HANSON – The Select Board on Tuesday, May 13 voted to take a two-pronged approach to enforcing the town’s “nip” alcohol bottle ban, on the books – but ignored by at least some alcoholic beverage retailers – since Jan. 1.
“The cleanest, best way to proceed would be to move down two tracks,” Town Counsel Matt Provencher told the Select Board. “When you issue a liquor license under Chapter 138, whether it’s a restaurant license or a retail [alcohol] license, you’re acting under power that the state legislature gave to the Select Board … as the licensing authority.”
Select Board Chair Laura FitzGerald-Kemmett said she would have Town Administrator Lisa Green work on a letter of non-compliance with a timeline of 30 days, after which the board approved the motion.
Those two tracks involve the placement of “reasonable conditions” on the issuance of a license, and the board can issue regulations that apply to licenses issued in the town.
“The first thing you can do is send these folks a notice that, based on their failure to voluntarily comply [with town regulations] … that you’re going to contemplate bringing them in for a hearing to determine whether their licenses need to be modified to include an expressed condition that they’re not allowed to sell nips,” Provencher said.
Licenses already awarded and not due to go into effect because the contracts didn’t have that because the law didn’t go into effect until Jan, 1, 2025.
The board can also issue a notice to hold a public hearing on some regulations that you’re going to adopt,” Provencher said.
“I’d like to do both,” said FitzGerald-Kemmett.
“I think we should do both,” said Committee member Joe Weeks. Member Ed Heal also agreed to that approach.
One of the retailers, Irwin Patel, apparently admitted to selling nips in violation of the ban during discussion of an annual attempt by various residents by citizen’s petition at Town Meeting. A 2024 Town Meeting vote had placed the ban on the books. [See related story]
I don’t care whether we ban nips or not,” said Town Moderator Sean Kealy, who had purchased a nip bottle at Hanson’s Village Mini-mart in April to use as a prop proving at the May 5 Town Meeting that the ban was being ignored. “What bothers me, what really disgusts me, is when people don’t follow the law that this Town Meeting passed.”
Kealy said he would be seeking a conversation with the Select Board about methods of enforcing the ban and for other issues on which Town Meeting took votes.
Town Administrator Lisa Green said she would work with town counsel and we’ll get the regulations together and, if a hearing is held she said she would comply with all of the regulations as far as hearings.”
Provencher said setting up a hearing would involve being authorized to send a letter to retailers noting she is aware that they haven’t been in complete compliance. If they were going to issue a notice of non-compliance hearing to determine whether their license should be modified, suspended or revoked.
Providing the retailers notice of public hearings while the town prepares the Municipal regulations, will include a copy of the proposed regulations, and everyone will have the opportunity to be heard, Provencher said.
“Since we do have this being somewhat of a groundhog day, with the [attempts at repeal] continuing, and there is a potential that somebody Could submit a citizens petition to, yet again, repeal the nip ban,” she basically asked if they believed there was a bylaw.

With all the debate swirling around the Proposition 2.5 override question on Town Election ballots in both Whitman and Hanson, it’s been a comparatively quiet news cycle surrounding the rest of the ballot as residents head to the polls on Saturday, May 17.
There is only one contested seat in either town, and that is between incumbent School Committee members Glen DiGravio and Steven Cloutman vs newcomer Thomas Raffey Jr., in Hanson. DiGravio and Cloutman are both incumbents and Raffey is a newcomer who moved to Hanson in 2020, but who’s wife, Alexandra, a nurse who provides in-home care to disabled veterans, is a 2007 graduate of Whitman-Hanson Regional High School. Raffey, an electrician is a member of the IBEW 103, who has also worked for a year as a teacher at Central Catholic High School in Lawrence.
Raffey stated in his candidate announcement to the Express [see page 10] that both he and his wife are committed to giving back to the community.
