As both towns approved overrides to move on to the May 17 ballots, there are still wrinkles in the situation that could complicate things, especially if the override fails in Hanson.
Whitman and Hanson also vote on candidates for town offics when polls open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. in Whitman and from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. in Hanson.
“I think it’s important that the people in both towns understand that we, as a School Committee have authority over the school budget,” Vice Chair Hillary Kniffen said during the Wednesday, May 7 School Committee meeting. “In Hanson, they voted a contingency budget.”
Kniffen had said at the Monday, May 5 Town Meeting that, if the override failed to pass, that did not mean the cuts quoted by the Hanson Finance Committee for all departments would apply to the School Committee budget.
“I was told, ‘Then, your budget just isn’t passed,’” she said. “I didn’t make a thing of it.” She added that Finance Chair Kevin Sullivan reaffirmed that was the town’s position.
“I guess my point is, if they overrides fail, the way the budget lines were in Hanson was that [there would be a predetermined amount to be cut from each department to balance the budget,]” she said. “It’s important that we all understand that doesn’t mean that the School Department is making any cuts. We are back at another Town Meeting. We are the ones who have the final say on our assessment and on our budget.”
Kniffen said that left it on the School Committee’s doorstep to get the word out and work to pass the override.
“I think there is a misunderstanding … perhaps because [in Hanson] there were two numbers voted,” she said. “There are people who think that the School Department will lose $940,000, not understanding that then it goes to Whitman and there’s a cost associated there as well.”
She said it is an important point to let folks know.
Member Kara Moser said that $940,000 would directly impact WHRSD because they do not have the power to take any of that amount out of the vocational school budgets, referring to South Shore Tech in Hanover , Norfolk County Agricultural Vocational in Walpole and Bristol County Agricultural Vocational high schools. One student attends Bristol County Agricultural at a cost of between $28,000 to $30,000 plus transportation.
“That sounds like there might be some reason to talk to Mr. Szymaniak about signing off on everybody going where they want,” said Committee member Stephanie Blackman.
“You can’t – that’s FAPE,” Kniffen said. “We would be violating FAPE – it’s the law. FAPE means Free Access to Public Education. Every student in the state of Massachusetts is entitled to a public education that they see suits and fits their needs. We don’t have the authority to do that, we would be hit with a lawsuit in a second.
“It’s a ton of money… It’s beyond us,” she said. “It’s at the state level. How are you letting a school charge this much for tuition?”
Comment from the vocational schools re per student costs and why there is such a difference.
According to Foundation Budget Rate data from the DESE Office of School Finance, part of the reason vocational schools’ per-pupil costs are higher is because they have to pay their teachers more, particularly in shop classrooms.
“Since ed reform, the state funding formula has always assumed that vocational education is more expensive than traditional education,” SST Superintendent-Director Dr. Thomas J. Hickey said Monday. “Based on FY26 foundation budget rates, the state expects the minimum per pupil cost for a vocational student to be around $5,500 more per pupil [than a non-vocational high school student]. In addition, our equipment and capital [expenses] are a larger share of our budget. When we give our towns an assessment, we assess them for any operating debt and capital all in one number.”
School equipment is expensive, and teachers’ salary scale at vocational schools must be reflective of industry pay, according to Hickey. For example, he said that first year vocational teachers are hired at a higher salary than first-year academic teachers.
“In a tight labor market we need to be mindful of industry wage levels in order to recruit skilled professionals to teach in our vocational areas,” Hickey said.
“There are students who are not built for a traditional school like this, and for us to say no to those students would be doing them a disservice,” Kniffen said.
Ferro said he recalled from back when he was a principal there were specific towns that tried to put caps on students that were allowed to go to vocational [schools], and there were towns that simply did not let vocational schools have access to the middle schools when they were in eighth grade.
“That has been challenged,” he said. “There are DESE (Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) regulations about what we can and cannot do and what we have to do in order to [admit] students in the member towns attend.”
There are only nine agricultural-vocational schools in the state and students had been limited to attend one in their region, but four or five years ago that changed to permit students who feel they are uniquely qualified for a program offered only at a specific vocational school. Sending towns are required to fund transportation for those students.
Agricultural-Vocational schools operate under different regulations, Hickey said, echoing Ferro’s point on acceptance regulations.
“In no way do I want to limit the opportunities for students to attend vocational schools,” Moser said. “I certainly wouldn’t argue that a student with a disability should not get the services that they are fully and legally entitled to. Charter schools I could have a longer conversation about, but for a certain population, I think that it is an appropriate [avenue]. My argument is more about the fact that when town boards propose a budget cut for the school department, which is technically not in their prevue that that cut is not coming out of any of those places [but] is coming out of the majority of the experience of our student population who are housed in the buildings in our two towns. It’s not equitably distributed,”
Rosemary Hill said fellow Committee member Christopher Marks’ illustration of what cuts would mean – a child doing a math problem and scribbling it out in frustration, told if a pair, was not given another piece of paper, but would have to take the limited supplies because the budget fell short.
“That was a small thing in a bigger picture of lots of small things,” she said. “Just fund us to be competitive.
Chair Beth Stafford argues that the school district is it’s own municipality in the way it had to fund faculty and staff benefits and salaries that town-connected districts fund in the town’s budget.
Regional vocational schools budget the same way.
During the Public Comment period, Erin O’Donnell, of 207 Waltham St., in Hanson, spoke about the override being only level-funded.
“We need to plan for the future and increase and staff programs in the schools,” she said, noting cuts to the budget over the past 20 to 30 years, which has been detrimental to students. “But, first we have to pass the override.”
In other business, Business Manager Stephen Marshall reported that a short-term borrowing of 10 months was needed, maturing in March 2026, until the final two district audits for fiscal 2023 and 2024 are complete, as two potential bidders for the initial borrowing for Whitman Middle School by state-qualified bonds backed out because the audits were incomplete. He said those audits are expected to be completed before the borrowing matures, when the district can again seek state-qualified bonds.
The committee voted to approve that borrowing to pay costs for the WMS project under MA General Laws Ch 70B.
Committee member Dawn Byers asked what the risk was.
“It feels really heavy,” she said.
“There’s no greater risk here than the bond,” Marshall said. “We need it to borrow anyway. The risk is if our audits are not complete and we’re not able to go back out to borrow in addition [the building could stop]. That’s always the risk.”
“It’s a bridge loan,” said Committee member Glen DiGravio. “It’s a loan until we get a loan.”
