. “If we were to just vote ‘yes’ on this article, given that we have three options drastically different things. … I wish we just had something that says, a ‘yes vote does this.’”
He asked if the votes would cover two options.
FitzGerald-Kemmett said there would be just one vote.
“To approve the budget as it is, as it was voted at the last Town Meeting, and that is the way Mr. Kealy’s motion will be updated,” she said. “We are keeping the W-H regional school budget as the budget that was voted at the last Town Meeting.”
Heal asked whether it makes sense to declare it to be a yes vote.
“How do you get to a vote?” he asked. “How do you get to item one?”
“Through the motion,” FitzGerald-Kemmett said. “Mr. Kealy will read the motion.”
“How do you get to item one?” Heal asked.
“It’s through the motion,” FitzGerald-Kemmett replied. “If option one carries, there is no need for further discussion because we [would have] voted to stay the course. If option one doesn’t carry, then we go to Option two, which is the potential service cuts that will be outlined, but not necessarily recommended by us or the Finance Committee.”
To help clarify it further, Weeks said “If you vote ‘yes’ on this, then Option 1 is going to carry.”
FitzGerald-Kemmett said the article would not require multiple passes if Article 1 passes with the motion that the town will not back away from officials’ stance that they will only fund what Town Meeting has already voted.
“In other words, we’re saying we’re not changing anything,” she said. “We had to get together. We had to present other options, but what we’re moving tonight is ‘stay the course, then there’s no further discussion needed, and then we adjourn.”
Feodoroff, joining the discussion said if Town Meeting does nothing than the budget is approved.
“Since they sent that assessment back, if we do nothing, then their budget is approved,” she added. “We have 45 days – use them … without having a source of funding, you become obligated legally to fund the whole budget. … So you have to do something.”
The failed override would have created additional revenue capacity, but since it failed, Feodoroff explained, officials need to bear in mind that a different group of people show up at Town Meeting and would be well within their rights to vote to fully fund the schools. The situation demands that it be counter-balanced with budget cuts.
The Finance Committee is meeting to determine where they would prefer those cuts should be made.
“We don’t want people just randomly deciding they want to cut the whole thing out of police or the whole thing out of fire, without knowing what the impact is,” FitzGerald-Kemmett said.
By presenting a budget and moving it the exact same way that you did [at the May 6 Town Meeting] – the exact same budget, with not even a period changed and is resubmitted to the schools – it reaffirms what you did and that budget schools.
“But the option has to be given to the voters to make a different decision,” she said.
Rein confirmed that “staying the course means the 5-percent increase, and that’s it.”
“In order to revisit the budget, you have to say this language that’s in Article 1,” FitzGerald-Kemmett said. “It allows the conversation about any potential change to the budget.”
Weeks summed up that the average voter is going to want to know, if they’re voting “no” on this, they’ll want to know what kicks it back to the School Committee for the potential of a lower assessment.
“People that want to keep the assessment, know they are going to vote ‘yes,’ is what I’m guessing,” he said. “The people who vote “no” will want to kick it back to the School Committee for the potential for a lower assessment. … I’m just hearing a lot of people saying they want to kick it back.”
FitzGerald-Kemmett said the only way the issue avoids going to a super town meeting is if it’s voted to appropriate more money for the school district budget.
Hats off to the future
They’ve experienced a lot in the last four years – a lot of it pandemic-related – lost dances, remote classes, ever-changing masking policies and a feeling of isolation, but the Class of 2024 emerged from the other side stronger, more resilient and more committed to community and connected to classmates, some of whom they didn’t even know four years ago.
They’ve grown up and are ready to face an uncertain future in a changing world, finding inspiration from the poetry, music and dramas of their youths.
In her welcoming address, Class President Emily Diehl of Whitman compared it to the experience of meeting a new friend from Hanson on the first day of their freshman year, neither one sure they were headed to the correct classroom, but they bonded in that moment and became best friends.
“The story of Makenna [Marshall] and me is the story of every graduating Senior who has since become friends with others from the opposite town,” Diehl said. “Together we have not only shared a physical building but have also shared an incredible journey, filled with many amazing activities and memories.”