“My civic involvement—serving on the Hanson Master Plan Subcommittee and currently as Chair of the Hanson Conservation Commission—has provided me with valuable experience in working collaboratively to address the needs of our community,” Raffey stated.
DiGravio and Cloutman, serving his first term on the committee have provided dependable representation to Hanson’s conservative residents on the committee.
While there is only one candidate for Town Clerk, it is worth noting that it’s a race that represents another kind of change, as incumbent Elizabeth Sloan is retiring from the post she has served in for 15 years. Newcomer Jessica Franceschini is on the ballot to succeed Sloan.
Other candidates on the Hanson ballot are: Edwin Heal, running unopposed for Select Board; Anne Merlin for assessor; incumbent Peter Butler for Board of Heath; Justin M. Robertson for Planning Board; incumbent Dianna McDevitt and Pamela French running for Hanson Library Trustee (vote for two); Michael A. Hunter for Hanson Housing Authority; and Gilbert Amado, Don Howard and Kevin R. Perkins are on the ballot for the three available seats on the Water Commissioners.
In Whitman, incumbent Stephanie Blackman, elected last year to fill a vacancy on the School Committee when Fred Small passed away is seeking re-election, as is incumbent Christopher Marks, elected last year to fill the vacated seat of David Forth. Other unopposed School Committee candidates are incumbent Chair Beth Stafford and newcomer Ryan J. Tressel, who said in an announcement to the Express last week that as the parent of an autistic child, Tressel is running, “so that every student, not every family, has had as positive an experience with school as we have.”
Other uncontested races on the Whitman Town Election ballot are: Emily T. Millet, running to fill a vacancy in the office of the Treasuer-Collectors Office.
Incumbent Select Board members Justin Evans and Shawn Kain are running unopposed for re-election; as are Christine McPherson running unopposed for assessor; Lauren A. Kelley and Margaret P. McEwan running for two seats the Library Trustees. Anne M. Holbrook is running for Housing Authority and Adam J. Somerville is seeking a seat on the Planning Board. Jamie L. Rhynd is running for unopposed for the Board of Health.
There is a contested race for a seat on the DPW Commissioner between incumbent Kevin Cleary and Mark A. Poirier and Thomas A. Pistorino.
And, of course, both towns will be voting on a ballot question about overriding the Proposition 2.5 cap on the tax levy to fund town business as well as the W-H Regional School Distrit.
A second ballot question in Whitman again asks residents about changing the Treasurer-Collector position from an elected to an appointed one.

The W-H Regional Agreement Committee on Wednesday, April 16, held further discussions about non-mandated busing, but ended up voting to leave the transportation section as-is for now.
During the session Chair Hillary Kniffen, she asked for feedback on the discussions at its last meeting. In February, she had asked members to present their ideas or opinions about revising that portion of the Regional Agreement.
“I think I know, based on what I’ve watched and seen, but for the record for people who are going to watch this meeting,” she said she’d like to hear them.
Hanson Select Board Chair Laura FitzGerald-Kemmett said her board has talked about it multiple times.
“The board’s view is that they do not want to present any Regional Agreement that includes this,” she said. “It doesn’t mean we wouldn’t talk about it at some other point, but now is not the point and now is not the time.”
FitzGerald-Kemmett said she felt the committee has made a lot of progress on a number of points (and) some members of her board feel particularly passionate about non-mandated busing, in particular.
“To the point where – we didn’t take an official vote on this, but we did discuss it,” she said. “And I’ve had feedback from people that they wouldn’t even be willing to present any agreement that would include this.”
Kniffen agreed.
“We’ve made a lot of progress with knocking things off and I don’t think that all that work should be in vain,” she said of any effort to revise non-mandated busing regulations now.
Whitman Select Board Justin Evans said he brought it before that board before the last Regional Agreement session.
“They were, as you could imagine, in favor of making the switch and simplifying the transportation assessment process … even if we remove the change in how we assess now, there could still be a benefit to changing the way we send the assessments to the towns,” he said. “Even if the same calculation is performed, including that in the one assessment that gets sent to the towns.”