The 2022 audit delayed the following two, because that was the year the district was recovering from the data breach of 2022.
Marshall outlined the third-quarter revenue report as well.
The 2024 year-ending excess & deficiency balance through March 31 was $616,288.77.
Fiscal 2025 end-of-year budget line transfers will be calculated and ready for votes at the next full School Committee meeting.
Chapter 70 aid is expected to be $261,516 greater than what ha been budgeted, Marshall said, but added that Charter School reimbursement is expected to be $120,203 less that forecast.
“Every time they give us money, they quickly take it away,” he said. Regional transportation reimbursement is still unknown.
“There is some fiscal 2026 budget workings that include the FY 25 transportation numbers, so as the budget went through the House and Senate, and pulling some of the money out of the “millionaire’s tax” some [lawmakers] have asked for it to help us in this year, and some have asked for it to be fully [budgeted] for ’26,” Marshall said. “We still don’t know how that’s going to land.”
Medicare reimbursement is expected to be $95,000 less than budgeted.
“When you add those things up, we’re still within our budget,” he said. “I don’t expect us to be under budget on revenue.”

HANSON – Officials in both Whitman, which has held two public informational forums this week, with one more planned – and in Hanson, where a second forum was held Thursday morning, two days after its first forum Tuesday night.
Hanson’s final override informational forum will be held at 6:30 p.m., Wednesday, April 30, again at Hanson Middle School.
Town officials held the first of three planned informational forums concerning the $3 million operational override for the fiscal 2026 budget. The next one will be held at 9 a.m., April 24 in the Hanson Multi-Service Senior Center, which operates out of the building it shares with the Hanson Public Library at Maquan and School Street.
“Hanson is asking for a $3 million increase in the tax levy,” said Town Administrator Lisa Green. “What this [override] does is allow the hiring of four additional firefighters. … It allows for a sustainable budget by eliminating the [the need to use all the free cash to balance budgets]of $1.061 million in free cash, which helps our bond rate.”
“It’s a big ask, it’s a heavy lift,” Select Board Chair Laura FitzGerald-Kemmett said. “We know that. We don’t take this lightly at all, but the dire circumstances of what could happen if we do not ask for this are something we felt would be irresponsible if we didn’t ask for this override.
“But, again, it’s up to the voters at Town Meeting and its up to people at the ballot,” she said.
A woman from Lakeside road asked why the override had not been advertised sooner.
“There’s hardly anyone here tonight and this forum wasn’t posted until the other day,” she said. “A lot of people do not use computers and some don’t even look at the newspaper. This is very important to the town to come together and find out how all of you are working to get our budget under control.”
“Other than newspapers, Facebook, online, volunteer people that are trying to get the information out every single week – I don’t know what else we can do,” Select Board Vice Chair Ann Rein said. “If you’re that passionate about it, please come and get involved. We are not trying to hide anything from anybody.”
It also gives the town better credit rating when the town has to borrow. Article 5 on the Town Meeting warrant is the non-override budget and Article 6 is the budget including an override. The ballot question on the override will appear on the Saturday, May 17 ballot.
“The better your credit, the lower your interest rates,” she said. “This will avert all reductions in services.”
The cost of no
Among those proposed reductions which would be negated with the override would be:

• Approximately $940,000 for the W-H Regional School District;
• $130,000 for the facilities manager and internet technology;
• The loss of $160,000 would mean the loss of one police officer and a firefighter;
• $130,000 for facilities manager and IT for the town;
• $160,000 in public safety cuts eliminates one police officer and one firefighter;
• $216,000 means three needed police cruisers;
• $73,000 eliminates one full-time Highway Department position; and other expenses, which incudes snow and ice removal, road grader;
• $27,000 cut would mean a reduction in transportation hours;
• $49,000 cut from the Health budget; Council on Aging, library funding.
  The town website’s budget pages feature a budget calculator with which residents calculate the impact an override could affect them and how many overrides have passed.
  “There’s a lot of chatter out there about all the overrides Hanson has asked for over the years,” Green said. “The town has asked for and received a number of overrides, many have been for the schools, some for the general operation – a majority of them under laws that meant basically, not passed.”
  During the session, which lasted about 40 minutes, moderated by Town Administrator Lisa Green. She was joined by Town Accountant Eric Kinsherf, School Committee Vice Chair Hillary Kniffen, Fire Chief Robert O’Brien Jr., Police Chief Michel Miksch, Highway Director Richard Jasmin, Select Board Chair Laura FitzGerald-Kemmett, Vice Chair Ann Rein and members Ed Heal and Joe Weeks.
  “This forum is information only, for questions regarding the override,” Green told those attending. “This is not a forum for arguing or providing your opinion for or against an override. That is for Town Meeting, and that is found at the Town Election.”
  “We’re looking back to 1989 here, so it’s important to note that, if we look back to 2005, there’s been three overrides have passed,” Which can counter the old argument,” FitzGerald-Kemmett said. Information available from the state on these points is data-based.
  Handouts containing updated town budgetary documents, including tax relief program for seniors and veterans were made available as well as information from the school district and the survey, which closes by the end of the week. Results of the Bridgewater State University override survey will be discussed at the Tuesday, April 29 Select board meeting.
  The program began with the basics.
  The town is allowed by law to increase its tax levy – the amount of taxes a town can assess and collect from town residents – by 2.5 percent each year. Any new taxable development can also be added to that number. Only town residents can override that levy limit.
  Town revenue sources are taxes on real estate and personal property, state aid sources, local program reimbursements, local receipts such as meals taxes, motor vehicle excise taxes and investment income free cash, stabilization, permit and license fees,
  “Hanson is funded predominantly with property taxes,” Green said of tax information handed out. Those property taxes make up 85 percent of Hanson’s operating revenue. Local receipts make up 9 percent, and local aid is down to 6 percent.
  Where the fiscal 2026 town budget is concerned, general government – mainly the offices working in Town Hall – make up 7 percent of the annual budget. Fire and police – public safety services is 26 percent of Hanson’s budget. But there is some financial “sunshine,” in the town’s low debt percentage of just 1 percent. Employment benefits make up 16 percent of the budget.
  Library and recreational services make up only 2 percent of the budget, and human services – the Council on Aging and Board of Health makes up 1 percent of the budget expenses for Hanson. Public Works is 5 percent of Hanson’s budget.
  Education costs comprise 48 percent of Hanson’s budget in fiscal ’26.