She credited the very nature of W-H being a regional high school with having that effect, as wonder about the others from the town next door led to real connections, underscoring the thought with mention of the poem, “The Cookie Thief,” about a woman in an airport who thought she was sharing her bag of cookies with a stranger, and upset when he took the last one – only to later discover he had shared his cookies with her.
“With an eye towards future endeavors ahead, it is crucial to recognize the importance of sharing,” she said. “Whether it’s an idea, a helping hand, a smile or even a cookie, we are truly fulfilled when we share, selflessly, with others.”
For Valedictorian Ainsleigh Cobis, the 12 years the Class of 2024 has spent in school has been but a few moments in the morning of the rest of their lives, and recalled a line from her mom’s favorite movie, “Hope Floats:” : “Begingings are usually scary and endings are usually sad, but it is what is in the middle that counts”.
She related how her decision to try to become valedictorian at age 15 was an uncertain step for her, not knowing how she might feel when, and if she reached that goal, and found that going on the journey may have been the most satisfying part of it all, even as she starts another journey in the fall at Harvard College.
“Class of 2024, this is your beginning. Reach for goals that appear to have an enticing journey, not just a rewarding end, because “it’s what’s in the middle that counts,’” she said, noting that selecting an AP psychology course was another journey – into the unexpected – which led her to her passion and discovery that being a psychologist was her career goal.
“Pick goals that seem appealing, but consider how you’re going to feel, who you are going to meet, and your opportunity for growth in the middle, because that’s what counts.” she said. “So the clock reads 5:30 a.m. Class of 2024, this is your sunrise. What are you going to do with your day?”
Salutatorian Nicole Donato, also found inspiration in the arts, leaning on the lyrics from songs by Fall Out Boy, which pointed her in a direction of self-acceptance and independence. When they sang “You are what you love, not who loves you.”
“Choosing to lead yourself outside the crowd will leave you free to be yourself, and free to make your own decisions,” she said. “In the end, it doesn’t matter what anybody thinks of you, because the only person everyone is thinking of is themselves. Trust me, nobody cares what you do or what you think, and that is a good thing. Be yourself, even if nobody else agrees.
“I hope you all choose to become your own leader.
“Lead yourselves into your careers, your higher education, or any other crazy dream you have. Don’t succumb to the pressures put on you by anybody, just be you. Just do it. We spent years being self-conscious teenagers, and now it’s time to be confident and strong adults.”
Student speaker Grace Cosgrave, who won the annual speech competition to address her classmates, looked to a favorite TV show for her message, describing the uncertainty fans of “Impractical Jokers” felt when two favorite cast members departed. But noted that learning to expect the unexpected has its rewards.
“As we embark on our individual journeys, and high school becomes just a distant memory, let us carry the spirit of friendship that has defined our time here,” she said. “May we continue to celebrate each other’s successes, lift each other up in times of need, and always cherish the bond that unites us as close as the ‘Impractical Jokers’ are.”
Wrapping up the speakers’ program, School Committee Chair Beth Stafford, Principal Dr. Christopher Jones and Superintendent of Schools Jeff Szymaniak offered the advice of their experience, before the highest awards and diplomas were bestowed on the class.
“I think a word that describes this class is ‘Caring,” Stafford said. “So many of you are involved with helping each other and yourselves. You took a tragedy and started a chapter of Active Minds. … You belong to other groups, Best Buddies, Unified Sports, LGBTQ and many other inclusive groups. You look out for each other.”
She said it is a trait not always learned through education and since it has worked its way into their lives, she challenged them to keep it going.
“Relationships shape us into the people we are,” Szymaniak said, describing the Class of 2024 as inclusive, gracious, accomplished and kind. “Relationships you have developed and are committed to will last long after … all the pomp and circumstance of tonight … I hope you become the best human being you can be.”
Jones offered some non-academic pointers he referred to as “other things” the class would need to know: forces beyond your control may take away all you own except your freedom to decide how you respond; and don’t aim at success. It should be an unintended consequence of dedication to what one cares most about.