In that case, even if the amount in dollars were to go up the first year, there wouldn’t be the threat of voting it down.
“I’m focused more on the financial savings,” he said.
Hanson Finance Committee member Steve Amico said his committee has also discussed the issue and “are kind of in concert with the Select Board.”
“It was a discussion, but it wasn’t anything that was in-depth,” he said.
Whitman Finance Chair Kathleen Ottina said that, with a 50-percent rookie committee, so she said she simply informed them that there is a learing curve to understanding transportation costs.
Her committee has also not taken a vote.
Kniffen, who said she attended the last School Committee virtually, said her understanding was that the towns were split.
“I don’t want to make a Regional Agreement where one town feels strongly against something, [and] the other town feels strongly for something, because then it’s not going to go anywhere,” Kniffen said. “I don’t think that’s wise at this point.”
They had already added a provision into the Regional Agreement to look at it every three to five years, and determine of further revisions are neeeded.
“Right now is not the time to say, ‘Oh, and we’re going to add more costs. “That’s not the way to go to get anything sold,” she said. “I’m not comfortable saying, “Oh, we’re going ahead and changing things.”
“No matter how you clean up that language, the end result is convoluted,” Ottina said. “You’ve got one way of assessing mandated costs, and you’ve got a different way of assessing non-mandated costs.”
School Committee member Rosemary Connolly, however, said the message was clear that the message that came back from the School Committee meeting Kniffen referred to was that “they didn’t understand the breakout and the financial impact to the towns,” which is what the School Committee needs to be voting on the breakout and the total financial impact for them to revisit.
She maintained she would not be “budged for a second for political gains.”
Kniffen said the spilt between the towns on the issue was the reason she was not asking for a vote and did not think the RA committee should move forward with it.
“I think to keep insinuating that ‘people from the other town don’t understand,’ is incredibly insulting,” FitzGerald-Kemmett said. “Just because we don’t agree with a proposal doesn’t mean that we don’t understand it.”
FitzGerald-Kemmett maintained that she hasn’t said the issue is “forever off the table,” but there needs to be some recognition – if the towns are supposed to be partners – that Hanson has had “ a very tough pill to swallow” with the change to the statutory assessment formula.
“We can get into whether it should have been done earlier and all that,” she said. “[It] doesn’t really matter because that’s where we’re at now, and I can tell you it will detonate the relationship.”
She said she hears what Connolly is saying and appreciates her passion, but added, “My modus operando is, ‘do you want to be right or do you want to get what you want?’ If you want to be right, beat your breast and go on soapboxes and all that other stuff. If you ultimately want to continue with a partnership … then there does have to be some recognition that you can represent your consitituents, but do it in a way that does no harm.”
She said the $50,000 difference at stake is not a question of bankrupting one town for another.
Ottina said the Regional Agreement Committee has accomplished a lot so far.
“As much as I would like to propose language change for Section 5—Transportation, it’s not going to go anywhere. I’m pragmatic, but down the road we have to be careful about leaving non-mandated busing as a target on the warrant.”
She said it either has to become part of the schools’ operatin budget or, in future years, it’s a sitting duck.

After meeting with Select Board and/or Finance Committee members from Whitman and Hanson during the previous week, district officials painted another gloomy picture of the school year to come without an operational override for both town and school budgets.
“No matter what, Whitman needs $2.4 million to balance for next year,” Superintendent of Schools Jeff Szymaniak reported to the School Committee at its Wednesday, March 26 meeting.
“Without that override in Whitman the number is very sobering to us,” Szymaniak said.
The overall WHRSD proposal, after all, is $66,306,206 at a 5.6 percent increase – the contingency budget, based on current figures without an override, would be $64,306,274 or a 2.19 percent – a $2 million reduction.