  The forum then took questions from those attending, WHCA-TV was recording the session last night, but was not live streaming. The forum will be posted on YouTube and rebroadcast on the Hanson government access channel in a few days.
  Kinsherf answered one resident’s question about the permanence of 2.5 percent increases in the levy. He said that does indeed compound each year.
  A resident of Lakeside road sought assurance that the override would mean services to private roads will continue under an override, so home values would not be impacted by a lack of road maintenance.
  FitzGerald-Kemmett assured him that, with an override, such road maintenance will continue.
  What departments need
  Green then handed the microphone to Kniffen, O’Brien an Miksch for closing thoughts.
  “It’s important to note that the schools are just asking for a level-services budget,” Kniffen said. “We are not asking to add any programs or any more services for students, but just maintain what we have.”
  Fire Chief O’Brien said his department is asking for something in the fiscal 2026 budget.
  “Last year, we had over 900 runs” he said. “It was simultaneous calls in the town of Hanson. Right now, almost 50 percent of the calls that we do are simultaneous calls. … So what we’re looking for four firefighter/paramedics to be hired.”
  As soon as they can get the second ambulance on the road, that gives the department another ambulance on the road to answer emergency calls until the advanced life support ambulance, which requires a crew of four returns from a hospital.
  Police Chief Miksch pointed to the changes in policing during his 30 years on the job.
  “What am I asking for? My status quo,” he said. “I don’t want to lose any officers. For the first time since COVID, we’re fully staffed. If I’m not fully staffed that means less officers on the road.”
  The time on a call is a lot longer today, as officers are responsible for a lot more things.
  The Highway Department is also looking to be fully staffed, avoiding the expense of contracting out work a fully staffed department would not need to use.
  Senior Center Director Mary Collins said the center’s ability to bring back the adult supportive day program, which will be able to return to offering services five daya a week when the new modular unit arrives next month.
  “We’re a small department,” she said, noting it takes up only four-tenths of 1 percent (.4 percent) of the town budget. “We rarely ask for more than that, knowing that we have other departments that are in need.
  Collins, too, is seeking level funding — which in her department’s case is only $12,000.

WHITMAN – If the people don’t know what’s going to happen when they say no to an override, they’re going to say no.
High Street resident John Galvin argued at the Tuesday, April 15 Select Board meeting that the success or failure of the override question hinges on fully informing voters.
“It won’t be pretty when the override fails, but in my opinion, it will unless you get the information out there of what services might get affected and how bad it’s going to be,” Galvin said. “Because people are just going to say, ‘Oh, they say that every year. It’s never going to happen.”
This year, the board’s contingency budget doesn’t mean, as it has in the past, an alternate plan for expending revenue in the event the override question fails – it means how the financial pain will be felt by town employees in the form of job losses if that happens, and how the public could see the resulting loss of services. But specific jobs at risk have not been listed.
The budget was, in fact, the only item of business on the agenda.
All of them will result in a variety of reductions to the town’s current staffing levels.
“If the override does not pass, the only option to balance the budget and close the deficit for fiscal 2026 is to reduce staffing,” said Town Administrator Mary Beth Carter, who stressed that services would be reduced before the town resorted to that. Carter said she has considered several different Fiscal ’26 contingency scenarios over the past few weeks.
“At this time, all options are being considered, however, all of the options, of course, are less than ideal,” she said adding that the reductions will, in turn, impact the services residents of Whitman currently receive.
“Departmental budgets will be scaled back to a minimum level before staffing reductions are considered. It’s our intention to keep any reductions in staffing and reductions to services to a minimum level, however the town could be facing reductions of up to 14 positions across the various town departments.”
High Street resident John Galvin said, with Town Meeting in three weeks, the Select Board must decide as quickly as possible, the details of such reductions.
“The people need to know, the voters need to know, the taxpayers need to know,” he said. “What happens if we vote no? The department heads need to know, the personnel need to know.”
Select Board member Shawn Kain, who is a member of the budget working group, argued that, while on one hand it’s good to know what services could be potentially lost, but to be respectful to people he doesn’t believe in putting people’s professional fate public.
Kain said there could be a couple of different strategies with an override such as trying to get the most shock value.
“I don’t support that,” he said. “I think if we have to put together a contingency plan – and it’s going to be about 14 full-time employees – I think we try to do it in the least impactful way possible.”
Carter said there are different ways departments could feel the effects of budget cuts if the override fails, such as expense lines, where she has “pulled everything back before we take the last step to reduce staff.”
“You have tiny departments – Planning Board and Bylaw Study Committee, little departments like that that we can make any adjustments in – but all the major departments will have some reductions in expenses, of course, or in staffing.”
Kain noted that there has been some discussion online about the use of free cash.
“I feel like we have some use of free cash that’s in line with our financial policy, embedded in the budget – about $340,000 in free cash – and for me, I think those are acceptable uses, because it’s short-term use. It’s not paying for personnel and regular budgetary items,” he said. “I would not support the use of free cash beyond what we currently have in the budget. I will not.”
He said it’s not meant to be a shock or scare tactic.
Carter said she had talked with John Adams of the accounting department, who is a former financial director, on Tuesday, who stressed and she knows as well, that free cash is one-time money that should not be used for recurring expenses.
Even with the $2 million override, she said the town is looking at a deficit of $1.8 million in fiscal 2027 ($2.6 million without an override), and a $3.9 million deficit for 2028.
“One of the reasons that we’re in the situation we’re in this year is because we used free cash last year,” she said. “If we were ever to use a large amount of free cash this year … it’s not even a Band-Aid. It’s a bad fiscal move.”
Free cash is the number one funding source for capital needs and using it to balance the budget would deplete that source.
“If you just start going down that path, using free cash to close the budget … auditors would not look [favorably] on that,” she said. Rating agencies also take that into consideration when deciding the town’s bond rating and the town could be downgraded in the future, leading to higher rates if the town needs to borrow in the future.
The $340,000 Kain mentioned is intended to used toward the Plymouth County Pension liability, that is expected to be paid off in 2030. Once that is paid up it will free up quite a bit of money in Whitman’s budget annually, which she then would like to see diverted to the other post-employment benefits [OPEB] liability, currently $140,000 a year paid from meals tax revenues, and some could be used in the regular budget. The pay-off of both liabilities also factors into the town’s bond rating calculations.