“Success in life is mostly about control, who has it and what they do with it,” he said. “The rest is about the consistent small steps that keep you moving forward, regardless of any failures along the way. .. Be who you want to be, not what other define for you,”
SST updates Whitman on building plan
WHITMAN – South Shore Tech Superintendent-Director Dr. Thomas J. Hickey briefed the Select Board on Tuesday, June 5, 2024 on the status of the new building plan and proposed amendment to the vocational school district’s regional agreement.
“It’s been a few months since December, when we had a public forum in this same room,” Hickey said, noting he would also discuss admissions. “Enrollment does support a lot of the conversation about … debt share, when it comes to a school building project, and also make mention that we are continuing to work on a regional agreement amendment that will also have a connection to the building project.”
The full presentation can be seen on the Whitman-Hanson Community Access TV YouTube channel, and on rebroadcast of the Select Board meeting on their cable channel.
Right now, the district is talking with the Dept. of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) – Chris Lynch and Michelle Griffin – working on language that would adjust the part of the regional agreement dealing with debt apportionment. It is now a fixed share based on whenever a debt is authorized.
“We’re looking to move it to a four-year rolling average, which would allow changes in debt share based in changes in enrollment, with not a lot of volatility,” Hickey said.
Select Board member Shawn Kain asked if Hickey was confident that would be the case.
“I’m confident that DESE would be onboard with it,” Hickey replied, saying he has heard “virtually nothing” in terms of obstacles to it.
“Whitman is in a very vulnerable situation,” said Kain who indicated he was glad to hear about the amendment. “That would be not a deal-breaker for me, but I would have a hard time supporting the project if the regional agreement wasn’t amended.”
“With Marshfield’s inaugural class of 29 students, that’s about 4 percent, so I’m going to project to you that even if this [number of students] were to remain fixed, which I don’t think it will, every community’s share will adjust down,” Hickey said. “If we factor in a declining enrollment on top of bringing on a ninth community, we should see some relief for communities that feel like they’re at a high water mark for enrollment.”
Whitman’s position
He said there are 43 Whitman students graduating in the Class of 2024, with 31 in the incoming freshman class out of 70 applicants from the town. Whitman’s initial allotment if 20 new applicants and 11 from the school’s waiting list, Hickey explained, with a projection that the high demand will remain even as the town’s lower enrollment share continues over the next three years due to new seats provided to other towns such as Marshfield, which is in the process of joining the SST district and the size of the current school building.
“We have very strong demand from the community,” he said of the 70 applications this year. “Whitman is apportioned a number of seats based on the size of their eighth-grade population – and they fill those in a nanosecond – and then there are other seats from communities that don’t use all their seats.”
Historically, the waiting list consists of Whitman, Rockland and Abington students. Debt-share is tied to enrollment. So, without a revision of the regional agreement, Whitman would stay at about 25 percent, and would be responsible for that share of debt, but that debt level would decrease with a rolling admission, Whitman’s share could drop to, perhaps, 12 percent, decreasing the town’s debt.
“I would be saying the same thing if I were speaking to folks in Rockland, or in Abington, or Hanson, as well,” he said of the other large sending communities.
“Oct. 1 reports, as you well know are the official reports,” Hickey said. “Things can change, but I think we’re in the infield of the ballpark in terms of making a projection.”
He said the fiscal 2026 budget, in regard to just the operating assessment, the general track record for the district has been that, absent a large capital budget, a decrease in enrollment generally means a decrease in the operating assessment.
“I support the project,” Kain said. “I think this is badly needed, I think you do a very good job, I love the numbers. I do have a concern about the regional agreement, but it seems its being taken care of – but this is a big nut to take one.”
MSBA project
The preferred new construction option carries an estimated total cost of $283 million with the current estimated MSBA reimbursement at $107 million with the member towns dividing the remaining $176 million apportioned by enrollment. If that is rejected the estimated total cost for renovation, including major code upgrades is at $110 million with no funding from MSBA.
“I’m very careful to point out that [in the renovation option] this is not something that’s going to happen immediately,” Hickey said, noting that officials have heard the code upgrade warnings before in other school projects. “We’re still talking millions, we’re still talking who can fit these costs under the levy limit.”