“Based on the budget we received from Whitman … in their contingency budget, if the override doesn’t pass, we are asking them in our 2026 proposed operating assessment, for $20,982,307 – a 9.65 percent assessment increase,” Szymaniak said. Whitman’s contingency number is $19,759,924 – a 3.26 percent assessment increase, or $1.22 million.
The contingency budget in Hanson, without an override the district would be asking for $16,452,000 – a 9.87 percent increase. Hanson’s contingency number is $15,674,746 – a 4.67 percent assessment increase.
“Overall it would be a $2 million cut, if the overrides do not pass,” Szymaniak said. Who said he has had “very good” conversations with finance and select boards. “Both towns are seeking an operational override for everyone.”
“What I got was, it’s an operational override to exist with level services for both communities,” Szymaniak said. “I’m not hearing, at least from the Whitman side, that there are add-ons – Hanson may, as far as fire and services. … But $2 million is breathtaking to start.”
Committee chair Beth Stafford echoed Szymaniak’s observations about the across-the-board cuts Whitman was expecting would be necessary if the override failed.
“It certainly was not any pitting one department against another,” she said. “It was overall, everybody across the board, this is what’s going to happen.”
While a three-year Whitman spending package would carry them through with a $4.25 flexible number with increments of: $2.4 million to fiscal ’26, another amount to FY ’27 and another amount to FY ’28, Szymaniak explained.
“That will carry us through, as well through FY ’28, to the numbers that [Business Manager Steven] Marshall has appropriated through the Whitman Finance Committee and the Select Board, as far as numbers that would sustain our budget – and potentially add to our budget moving forward, depending on how things shake out with the state,” he said.
No decision was made by the Whitman Select Board that night (March 25), but after the joint session with the Finance Committee, FinCom members unanimously voted to support a one-year override.
“But no matter what, Whitman needs $2.4 million to balance for next year,” Szymaniak said.
“The three-year would carry them through – and I think it’s 4.25 with a flexible number with an increment of 2.56 in February of 2026,” he said.

Now it’s time to show their work, School Committee members say, as they gear up for town meetings and their mission of gaining passage of the budget completed at town meetings – as well as the ballot box.
This time, the overrides are aimed at funding all departments in Whitman and Hanson – not just the schools.
Superintendent of Schools Jeff Szymaniak recommended that the committee affirm the assessment figures he provided in the February – a $66,306,276,19 level-service spending plan that is up $3,375,931.19 over the $ 62,530,345 budgeted in FY 25 – a total budget increase of 5.6 percent.
As of now, operational assessment totals are 61.12 percent or ($20.9 million, a 9.65 percent increase over last year – $1,846,621.19 by dollars) for Whitman, and 38.88 percent ($16.4 million, a 9.87 percent increase – $1,477387.35 in dollars) for Hanson.
The committee voted to certify the fiscal 2025 operating budget at $66,306,219.,9 by a vote of 9-1. Both assessment increases, non-mandated busing costs and each town’s debt assessment were also approved by 9-1 votes.
Steve Cloutman of Hanson voted no each time.
“I’m coming from a different perspective,” said School Committee member Rosemary Connolly, a former Whitman Finance Committee member. “The town is supposed to be working from a financial perspective. The town is supposed to be working with numbers and a plan that we gave, although when we made this plan, we didn’t have the risk of pullback of state and federal aid that we do now.”
The day after the Wednesday, March 19 meeting President Trump signed an executive order eliminating the federal Department of Education, a president has no legal authority to do that to a Congressionally established department.
That action should be factored in by the towns Connolly said.
“Jeff [Szymaniak] put forward what would have been, to me, a responsible, level-service plan with some risks, that we might not get the aid,” she said. “So, I’m with some [in thinking] that this isn’t enough, because there are risks. We are the only department that holds so much aid and grants – risky finances.”
For those reasons Connolly said, while she understands the district’s position, there’s a risk that the budget – and by extension, the assessments – are too low.