Select Board member Justin Evans said that, if Town Meeting supports the Select Board budget May 5, they will be waiting for the override ballot question result on May 17.
“If it passes, we have a balanced budget,” he said. “If it doesn’t, we have to start looking at these scenarios. But the clock really starts when the School Committee has 30 days to reassess the towns because they now have a rejected regional school budget. I imagine they’d do it sooner.”
The town would have 45 days to call a special Town Meeting at that point.
“The same process works for [South Shore Tech] if all four towns that have overrides on the ballot that are [SST] members, fail to pass a [SST] budget, [they’ll] do the same thing,” he said. “I don’t want to get into specifics right now to scare departments, but I think only … draft cuts number three scenario is even workable as a town – as devastating as it would be to all of our departments.”
He made a motion to recommend that scenario going forward.
“I think we deserve to start preparing for the worst because, right now, an override’s probably 50-50 at best,” Evans said.
Vice Chair Dan Salvucci, who was directing the meeting in the absence of Chair Dr. Carl Kowalski, said he would prefer to wait for a full board to decide that.
Police Chief Timothy Hanlon and Fire Chief Timothy Clancy offered a glimpse of the effect cuts could have in their departments as about five public safety job losses are anticipated if the override fails.
“For public safety, we think worst-case scenario first,” Hanlon said. “That’s the bleak outlook that we have to face now.” He said his department hasn’t been level serviced since at least 2012.
“In 2017, the townspeople spoke to increase our staffing from the 1970s [levels],” Clancy said. “Now that we’re being faced with the challenge of decreasing that staffing, it’s super disheartening. … If we start losing people, we start losing ambulances. If we start losing ambulances, we start losing revenue. When does it stop? … I’ve sworn to protect this town and I have to have the people to do it.”
Kain noted that the schools have not outlined specifics of the job cuts they anticipate other than that they want to stay away from elementary grade cuts with “a little at the middle schools and high school.”
“They deliberately left out the details because right now, for one, there’s a lot to be considered,” he said. “We don’t know how to calculate what we’re going to be up against because we don’t know exactly what the number is. Period.”
On Wednesday, April 9, the School District had outlined the effect an override failure will have in the schools.

WHITMAN – Meeting on Monday night, the Select Board voted to place an override article on the Town Meeting warrant for a $2 million, one-year article.
Board member Shawn Kain had made a compromise motion first to support a $2 million override for one year that gained no support.
Member Justin Evans suggested a one-year override at $2.4 million, at which Chair Dr. Carl Kowalski passed the gavel to Vice Chair Dan Salvucci so he could second Evans’ motion. It received a deadlocked 2-2 vote with Kowalski and Evans voting yes and Salvucci and Kain voting no.
Kain restated his motion and, again, Kowalski passed the gavel to second it.
This time, the one-year $2 million override motion passed by a 3-1 vote, with only Salvucci voting no.
But they first had to clear up a resident’s issue with the meeting’s agenda.
Resident John Galvin had spoken during the public forum, objecting to what he called a decision “made behind closed doors” not to include the agenda item attendees and viewers “were expecting … discussing the difference” between a three-year and a one-year override.
Kowalski immediately countered Galvin’s assertions.
“I’ve got a long list of where you were off in your remarks,” Kowalski said. He countered that there was an agenda item for a budget update as well as Galvin’s concern that the override amounts would not be covered.
“What we plan to do tonight is to discuss whether the Select Board goes along with the one-year advice of the Finance Committee, or whether it changes it to three years. We haven’t had that discussion yet. That will happen tonight.”
But Galvin countered that all three options for a ballot article involved one-year overrides that would not solve Whitman’s fiscal dilemma.
“All three of those amounts do not get the job done,” he said.
“I totally agree with you, as far as that’s concerned,” Kowalski replied. “However, the [Select Board] was ready last week … and the Finance Committee went off after we had the joint meeting and they made their decision. We haven’t had a chance to discuss it as a board since that time.”
When the time to vote came, Kowalski said he was moved by Shawn [Kain] and Justin [Evans] in their advocating for a one-year override. He had favored three-years.
“I think that one-year is the way to go however, I’m really hoping that Shawn does some serious thinking right now about the $2.4 million,” he said. “That’s the only way we’re even going to come close to doing anything next year.”
He said he is also not convinced that the town would vote it down.
“I’ve seen the town be generous a lot over the course of my years here and I have faith in it,” Kowalski said.
Town Administrator Mary Beth Carter said the actual language and amount sought does not need to be printed exactly on the agenda to be discussed. The Select Board only needs to have the amount they do vote for to the Town Clerk by April 10.
Once the discussion turned to the meat of the issue – a one-year override, or two, or even three.
Carter said she felt the responsible thing to do would be to look at the numbers that I did fold into the override side and enter a figure that would carry the town for three years.
For example, entering a $1.7 million override, Whitman will have about $2,000 left over in town’s excess levy account this year, In 2027, the shortfall would be $895,000 short in 2028 of a little over $2 million.
She replied to Evans’ question that the numbers assume Town Meeting will support using Articles 19 and 20, to use free cash to pay the retirement assessment and OPEB.
Evans supported a $2.4 million override because he didn’t like assuming Town Meeting would back the use of free cash and he doesn’t expect the four union negotiations still have not concluded and he expressed concern that they all would be before Town Meeting.
“I’m a little concerned about the economic outlook next year,” Evans said. “It is still a one-year override, using the deficit we projected weeks ago.”
For a $2 million override, she based calculations on $302,000 in excess levy this year and be short $587,000 next year and $1.8 million short in 2028. Likewise, a $2.4 million override would be $702,000 in excess levy next year and short about $177,000 next year. And $1.7 million in 2028.
“I do understand the point of keeping it short as well, but the difference between a $1.7 million override and a $2.4 million override on the average home [$495,736.78] in fiscal 2025, is a difference of $10.87 a month or $130.44 a year. The increase in taxes is $316.76.
“I think it’s very important that, if we’re going to ask the people of the town to sacrifice, that we show them how we’ll sacrifice,” said Kain. “I don’t think it’s irresponsible to ask for a number that’s slightly less or less than what we need over the next three years. … In some sense, that’s kind of our skin in the game.”
He advocated that the smallest override in one year has the highest chance of passing.
“That, I’d be really grateful for, and the employees of the town would be really grateful for, and we can do a lot with that money,” Kain said. “I’d feel terrible to ask more and get nothing.”