He is expecting firmer numbers by August.
“The school roof is not going to fall in if this project fails,” he said. “I’m not going to advertise doom and gloom fait acompli, it’s going to be changed. But I do want to map out a five-to-seven-year sequence where, if either path were to happen, where would we be in 2030?”
The district is now in the middle of the schematic design phase, looking at a deadline of mid-August for the project team to finalize it for submission to the Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) by the end of that month. The district envisions being before the MSBA board for their approval on Oct. 30.
“That will be the first day that we can say, without qualification or an asterisk, that, ‘This is the project budget. This is how much the grant is,’” he said. But, by August they should able to closely estimate the project cost. Over the summer, any written updates Hickey said he could provide would involve adjustments to the schematic design.
After the MSBA, the district will be preparing for a Jan. 25, 2025 district-wide ballot question, in which two-thirds of the member towns – six of the nine – would have to vote to support the project for it to move ahead.
“A separate matter that each community will have to take up would be how the project gets funded, if it is approved,” Hickey said. For most communities that would involve a debt exclusion.
Deeper design work would then be done.
Kain asked about any push-back on the ballot question, to which Hickey said he has heard no negative feedback.
“Everybody’s enrollment changes at some point, and with an adjustment in enrollment, it affects operating assessments,” he said, adding that the age of the building, constructed in 1960, the language of the regional agreement was drafted just to build the school in the first place. It had already been amended twice in the last seven years alone.
Hickey said he was not aiming for a school building that makes the cover of Architectural Digest.
“We don’t want people paying a lot of money for a cardboard box, we want something efficient,” he said. “If we’re going to put money into this, it’s got to be into the specialized educational spaces. It’s a very simple design, easy for supervision.”
Town Administrator Mary Beth Carter pointed to Gov. Maura Healey’s Empowerment Act, which could extend borrowing on such projects out to 40 years.
“I don’t really like the thought of going out 40 years, but on these huge projects it would make a big difference,” she said.
“If that weren’t on the books at the time that we’re making this move, I would hope that we could advocate for it – that the legislation would reflect our ability to readjust for it,” Hickey said. “It’s definitely on my radar.”
Last call for households hazardous waste recycling this spring
Scituate and Cohasset will host the last South Shore Recycling Cooperative (SSRC) household hazardous waste collection this spring It will take place from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m., on June 15. Fall events will start in October. Registration is required, to reduce wait times. The address and other important event details are revealed on the registration form at bit.ly/Spring24hhw.
All will take place as follows:
- Do not bring LATEX/ACRYLIC PAINT. These paints “clean up with soap and water.” They are not hazardous, just messy. It may be dried and disposed of with regular trash. For more information, review the registration form at bit.ly/ssrchhw or call 781-329-8318.
Hanson board to meet again on TM
HANSON – The warrant article for the June 17 special Town Meeting was reviewed by Select Board on Tuesday, May 28, but no vote has been taken as of yet due to questions over the clarity of syntax and the need for Finance Committee’s recommendation.
Finance Committee was also meeting on May 28 and Chair Laura FitzGerald-Kemmett said by next meeting the Select Board will have that committee’s well-thought-out cuts.
The Select Board plans to meet again at 7 p.m., Friday, May 30 once the articles are revised and clarified, with a tentative fallback time set for 5:30 p.m. Friday, May 31, if needed. The Town Meeting Article must be posted by June 1.
“Basically, what we are doing is we are having a special Town Meeting to vote the budget with the school assessment minus an override question,” Town Administrator Lisa Green said. “The budget that’s going to be presented will show approximately $372,141 in budget cuts, with the numbers they will be getting. The Finance Committee is meeting this evening to discuss those.”
The initial language of Article 1, as drafted by Town Counsel Kate Feodoroff asks the town to vote in Town Meeting whether it should “rescind its approval of the town budget under Article 5 of the May 6, 2024 annual Town Meeting and to determine what sums of money town will raise and appropriate by taxation, transfer from free cash, transfer from town ambulance funds, Water Department revenue, water surplus, the Title V special revenue fund, MWAT loan repayment receipts reserved for appropriation, Conservation Notice of Intent fund, overlay surplus and unbalanced reserve for reduction of future excluded debt to defray charges and expenses of the town.”