“We want every kid to be successful and we want to be those roots for their lives, and if we don’t have a budget, we don’t have good roots for those kids,” she said noting that all district children, including those who go to South Shore Tech start in W-H Schools.
Szymaniak spoke about a legislative breakfast he had attended the week before when budgets were the topic of conversation.
There are 45 towns across the state going for overrides this year as of last week, and 245 districts are in hold-harmless right now, Szymaniak said.
“Everybody’s concerned about that,” he said. “What we got from the legislators is they are working on a safety net in case that happens because we wouldn’t be the only town or district devastated.”
“The only thing that can be done this year is, if this does not pass is we’re cutting people,” Chair Beth Stafford. “There’s no fat.
The district doesn’t have the E&D to do it, she said, adding the district have done their cuts there already, leaving it bare minimum last year.
“That’s not happening this year,” she said.
The state is also looking at the Fair Share Act as a potential funding mechanism, as well, he said.
“That is a risk that is uncertain,” he said.
In rough numbers, federal grants account for important programs, with the “heavy” one being the 240 Grant’s $1.9 million, Szymaniak said. Title 1, after-school grants are included in that figure.
“I don’t know if I could fiscally put that on the town in case that doesn’t happen,” he said. “There’s money out there that could be wiped away with the loss of [the Department of Education] and some funding.”
“I think that’s a concern for everybody, no matter where they are,” Stafford said. “We need to really push for this budget. We need to be really careful, but we need everybody to be at the Town Meeting when this does go through.”
Noting that both towns would likely seek an override, Stafford told School Committee members that they must be supportive and attend town meetings.
“If we don’t, and that override does not happen, we could lose, probably, if we don’t get what we need to get,” she said. That means a minimum of 21 employees – 14, plus another seven whose salaries would be needed to fund unemployment costs – could be lost.
“I’m all for foreign languages,” she said. “I’m all for robotics, and hopefully, when we are putting forth, that the town has requested, what we want coming up, we can put those in the budget,” she said. “It’s not just what we want, it’s what we need. … We need to show up, and have our voices heard, that’s our job.”
Hanson Committee member Glenn DiGravio asked if the assessment numbers could be rejected.
“They can’t be rejected,” Szymaniak said. “We can always lower that number.”
But he said it could end up back at the School Committee it will have to take up the issue than.
“To me that’s a financial crisis,” DiGravio said. “That’s a lot of money. What we’re asking is for us not to be affected by that money – we’re going to push this to the town, and either the taxpayers are going to pick up the slack or the town’s going to cut jobs, but we’re asking not to cut anything, correct? We don’t want to cut anything, you guys [the towns] have to cut and you guys have to pay, but we’re not changing what we’re doing.”
“We’re not changing because they say they’re going for an override,” Stafford said.
DiGravio asked if the other departments are making cuts, and schools officials said they don’t believe so.
Szymaniak said that, from what he’d seen in published reports, Hanson is not planning cuts to other departments at this point and Whitman is not offering up an alternative budget reflecting any forecast cuts.
Whitman Select Board member Justin Evans said his board has been working through various budget scenarios, as well.
“I think it would be our intent to vote the budgets as contingent budgets either way, The entire town and school budget as contingent,” he said. “If it fails on May 17 [as a ballot question], we have to come back and vote a budget, as well as it would be a rejection of the School Committee’s budget. We’re not sure exactly which way we’re going to go yet.”
South Shore Tech also has to keep a wary eye on school budget votes around its district, according to Evans.
“If Whitman and Hanson reject it, and one other town rejected it – there’s a lot of overrides on the table this year, that’s quite possible – their budget would also fail,” he said. “Actually, we’d need four of their nine towns to fail for SST to be rejected.”
Connolly said it seems as though select boards are not having honest conversations about what it reasonably costs to educate a child.
“In our history of our relationship with the towns, it has never been the question of anybody in the selectmen’s offices – are we really educating kids to go on and have great educations and good foundations?” she asked. “That’s really concerning, because it’s not a number. It’s a whole entire life, a foundation for every job they’re going to get.”