Member Justin Evans said he’d been listening to the Finance Committee discourse on the night they addressed the merits of a one-year vs a three-year override.
“While I still feel a three-year is the one that makes the most sense financially,” Evans said noting that he appreciated their discussion. “A lot of it was around the practicality of explaining why this is the amount of … and manage that process in the next six weeks.
Evans expressed surprise that the FinCom was unanimous in their vote.
Salvucci, however was just as firm, strongly opposing any override.
“But, I agree [with] one year, the lowest amount [that] we can] get,” he said, arguing that with three-or evan two years, it just opens the doors for town department heads to not control their budgets.
“Whether it’s town budgets or school budgets, if you know exactly what you have to spend, it’s like a family – if you’ve got $100 and you all go out to eat, you don’t go out an buy a $300 meal. You know what you have to spend. … It gets them to do their budgets based on what they need and not what they want. Call me cheap, but that’s how I think.”
Kowalski also challenged that statement on the FinCom directing the town’s financial agenda.
“That’s not what happened last year,” Kowalski said. “What happened last year was that the Finance Committee took over the Town Meeting – in a way that they can – and they voted to do it a totally different way than we had suggested.”
Finance Committee Chair Kathleen Ottina agreed that was an accurate summation of what transpired at the 2024 Town Meeting vote on Article 2. The Select Board had recommended an override and the FinCom sought to fill the gap with free cash. But, she noted, both boards have been working much more closely together this year.
She said there was some support for a three-year override on the Finance Committee before they voted, but members were swayed by Evans’ comment that, statistically voters do not support overrides.
They felt a one-year override stood the best chance of passing.
“We’d hate to risk going for the fiscally responsible three-year override and get nothing,” she said, hoping local receipts increase, some financing from the state increase and Chapter 70 increases, among other fiscal changes.

WHITMAN – The town has a new Free Cash policy.
The Select Board, on Tuesday, March 25, voted to support the new policy recommended by Town Administrator Mary Beth Carter, which will establish a budgetary policy for the use of free cash which includes –
Place 10 percent of the certified free cash amount, each fiscal year, allocated to the capitalization stabilization fund – not to be expended in the first year – but as a savings account that we’re slowly and steady adding to; and then, another 10 percent, especially after the remaining balance of the certified Free Cash amount would be added to the general stabilization fund each year; and we discussed placing a minimum of $200,000 each fiscal year be transferred from Free Cash to Plymouth County Retirement line until the undfunded liability is paid off; and a minimum of $140,000 each fiscal year, shall be transferred to the Article 2 line for “Other Post Employment Benefits.
The policy will begin this year.
“I think that, if we follow this every year, we are going to build a capital stabilization fund in the way that we should,” she said. “That money is not be touched. The towns that touch, the general stabilization fund are the towns that find themselves in trouble. Once they open that, and start going after that, they have nothing.”
She wanted to start the policy to build up some “good reserves” because the town needs a new fire engine, and an upgrade to financial software for starters.
“I think that this will put us on a good road for the future, if we just do this every single year,” she said.
“It sounds like a good plan,” Vice Chair Dan Salvucci said.
Board member Shawn Kain said that, when one looks at the towns that withstand some of these difficult times, and the ones that get into trouble, it’s the ones that have their financial policies set in place as the “rudder that keeps them on track.”
“There might be some difficult decisions in the future because of this, if we follow that plan it should keep us on solid financial ground,” he said.
Member Justin Evans noted that. “The unstated part of the policy will mean that 75-percent of certified free cash would be the town’s capital plan year after year.”
Whitman 150 update
Whitman 150 Committee Chair Richard Rosen also briefed the board on planned events for the towns sesquicentennial.
“Things are going very well, Rosen said. “We’re selling merchandise. There’s a lot of people buying … stuff,” Rosen said. “We want part of what will ultimately be history.”
He reminded residents that the kickoff dinner, scheduled for Saturday, April 5 at the Cardinal Spellman Center, and tickets will not be available at the door. To obtain tickets, priced at $50 each, are still available. Interested residents must contact Rosen’s office at 781- to obtain individual tickets wo reserve tables of eight or 10.
On Sunday, April 27, the burial of another time capsule on the Town Hall lawn, will overseen by former Fire Chief Tinothy Grenno and Thomas Burnett, who helped lower the 2000 event capsule on that same lawn during the centennial celebration.
A series of photos published by the Brockton Enterprise, at the time, shows Grenno and Burnett lower the time capsule into the hole made by a DPW crew.
“I found them both and asked if they’d [come back] and they both said yes,” Rosen said.
The centennial time capsule is slated to be disinterred in 2075 and the new one will be dug up in 2100.
“That way, we figured nobody would still be alive when they dig it up,” Rosen joked.
If people have items they would like to place in the time capsule, they should drop the items off at North Easton Savings Bank, Bedford St.
“North Easton Savings Bank has been extremely good to us in terms of donating money, time effort, volunteers – they’ve been great,” Rosen said.
Wondering how big items one might want to donate for the time capsule can be accommodated?
“I think anything much bigger than a shoebox isn’t that great,” Rosen said. “But I do need, like, a persons listed book and stuff like that, that after 75 years, people are going to look at it and go, ‘Wow!’ or whatever they’ll say.”
Rosen said there’s an important contest going on in the schools right now, as students in kindergarten through grade eight write essays – for the older grades, and photos for the younger children – on the theme: “Wonderful Whitman.”
Winners, chosen by teachers, will have their work placed in the time capsule, and they will be present when the time capsule is lowered – and more. Rosen said.
North Easton Savings will present the winning students with a bank account, which some have never had, and they’ll be invited to march in the parade on June 27.
The cornhole tournament signup list is still open.
The roadrace, slated for Sunday, June 8, will start next to the fire station.
“They’re going to come out of the [WWI Memorial] Arch and then do a similar route to all the roadraces that we used to have,” Rosen said.
Runners will be able to signup live on the next couple of days,” he said..
A band concert on June 14, followed by fireworks, and Sunday, June 22, fills out the celebration with a “pretty big parade,” Rosen said. “That’s [parpade] is going to be the final event that we’re doing,” he said. “I do need to set up a joint meeting with the police and fire chiefs and the DPW in the very near future, so they’re not surprised by any of this.”

A library closed, an ambulance and crew lost and with them the certainty of emergency response, a police department still short of staffing needs, and losses of senior center staff in Whitman; deep faculty cuts to district schools — are some possible scenarios if a Proposition 2.5 override fails. Hanson also faces some dire town services outcomes.