Those expenses include payment of debt and interest while providing for a reserve fund for fiscal year 2025.
Feodoroff’s original text of the Article 1 explanation reads that on May 6, the town approved the “FY 2025 annual omnibus budget in Article 6, and disapproved the contingent appropriation for the W-H regional school district.
“The disapproval of Article 6 resulted in the rejection of the budget as assessed by the district,” Feodoroff wrote. “The original budget request was $14,974,735; but $14,602,595 was approved at Town Meeting and the contingent appropriation of $372,141 failed.”
The School Committee then met and revoted to resubmit the school assessment of $14,974,735 “for this town meeting’s consideration,” the explanation continued. “The purpose of this article is to present and deliberate upon the district’s reassessment and determine whether to approve:
- A reduced budget for the W-H regional school district as previously approved which would be sent to the School Committee, which would determine whether to accept the reduced amount or reject it, forcing a district-wide meeting;
- Approve the full school assessment with reduced services in the town’s budget; or
- Approve such other budget as may be deliberated upon by Town Meeting.
“I don’t want people to need a decoder ring to make it through this explanation, FitzGerald-Kemmett said, suggesting that it be edited by making bullet points of the options “so it reads, ‘here’s a choice, here’s a choice, here’s a choice.’”
She argued that would make things more apparent.
Board Clerk Ed Heal said the “decoder ring” issue for him was in the main text of the article where it said the original budget was approved, “but then, they came back with the same number,” he said.
“It’s not the same number,” Rein said.
“It’s not crystal clear, the way it’s written,” FitzGerald-Kemmett said. “Why are we using the words ‘omnibus budget?’ Does anybody even know what the hell that means? I’m not saying I don’t know what the word omnibus means, I’m saying it just adds extraneous words that don’t need to be there.”
After discussing the vocabulary used the Board composed a more direct way of explaining the article for submission to Town Counsel for approval.
“This is where I think it jumps the track,” FitzGerald-Kemmett said about the original legal syntax of the article. “Can we just say ‘did not approve the contingent appropriation?”
“It’s not wrong, it’s convoluted,” Vice Chair Ann Rein said. “It’s too wordy.”
“You’re all in the know, you pay more attention to this than the 300-plus people that are going to show up [for Town Meeting], said Board member Joe Weeks. “The more information and the more [direct] you could make the language, the more you’re going to have informed voters.”
Heal suggested that the language make clear the difference, making clear that the $372,141 is the difference between what was requested and what was voted upon.
FitzGerald-Kemmett said the board has consistently outlined the difference between what was described and what was requested and what we appropriated.
FitzGerald-Kemmett wanted to try a different approach providing more clarification of the articles.
“We need it to be clear,” she said.
The final language the board worked out for town counsel approval reads: that “on May 6, the town approved the annual budget and did not appropriate the contingent appropriation for the W-H Regional School District. The disapproval of Article 6 resulted in the rejection of the budget as assessed by the district. … The original budget request was $14,974,735; but $14,602,595 was approved at Town Meeting and the contingent appropriation of $372,141 failed. (The contingent appropriation ‘the delta’) between the School District and municipal budgets.”
The Town Meeting options here are: - A reduced budget for the W-H Regional School District as previously approved;
- To present and deliberate on the district’s reassessment and to determine whether to approve it;
Appropriate a full schools assessment amount with reduced services in the town budget; or
Approve such other business could be deliberated on Town Meeting floor.
FitzGerald-Kemmett said even that language seems to be contradicting ourselves, because we say that we approved the [municipal] budget in Article 6 and disapproved a contingent appropriation, but in the next sentence talks about, the disapproval of Article 6.
“It’s like, pick a lane,” she said. The two lanes should be Article 1, tied to an explanation in Article 2 is no change, the budget is the one passed May 6.
Heal and Weeks suggested the contingent appropriation was Article 7 of the May Town Meeting.