Szymaniak said, to be fair, neither town gave him a number to keep to.
“I just presented them with what was needed this year and neither town has said no,” he said.
Kara Moser, using a special education tuition line item, which doesn’t even reflect all placements because they are funded by grants and programs outside the budget, such as federal grants and circuit-breakers, as well as charter school costs. It also shows charter school reimbursement is down
“I think a lot of the chatter … is ‘Just stay within your budget,” she said adding that the district is given requirements for populations of our students that we don’t have an option to “lean down,” Moser said.
“The only option is it gets cut from other places,” she said.
Kniffen said she and Moser attended a Hanson Select Board meeting about the special education, “And I’m not sure it resonated,” Kniffen said. “If your child sees a counselor at school, those are mandated, she said. Schools are mandated to offer such programs – and the funding general education, not special ed and staff.”
Whitman Select Board member Shawn Kain, who has been very active in amassing the town’s budget said he would never want to send the message that the schools are easy to beat up on, as one School Committee member did. The real issue in Whitman is that it has only taken in about $1 million in revenue above last year.
“Just the district’s assessment [increase] is $1.8 million, so you can see how we’re in a difficult bind, just on what we can naturally afford,” Kain said. “I think you’re all good people, and I think you’re practical and logical, and if the override failed, I would respect your opinion and figure out how we can do this together.”
With one budget, if the override fails, a special town meeting would be needed anyway, Evans explained.

WHITMAN – The Select Board on Tuesday, March 11voted 3-0 to appoint a tax relief fund and committee to aid elderly and disabled taxpayers.
Committee members Justin Evans and Laura Howe were not present.
Town Administrator Mary Beth Carter said that the assessor had asked on Thursday, Feb. 27 about Whitman Aid Taxation Fund that had been approved under Article 65 of the May 2001 annual Town Meeting.
The provisions, under MGL Ch. 60 Sec. 3D authorizes the town to design and designate a place on municipal tax bills, motor vehicle excise tax bills or a separate form to mail with such bills to permit taxpayer the opportunity to voluntarily check off, donate or pledge and amount not less than $1or other designated amount. The tax bill would be increased by the amount designated, with proceeds to go into an Elderly and Disabled Taxation Fund in order to defray the real estate taxes of elderly and disabled persons of low income.
Donations received must be deposited into a special account in the custody of the treasurer,
Any town setting up such a fund must also form a Taxation Aid Committee consisting of the Board of Assessors Chair, city or town treasurer and three residents appointed by the mayor or select board. The Committee will adopt rules and regulations under which it will carry out its function and to identify recipients of tax aid.
“While this provision was voted in 2001, I can’t find any evidence that a Whitman Aid Taxation Committee was formed,” she stated. “Tonight, I’d like to ask the board to establish a Taxation Aid Committee. If it’s done, then any resident interested in serving on the committee can certainly contact the Select Board.”
“Twenty-four years ago and nothing’s happened,” Select Board Chair Dr. Carl Kowalski said before the board voted to change that.
Resident John Galvin volunteered to serve on the committee as soon as it was voted.
“I did hear about this and I want to commend the assessor’s office for finding this, because this is something I’ve been pushing for for a while,” he said. “The way I understand it, is that is would be like Community preservation, except it’s voluntary.”
Former Select Board Chair Randy LaMattina spoke during the public forum about questions he had for the Town Administrator concerning the schools’ bond position and how it will affect the overall payment for the WMS school project and whether there was any situation where a town employee would work 80 to 90 hours per week without compensation, as he recently saw posted on social media and for an explanation of the animal control officer position in town.