Town select boards had long ago accepted that overrides to Proposition 2.5 in Whitman and Hanson would be necessary to overcome deficits that threaten a need for potentially devastating cuts not only for the school district, but also for all town departments. But like many area towns are facing similar budget gaps in excess of $2 million, the only question was how much, of an override for how long and affecting how many years might voters accept?
It appeared that the two Whitman boards had reached a consensus on a three-year override, however, in the Finance Committee following the joint session, the Finance committee deliberated further and unanimously voted to recommend only a one-year override, according to an email sent to the Select Board from FinCom Chair Kathleen Ottina after their meeting, said Select Board member Justin Evans.
Ottina said they had not yet made the decision at the time of the joint meeting with the Select Board, but it was on that night’s agenda.
“We had some informal discussions, but there’s no firm consensus,” she had told the Select Board.
Some of the FinCom members, during the joint meeting had urged a one-year approach [a $2.4 million override] to see if more funding might be forthcoming from the state in the next two years.
“The $2.4 million is what we need for just this year,” said Town Administrator Mary Beth Carter. “If we go with just the one-year override, my fear is that, next year, we would need money, as well.”
The three-year override would be for about $4.2 million, perhaps a little less.
That would give the town a single-year override to cover the town for three years, Carter said, clarifying what a “three-year override” label means.
“It would go into the fiscal year calculation in fiscal year 2026,” she said. “We would have excess levy and we would leave that money on the table and that would roll into ’27 and ’28. That would cover us for three years as opposed to having three separate overrides.”
In the first year, the town would need $2,262,000 with an impact of $421.49 to taxpayers, based on the value of an average single-family home in Whitman of $495,736.78. The additional money flowing in during fiscal 2027 was looking like $370 tax increase for that average home. The third year would see an increase of $198.
The impact to voters is the same in the first year of a three-year override as with a one-year override.
Based on the solid waste costs are projected to go up 6 percent, so that was factored in on the revenue side, as well as unfunded liability for Pymouth County retirement and OPEB costs until that is completely paid.
She advocated the one override that covers the town for three years. rather than the one-year override.
Evans said there was the hope that the budget group and Finance Committee would receive the decision on April 7 on a one-year vs three-year override.
“The amount that the Select Board will put on the ballot [has to be] settled by Monday, April 7,” Evans said as Town Counsel wants to meet with the Select Board in executive session and they are not free on Tuesdays. “We don’t have to have the numbers exactly dialed in today, but we do have to have [the one- or three-year term].”
Kain added that going with a one-year override would put the town short next year and the year after, but is more likely to pass, with no guarantee that would happen, either.
“It’s a big decision,” he said. “A smaller override, that isn’t quite enough and we know we’ll have to cut, or a bigger override that would sustain us three years,” he said.
The Select Board will meet Monday, April 7 to decide that question, after the joint Select Board/Finance Committee meeting that began with an all-around hesitancy to risk more than one year, and ended with a consensus to decide the question next week as both boards were now leaning heavily toward three years after hearing from the police and fire chiefs on the likely effects of cuts that might otherwise be necessary.
That same evening in Hanson, however, found some Select Board members wishing they could separate a schools’ override from a municipal one.
“I wish we could separate the school out,” said Select Board member Ed Heal as the board was returning from an executive session.
“We’re actually going to have a conversation about that,” said Chair Laura FitzGerald-Kemmett.
She said several people have reached out to her to ask why the board wasn’t separating the school override portion from the town’s operational override. She also spoke to Whitman officials to find out how they are handling it.
“If you recall, if both towns don’t handle things correctly, everything gets out of [synch],” she said. “Then we end up in the same situation we were in last year.”
Based on several phone conversations she and Town Administrator Lisa Green had made, Whitman is doing one all-encompassing override as well, for about $2.3 million.
“Their feeling is they don’t want to pit the schools against their town services,” FitzGerald-Kemmett said. “That does not mean we have to do it that way. We could split the question in two, and let’s think through how that would work.”
Vice Chair Ann Rein said that when the questions were split they know that “the emails are going to start flying all over the place from everybody in the school side and they’re going to fear-monger that, and the tone and tenor of the town right now is they don’t want to fund the schools. They don’t want to fund us. They don’t want to fund anybody.”
She doesn’t see separating the overrides is a clarifying way to do solve the issue and FitzGerald-Kemmett agreed.
“When you have a group of individuals devoted to the task – as the Finance Committee is – it’s only the right thing to do to give some deference and some consideration to what their recommendation is,” she said.
Hanson’s Finance Committee is recommending a single override question.
“Any way you look at it,” FitzGerald-Kemmett said. “These [questions] are inextricably linked and, although we have no control over 43 percent of our budget … we’re where we are.”
She advised those against the school budget to stay engaged and reach out to the School Committee to reduce Hanson’s assessment.
This board has no control over the school budget,” she said, outside of pushback about the assessment figure, which they plan to do. The board voted to draft such a letter to the School Committee.
Back in Whitman, meanwhile, Select Board member Shawn Kain provided another budget update, noting that he and board member Justin Evans attended the March 19 School Committee meeting.
“They had some really thoughtful things to say about the school district and some of their struggles,” he said.
Superintendent of Schools Jeff Szymaniak, School Committee Chair Beth Stafford and other members, in turn attended joint FinCom and Select board meeting.
“We’re luck to have them here,” he said.
Finance Chair Kathleen Ottina said the budget working group, which included present and past administrators, representatives from the FinCom and Select board as well as private citizens, had been a great idea.
“This lines of communication have been kept open,” she said. “I’ve learned from Shawn Kain’s thoughtful listening and issues the accounted to his position. He rethinks things, so I’m learning to do the same thing because we have two ears and one mouth. We should be listening twice as much as we talk.”
She said the group has been working very hard on a budget to provide town services and a narrative as to why they are important and what’s at stake if residents opt against supporting it.
“Although this is a difficult conversation, I think the vibe this year is different,” Kain said.
The Fire Department budget looks “pretty tight,” Kain said, and there is a safety concern about the police department’s personnel shortage that is currently leaving shifts unfilled.
Funds have been taken from other departments to be included it in the DPW solid waste line to ensure continuing trash pickup from a public health standpoint.
Who feels the pain
“If the override fails, we will be cutting police, fire DPW, Town Hall staff, Council on Aging will be effected and closing the library.