In the June 17 warrant.
“I really want to go into this meeting without using ‘lawyer speak’ to pull something over on people,” Weeks said, noting the three possible outcomes if the budget passes. “Which of the possible outcomes are we going to get? Heal asked if each of the options would be voted on.
“We are absolutely trying to avoid making cuts from the floor,” FitzGerald-Kemmett said. “We want to be thoughtful about what the cuts are. We don’t want to be flying by the seat of our pants and cut the Veterans Agent or some other crazy thing that we haven’t all thought about and [asked ourselves] what are the ramifications?”
The Finance Committee’s meeting that night was for just that thought as they advise the Select Board on cuts and the Town Accountant is also going through that process with the aim of those recommendations reviewed by the Select Board Thursday or Friday, May 30 or 31.
“Ideally, we’ll align, but we may not,” she said, adding the Town Meeting will have two choices in the end:
A budget with no cuts – in essence, another “no” back to the school district; or
Not saying no, but saying yes to the budget by making cuts in services and other budget line items.
“Those will be presented side-by-side, just like we presented the line budget at Town Meeting, we’ll have a line budget for this, which will show where we’re cutting,” she said.
A third option is because someone could stand up at Town Meeting and cut things the board had not anticipated or planned to cut.
“If we vote yes on Article one, what happens,” Weeks asked. “The explanation is supposed to tell me what happens, but it’s not. It’s giving me every single option under the sun, which is obvious… If I was the casual or semi-casual [resident] coming to Town Meeting, knowing this is something I’m passionate about and wanting to know exactly what I’m voting for … Even me reading this right now I don’t know what I’m going to explain to people.”
In unison, Heal and Weeks suggested that, instead of a list of options for cuts, it be presented as “a yes vote means this and a no vote means this.”
FitzGerald-Kemmett instead suggested that it be presented as two articles, with Article 1 carrying the explanation “we’re not going to rescind anything” but rather the choice should be to approve the school assessment with reduced services in the town budget.
Article one is the explanation, and if Article 2 is rejected, it would lead to article 3 to the information of where the cuts will be made, Weeks suggested.
“… You have to arm people, in a very specific way,” he said.
SST plan moves ahead
HANOVER – South Shore Tech School Committee, meeting with the Building Committee has hired a construction management firm, Suffolk Construction of Boston, and met some of the firm’s principals at its Wednesday, May 22 meeting.
Kevin Sullivan also joined the project management team from LeftField while Jen Carlson is out on maternity leave. Sullivan updated the two committees – which overlap in membership – on CMS work, the availability of feasibility funds and plan updates.
Suffolk Construction was selected from five firms interviewing on May 9 for the contract, which was recommended by the Building Subcommittee, May 10. based on scoring made based on the five firms’ proposals, the interview and price proposals: Consigli Construction, Gilbane, Turner and Lee Kennedy construction firms were also interviewed.
“There were some very talented firms showing interest in our school project and it was a very deliberate process,” said Superintendent-Director Dr. Thomas J. Hickey who served on the subcommittee panel conducting the interviews as well as members Robert Mallo and Robert Mahoney, along with representatives from leftfield and architectural firm DRA. “I’m happy right at this point to move this process forward.”
The Building Committee voted in favor of the construction management contract award to Suffolk Construction on Wednesday, May 22, making it official with an 11-0 vote. The contract carries $50,000 for schematic design from feasibility study funds and $268,826 for pre-construction costs from general conditions fees.
Hickey said contract negotiations may include minor changes the committee will plan in deference to any changes deemed necessary the school district’s legal counsel to review the state’s contract template.
The School Committee later voted to finalize the Jan. 26 election date in member towns on the MSBA school project, before shifting back into the Building Committee session.
Sullivan then reviewed the funds paid out on the project so far and updated the committee on the budget as members approved of $67,540 for a contract amendment within the budget regarding work being done in the schematic design phase of the feasibility study, including a traffic analysis and geotechnical services regarding soil samples where the new school would go. He noted that 79 percent of the feasibility studies budget has been committed and 52 percent of those funds expended so far, expecting to stay within the feasibility budget and have $210,228 left over when the work in this phase is complete.