Town Administrator Mary Beth Carter said, regarding his first question that she attended a meeting with the state’s Municipal Finance Oversight Board as the WHRSD needed to contact them to become state-rated, rather than on their own, because the 2022 and the 2023 audits were not available to the district, as they are required to have to go out for bids on the open market. The MFOB approved the district’s request to go out to bid with state-rated bonds, which she said have a better rate than the district’s rating when they last had an active rating.
LaMAttina asked if the rating from MFOB is higher.
“Yes, it is a little higher,” Carter said. “I have a [preliminary] debt schedule right now … we plan on borrowing $30 million in May.” She said she thinks that rating is estimated at 5 percent.
On employee hours, Carter said she was not aware of any employee, whose hours match what LaMattina saw on town social media pages.
LaMattina said he knew there are two ACOs working for Whitman – one during the day and one at night who also covers, asking for information on the position’s pay scale and how it is covered.
Carter said both positions were 19 hours each and Carter confirmed they alternate weekends on call.
“It’s no one that I’m asking about specifically,” he said. “It’s just things I’ve read online and unfortunately, it comes from a person that represents this town, and it’s really bothered me for quite some time.”

HANSON – Back an override or make deep cuts in the budget – that’s a decision being made in town halls around the state this year.
Hanson Town Accountant Eric Kinsherf, who said all town department and school budgets were in, told the Select Board in a budget update at its last meeting on Feb. 25 the facts of budgeting life in town today.
“I’m going to just cut to the chase,” he said. “The best thing for the town to do financially, and maintain all these services, the town would need to vote an override. I’m thinking $2.9 million, and – if that happened – we’d be able to fund this [he said, holding up a sheaf of department budget documents] and we would not be touching any of our reserves, like free cash and so forth.”
An override amount could also go as high as $3.4 million, if new firefighter positions are included.
“It’s not an easy conversation to have,” he said.
“I think we need to have it, because people need to know, if we don’t pass an override, what’s going to happen – not in a threatening way, but in a factual way,” FitzGerald-Kemmett said.
That would bring the override question a $3.4 million one.
The board asked to see something more closely resmbling a final budget with harder numbers for Kinsherf’s next update.
Kinsherf argued there are two ways to decide the matter: Hold another department head working group session at Camp Kiwanee, as they did under the Madden Group’s strategic planning exercises; or give each department a dollar figure and ask them to come up with a budget to match it.
The bottom line is, if the override fails, the town would be see its reserves reduced to dangerously low levels and cutting services, Kinsherf said.
Town Administrator Lisa Green said the impact of an override failure would be devastating.
“All town departments, basically, are already operating on a minimal staff,” Green said. “So, this level of budget cuts is going to result in a loss of staff. The loss of staff is going to require office hours to be reduced significantly – 36 full-time employees will lose their jobs. That is taking most of the departments here in the town of Hanson, and putting them down to, maybe, one person.”
Select Board Chair Laura FitzGerald-Kemmett asked if the $2.9 million included in those new positions Fire Chief Robert O’Brien Jr., has said his department needs.
“No. It does not,” Kinsherf replied, “That would have to be a separate vote.”
“In talking to the Finance Committee, they would like to have one amount,” FitzGerald-Kemmett said, “Is there a way you could work on getting that [included]?”
Kinsherf said that, if the Select Board wished, he could add the approximately $348,000 needed for the Fire Department position into the override figure.
“I don’t think we’d have to raise all that on the residents right away,” he said. “I think the chief is going to get a grant for the first three years.’
FitzGerald-Kemmett said O’Brien doesn’t know if it will happen or not.
“There’s no easy way to even do it, because it’s going to be impactful” Kinsherf said, recommending, as an alternative, using $1.1 million from free cash and cutting $1.8 million from the existing requests, including the schools. He said it would be hard to identify that many budget reductions.
“Mathematically, that would work, and the $1.8 million would include the schools, because the [W-H] schools are asking for a $1.1 million increase. If the town departments had to take that whole $7.8 million, it would not be good,” he said searching for a word to adequately describe the impact.