“It kills me to even say that,” Carter said. “But that is $489,000 and when I’m looking at $1.81 million plus employment costs…”
Fire Chief Timothy Clancy said he was not aware of any of the numbers discussed before the meeting.
“Our budget dramatically impacts the service we can provide this community,” Clancy said. “We’re not staffed to where we need to be – we all know that.” If he loses the four firefighter/paramedics added through the 2017 override, the department goes back to the 1970s.
“That would be shameful,” he said. “I’d have to take an ambulance out of service. … I’m not trying to be sarcastic, but I’m not 100-percent sure I’d be able to able to put anybody at your house from Whitman Fire.”
Since he became Chief of Police, Timothy Hanlon has not had all the officers his department requires.
“We’re still not there yet,” he said. “When we don’t have the resources, that adds stress to an already stressful situation.”
“A million dollars out of a town budget is a big deal,” Kain said. “It’s not as simple as X-amount of salary and one individual. It effects a whole bunch of things, like how many people on a shift.”
The schools would be losing about 21 positions.
“It’s going to hit all of us, and that’s why we all need to be a team,” Stafford said. “If this doesn’t go through, this town’s going to be not what it used to be.”
Szymaniak said the school district has looked at the five-year plan through 2028, and the town’s three-year override covers them.
For risk purposes, because it affects all other departments, Kain said technology would be getting a “slight bump,” contingent on the override.
“That leads us to the critical question, and we should have some discussion first, before we hopefully reach some sort of consensus – should we support a one-year override that’s about $2.4 million?” which Kain said is still a little bit fluid. “A three-year might be at about $4.2 million or it might be a bit less than that.”
Evans noted that it is already difficult to recruit candidates for town positions.
“If we’re going to ask, let’s ask for the one that will sustain us for a couple of years, make a very clear pitch [that] these are the service levels, now, we’re going to raise the levy incrementally … and here’s the projected tax increases,” he said. “It would require more explanation on our part, but it is the more sound fiscal policy.”
Vice Chair Dan Salvucci argued that “overrides are forever.”
“The challenge comes down to what’s the palatability of how we go about this,” said Finance Vice Chair Mike Warner. “We could do three-yearly increments or one three-year increment. The end result is the same, realistically. … The challenge I see here is, what’s the town’s and the taxpayer’s stomach for three separate votes to override, as opposed to one?”
Salvucci said it all comes down to departments’ ability to control their budgets.
FinCom member Mike Flanagan agreed, pointing to recent building ballot questions that had passed, and asked what happened to the marijuana impact money the town was counting on.
“Everyone’s in a jam right now,” he said, noting the number of overrides on town ballots this year. “Maybe the state, within the next couple of years, will loosen up some money because they see all this.”
For those calculations, he favored a one-year override.

HANSON – The Select Board on Tuesday, March 11 voted to form a Library Building Committee the list of proposed members.
Town Administrator Lisa Green reminded the board that the Hanson Public Library had received a grant for a design and planning phase for either the renovation of its space or the construction of a new building.
One of the requirements of the grant, of up to $100,000, is that a committee be created to discuss the project and follow it along, Green said. Another is that the grant funding be spent on the project or the unused portion – plus interest – must be returned.
Library Director Karen Stolfer has submitted a list of names of volunteers who have stepped forward or agreed to do so when asked. They are: Stolfer, Corrine Cofardo, Teresa Santalucia, Linda Wall, Pamela French, Antonio DeFrais, Tom Hickey, Patrick Faella, and Melissa Valcovic.
Stolfer said this week that the committee’s main job will be developing a request for proposals (RFP) for hiring an owner’s project manager (OPM), a task that must be completed by the end of the year – not only because of the grant’s spending deadline, but also because there are at least four other library projects in the state that are ahead in that process.
Once an OPM is hired, they will help in the hiring of an architect.
“Once we have all our documentation in by the end of this year, then the Massachusetts Board of Library Commissioners will make sure we meet their level of design,” she said, noting that the MBLC would decide on the construction grants it will award in February 2026 – which is also the time in which the town’s lawsuit over the MBTA Communities Act could come into play.
“With construction, we’re just not really sure,” Stolfer said. “That is tied into the MBTA issues, so we don’t know if we’re going to be proceeding with construction, depending on what happens with that. … We’re just moving forward in the environment we find ourselves in.”
MBLC works under a funding cap of $25 million per grant round to finance all the projects it approves, much as the Massachusetts School Building Authority makes financial decisions on school projects it funds.
While the Select Board was supportive of the project, there are concerns over how a building committee will be staffed.
“Employees really shouldn’t be voting members of the committee, but certainly [could serve as] supporting members of the committee,” said Select Chair Laura FitzGerald-Kemmett. She also called Cofardo that week to advise her that DeFrais “had limited bandwidth,” but certainly would be supportive, if the committee had specific needs for his assistance.
FitzGerald-Kemmett also reached out to offer her advice that the list of names indicated it was a rather large committee, but limiting Stolfer and DeFrias to advisory roles, the panel becomes a little smaller.
“The one thing that I would urge you guys to think about, is I know these people have expressed an interest, but I think it’s just as vital to get an at-large member coming in with fresh eyes, that’s going to look at this in the same way as an average taxpayer is going to look at it,” she said.
FitzGerald-Kemmett suggested members who could look at the project from an outsider’s perspective.
“I will leave that up to you guys in terms of whether that’s the list,” she said.
She also told library representatives that they would need a Select Board member.
“In looking at everyone’s commitment levels, I was somewhat hoping that [David] George might be that member,” she said.
George agreed to take on that role.
“For tonight, I think what we want to say is the formation of the committee – we need to take some kind of vote [for that], and as far as who is in it … we can figure that out up the road,” FitzGerald-Kemmett said.
The one question the board had was whether the library committee would be considered temporary or a permanent one.
“The vote that I’d like to take tonight would be contingent on legal counsel getting back to us,” she said. “It seems that it might be quasi-temporary, although it’s going to be protracted. so it’s not a hit-and run committee. It’s not a one-issue committee, if you will.”
She suggested forming the building committee to the extent that legal counsel as well a vote to getting back to us and tells us whether we need to put it on the Town Meeting warrant, and if not, reassuring the board it has taken the action it need to.
Stolfer said Hickey’s agreeing to serve on the committee was especially helpful, since – as superintendent-director of SST, which is also involved in a building project involving a state funding authority – he has just completed many similar pre-construction work.