“We’re confident that we’ve stayed within budget and will continue to do so,” he said.
The MSBA schedule will require the schematic design report to be submitted there by Aug. 29 and a budget turned in by mid-August. MSBA will review the information at its October board meeting.
“This project will be complying with the new, very strict energy code, sort of going above and beyond, too,” Sullivan said of plans surrounding the mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems. “Not only will it produce an energy-efficient building with low operating costs going forward for the district, which is great, but also initially it will allow the district to receive 4 percent more in reimbursement from MSBA.”
To provide an illustration of how important that is, Sullivan used the example of a $20 million project, which would increase the MSBA reimbursement by $8 million. The project would also be in line for receiving significant utility company rebates as part of state and federal incentive programs.
“That’s not factored into the equation yet,” he said, noting that they are communicating with the state program and National Grid to ensure that the company will comply.
The all-electric powered building will mean it would produce little fossil fuel impact to the environment while being more efficient. Solar panels on the roof could be a part of that.
“We’re certainly making the entire building solar-ready,” he said.
Shop design will include lockers for all students, a work area where instructors can effectively supervise students while having space to do their work and – in high-ceiling shop bays, a mezzanine with dedicated HVAC equipment for ventilation. Vestibules between shop work areas and the hallways will help control noise.
Leaving the district administration offices in the renovated former house next door, where they have been working for about a year, will allow a smaller school building and using space more efficiently in the school will make it 2-percent smaller, which will also help with the budget bottom line, as well as re-use of recently purchased equipment, Sullivan said. The site plan is also being developed, but he said there have not been any significant changes there as yet.
Suffolk will set up on site in June 2026 in an area at the back of the property to keep impact on neighbors to a minimum as well as being adjacent to where the new building is actually constructed. They foresee being able to raze the current school building by May 2028. Athletic fields, to be situated where the school now stands will be ready by 2029.
In other business before the School Committee, members held the annual public hearing for participation in school choice. As has been traditional for SST, the committee unanimously voted not to participate in school choice for the 2024-25 school year because the district has an established process for admitting students from outside the school district.
Principal Sandra Baldner reported that, while the official report has not yet been released, the school has received a generally positive preliminary report following a recent two-day NEASC reaccreditation site visit, which had only a couple suggestions for improvement.
She also reviewed the goals of the 2024-25 school improvement plan. Those goals include: extension education; professional development; making sure short-term and long-term budget funding supports the population on campus, starting next year; as well as teaching learning and foundational element of professional practice as the School Council wants the school to focus on artificial intelligence – or AI.
“What does that mean for teachers and students – the good, the bad and the indifferent and how do we manage that and move forward as educators and learners,” Baldner said.
Cultural proficiency is another area on which the school will continue to focus, as the school has done for the past two years, but it will be more site-based than bringing in outside experts. Student mental health and the educational resources around mental health will also continue to be stressed as well as the mental health of educators.
The final details will be presented to the School Committee and posted on the school website this summer.
“We have a small School Council, but our stakeholders that we engaged in the process of identifying our needs was vast, through surveys and virtual opportunities to connect with us,” she said, thanking the council and stakeholders for their work.
Parent group boosts SST students, programs
HANOVER – South Shore Tech School Committee honored its Parents Association during the Wednesday, May 22 School Committee meeting, for their “exceptional commitment to SST programs every school year.”
“It is with great pleasure that we recognize their outstanding contributions and to express our gratitude for their unwavering support for all things South Shore Tech,” said Principal Sandra Baldner. “Their tireless efforts and dedication have made significant impacts the success of our students and their well-being.”
She was joined by Erin Venuti, who spoke for the group and Cynthia Ortiz, Karen Burgio and Jessica Franceschini, both of Hanson and Leigh Gilcoine joined her at the meeting. The Parents’ Association works to make the school a positive and inclusive environment for both students and parents.
Venuti’s daughter is graduating this year, so she is stepping down from the Parents’ Association, but has been asked to serve as parent liaison with the School Building Committee.