Thinking of contingency plans, Kinsherf said, a $1.1 million draw from free cash would leave the town with $1.1 million in unappropriated free cash and $1.7 million in the stabilization fund – or all the town’s reserves – forcing the need to drain those reserves almost to zero if the schools insisted on the full amount of their assessments.
Board member Joe Weeks, knowing the Select Board has already asked the question – asked if the rest of the town’s operating budget is limited to a 2.5 percent increase, how big an increase does the W-H school budget pose for Hanson?
Taking the non-fixed budget, Kinsherf said he calculated the school increase to be about a 9-percent increase.
The schools make up 47 percent of Hanson’s overall budget.
“To be fair to the schools, their total budget is only projected to go up 5.7 percent,” Kinsherf said. “But they’re in the same situation as we are … their state aid is next to zero [in terms of an increase].”
FitzGerald-Kemmett said the Select Board has a limited, if any influence on how the School Committee votes on a budget. They’ve had discussions with the Committee on the effect of school increases on town budgets in the past, as well.
“We really haven’t had a lot of success in partnering with the School Committee and with the district on tempering the spending there,” she said.
She acknowledged that they have no control over how the school budget reflects the Committee’s role in funding the education of the town’s children, but asked Green how they could handle the money the Select Board does control.
Green repeated that about 36 full-time positions will be lost.
“Everything has to be on the table,” she said. “It’s unfortunate because, again, we’re already operating with a minimal staff. Many offices only have two people, some have three … but all departments are going to be impacted in some way.”
Green said voters have to be aware of how budgeting works.
“People don’t understand that, once these cuts are made, and they go to the Senior Center the next day to find it closed, you can’t just say, ‘Oh, I didn’t realize that was going to happen, let’s put the money back,’” she said. “It can’t happen like that.”
She explained that, once services are cut, they are gone until the town goes through the whole process to bring them back with funding.
“These are services – and [Senior Center Director] Mary Collins is a perfect example of this – people need us,” Green said. “They need town services. Maybe people don’t realize it right away. You might not need us today, but you could possibly need us tomorrow.”
She had another question for people looking for the services after an override failure.
“Who are they going to turn to?” Green asked. “It’s not just Senior, it’s Highway.”
Weeks said he wasn’t certain the town even has 36 people they can cut, and said they’ve been through this before. Last year, positions were cut, only to be brought back at the October Town Meeting.
“I remember being very adamant that I didn’t want to bring them back because I knew we’d find ourselves right back to where we are now, where we’re talking about cutting things again,” he said.
Kinsherf was asked what decimating the cash reserves in an attempt to balance the budget do to the town’s bond ratings, but he was also concerned what would happen if the town needed those cash reserves.
“This is a little like DEFCON 5 on the budget cycle,” he said. “Good thing we have the reserves, because, if not, it would be even worse.”
FitzGerald-Kemmett asked what would happen if there was a catastrophic event after the town had tapped into its reserves.
Kinsherf said the town would need special permission from the Department of Revenue Division of Local Services to deficit spend and would have to go before the Emergency Finance Board and most likely placed under some type of receivership. Bonding companies would also likely put Hanson on a watch list if its reserves were low.
“I don’t want to over-dramatize it,” he said. “That’s what it is.”
Asked how the town got to this spot, Kinsherf reminded the board of past use of free cash. His first year on the job the town used $478,000 of that one-time money to fund the budget. Last year’s budget was balanced using $1 million in free cash plus $1.2 million in unused article money from past years.
“We have to make up that $1.2 million this year,” he said. Realistically, he said the override would be good for about three years unless something structurally changes the way it does business.
“It’s a misnomer that, over the years the budget’s been mishandled,” Weeks said. “We are on top of it.” He lauded Kinsherf for finding funds where no one had thought to look before.
“It was underneath the couch cushions and underneath those cushions,” he said. “It is not a manner of mismanagement. It is not a matter of money mismanagement. We just don’t have the dollars.”