“I’m looking forward to it, and I want to help out,” Hickey said.
“We have to choose a site, they will do schematic designs, they’ll be looking at our library building program that we had to submit grant application,” Stolfer said. “It really lays out the kind of features the library should have, using that document to come up with a design.”
Site visits would also be included in the RFP.

HANSON – Members of the Finance Committee met with the Select Board on Tuesday, March 11 to brief the board on the budget they are looking to approve as a group, according to Finance Chair Kevin Sullivan,
“There’s a little more information in here than you all are probably aware of,” Sullivan said. “We’re trying to build a case for where we’re going in FY ’26.”
He said his goal, as always was to paint the picture of where town finances are in the current fiscal year, using numbers from either the Department of Revenue Office of Local Services or Town Accountant Eric Kinsherf.
The overall FY 2026 budget of $39,186,078 is showing roughly a $3 million deficit, including a 10-percent assessment increase from the school district. Kinsherf had pinpointed the deficit at $2,9 million on Feb. 25.
It would move the fire chief’s request for $348,000 to add personnel back into a budget line, for example.
“We’re increasing an average of 6 percent each year for the last five years,” Sullivan said. “However, it’s a 37-percent increase from FY ’21 to FY ’26.”
He characterized that kind of jump in the budget within five years is “pretty severe.”
Select Board Chair Laura FitzGerald-Kemmett asked what portion of that increase was attributable to the school district. Sullivan replied, “a significant portion.”
Hanson’s general government budget for FY 2026 is up by 11 percent. Public safety budgets increased by 10 percent. Education is up by 9 percent overall, but 10 percent came from WHRSD and South Shore Tech showed a 4-percent decrease. The Board of Health budget increased by 24 percent in the salary line.
“We haven’t gotten to the bottom of it yet,” Sullivan said. “This is kind of the raw numbers. … I was shocked to see some of these in double digits.”
Recreation, however, continues to be in the red.
“They are no longer self-sufficient, they are no longer turning a profit … so that will be a hit to us, combined with an estimated deficit at the transfer station of $130,000,” Sullivan said. But that figure is not included in the 24-percent increase in the Board of Health budget.
“You can tack that number [$130,000] in as well, and it will look even worse,” he said.
While the Finance Committee has not officially voted on it, Sullivan said the general consensus of the committee is that the town should seek a $3 million override to close the operational budget deficit.
Based on a property valuation of $515,000, it would increase the tax rate by $752 per year. Hard numbers for all home values are on the Finance Committee page on the town’s website (hanson-ma.gov).
“That $3 million would include everything operational,” he said. “It would include bringing another shift of the Fure Department on board, it would keep everyone on the hours that were restored in October … the $3 million would cover everything. … It doesn’t prioritize one department over the rest.”
Kinsherf said the recommendation was “right on point,” reflecting modest improvement in the town’s fiscal situation and staffing levels.
“We’ve still asked people to put in austerity measures,” said FitzGerald-Kemmett. “It’s not like we’re in a spending spree, but it does allow growth in areas that we’ve identified that we need.”
Select Board Vice Chair Ann Rein asked what increase was being allowed for the school department.
Sullivan said a 10-percent school increase was calculated for W-H schools.
“And I’m planning for the worst,” he said. “We have had no luck in negotiating that number down.”
Revenue snapshot
Looking at incoming funds, Sullivan reminded the board that 93 percent of the town’s revenue comes from taxes. If you add personal property [excise taxes] that figure rises to about 95 percent.
“Commercial-industrial taxes account for very little in this town,” he said. “We always look for these mystery piles of money. They don’t exist, other than the value of your house.”
There is no new growth, and Sullivan said it is actually down slightly.
The average single family tax bill in Hanson increased by 12 percent in FY ’20 through ’22, that was the override passed at the time. It’s actually currently decreasing, according to Sullivan, who said “the increase is getting less.”
“I look at this as how are we keeping pace,” he said. “We’re great at keeping our taxes low, because we’re under the Prop 2.5 levy, the levy restricts us, we can only raise taxes that amount – it’s sort of this interesting shell game that you can go play with the assessors and the collectors, and they say, ‘We adjust the rate based on where you are.”
Where free cash is concerned, the town uses about 20 percent of certified free cash, but since FY ’23, use of free cash levels have steadily increased, Sullivan said.
“Historically we have used it for capital expenditures, articles. The things that a small town doesn’t have the money to do generally,” he said. “We buy police cruisers, we pay for conservation, we do all the stuff that our budget doesn’t let us do.”
Sullivan, who is vice president of the Association of Town Finance Committees, said he has been arguing with his peers to change the term “free cash.”
“We’ve got to work to change it, because it gives people a false sense of hope,” he said. “You want to save that ‘free cash’ so you can buy those police cruisers.”
Rein compared it to the “Peanuts” storyline of Lucy pulling the football away.
“But here it’s like putting the football back,” she said. “I wish we could not have that roller coaster.”
But Hanson has hit a point where it’s not sustainable as town expenses grow exponentially, according to Sullivan.
In FY ’24-25 the town used almost 135 percent of the previous use of free cash.
“We’re lucky that we had it,” he said. “We’re not going to have it always. There’s a limit – there’s an end and we’ve been lucky that the town accountant’s found some sources to load back to free cash. … Free cash can be a crutch for a lot of small towns.”
Select Board member Joe Weeks said the Finance presentation was great, because it shows people what the situation is.
“Statistics can be scary if you don’t know what they’re made of,” he said. “The more information, the more data that we can get out there, the more people can make an informed decision.”
“I think this puts us on a good footing for the future,” Sullivan said.
FitzGerald-Kemmett agreed.
“Perhaps we’ll even see some modest growth,” she said, noting that the Finance Committee has been meeting with department heads and vetting their requests against what their needs are.
“The majority of the Finance Committee is not thrilled about higher taxes,” Sullivan said. “We’re not higher tax people, we’re just coming to a point where we’re going to be hitting a wall.”
Budget survey
Town Administrator Lisa Green said a survey is being conducted through the town’s engaging of Bridgewater State University, focusing on the town budget and override. A link to the survey is available on the town website budget page (hansonbudget.com).
“As people answer the survey and submit them, BSU graduate students will be tallying the responses,” Green said. “This is really going to give us a taste of where the appetite is in the town.”
Paper copies of the survey will be available at Town Hall and will be mailed to residents at the expense of Bridgewater State.