Throughout the school year, the association puts in “endless hours of volunteer work,” advocacy of positive communication throughout SST, resourcefulness and collaborations with all members of the school community, according to Baldner.
“Their ability to bring people together and work toward common goals has been invaluable,” she said. “Their unwavering support and commitment have made a significant difference in the lives of our students and in the overall success of our school.”
Baldner said they could often be seen “lugging SST gear” from car to car and event to event, rain or shine, year after year. She also said she values the association as a working mom because he work at SST does not give her the time to volunteer with her children’s vocational school program.
Acting Parents’ Association President Erin Venuti offered some highlights of the current members time volunteering for SST students and programs.
Venuti said she joined when she heard Hickey speak of no fees for sports or athletics and giving every student a chance to participate.
“I don’t know if he realizes the impact that those particular things, and funding those opportunities really do have on our student body,” she said. “Through the course of that, I ended up here.”
Venuti said her running joke is that it’s like [The Eagle’s hit] ‘Hotel California’ – you can check in, but you can never leave.” To demonstrate how that is true for her, she said she is transitioning to her new department, to work with Hickey as a parent liaison on the new School Building Committee.
“This has been one of our most successful years,” she said, underscoring Baldner’s comments. “One of the most important things we looked at was bringing back an in-person community event.”
That led to member Cynthia Ortiz suggesting and given free rein on what became one of the most successful fundraisers ever – a singo event at Players Restaurant in Auburn. This year, there were a couple more – signature T-shirts for sale to support mental health awareness and suicide prevention at the annual car show. This year’s first-edition T-shirt sales brought in more than $4,000 from the sale for mental health and suicide prevention programs.
Students in the Graphic arts shop design them and teachers vote on which one to produce each year.
“That was one of my main aims to leave the school with, because it was very important and a very passionate project of mine,” she said.
Among the uses funds raised by the association are a monthly teacher appreciation coffee and pastry event and new sideline chairs provided for the gym for the use of volleyball and basketball games. They also purchased a new camera for the Graphics Department to use for producing the yearbook. They also continue the annual awards program to help support any student going on to higher education, or for specialized tools needed for their trades.
“But we wanted things that could transition into a new building,” Venuti said. “We don’t want to spend money on something that’s not going to stay. The sideline chairs can transition to the gym and really did make the kids feel special and people know, when they come to the gym, they are at South Shore Tech. They know our colors. They know our logo.”
The association is also bringing back the Class events, starting with the Class of 2024 – sponsoring the lawn signs given free of charge to the families of each graduating senior, bottled water for graduations in hot weather, shop cords for cap and gown ensembles, senior breakfast and senior lunch, the annual students’ civics project and leaving each sports team with a kick-start to help them fund raise. Smaller requests often come in from school administration for which the association tries to help as well as a $500 donation to SkillsUSA.
“The outgoing graduates lost a lot to COVID,” she said. “These were things we all agreed we need to bring back to make sure they feel they are leaving school on a positive note and not just leaving.”
She concluded by reminding the meeting that the Parents’ Association is “not a one-man-band.”
“It is all of us, together,” she said. “There are no titles. We’re all equal – we all talk the same, we all express the same. … We are all involved in the community, we are all selling the same story, the positive community atmosphere.”
Spring’s last chance to recycle hazardous stuff around the house
Register now for the last two spring Household Hazardous Waste collection days.
Five South Shore Recycling Cooperative (SSRC) towns will host the last two household hazardous waste collections this spring.
Registration is required, to reduce wait times.
The addresses and other important event details are revealed on the registration form at bit.ly/Spring24hhw.
All will take place from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. as follows:
Saturday, June 8 — Duxbury, Kingston & Pembroke NO LATEX/ACRYLIC PAINT
Saturday, June 15 — Scituate & Cohasset NO LATEX/ACRYLIC PAINT
Latex and acrylic paint “cleans up with soap and water.” It is not hazardous, just messy. It may be dried and disposed of with regular trash.
If you have questions after reviewing the registration form, visit bit.ly/ssrchhw or call 781-329-8318.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- …
- 192
- Next Page »