After meeting with Select Board and/or Finance Committee members from Whitman and Hanson during the previous week, district officials painted another gloomy picture of the school year to come without an operational override for both town and school budgets.
“No matter what, Whitman needs $2.4 million to balance for next year,” Superintendent of Schools Jeff Szymaniak reported to the School Committee at its Wednesday, March 26 meeting.
“Without that override in Whitman the number is very sobering to us,” Szymaniak said.
The overall WHRSD proposal, after all, is $66,306,206 at a 5.6 percent increase – the contingency budget, based on current figures without an override, would be $64,306,274 or a 2.19 percent – a $2 million reduction.
“Based on the budget we received from Whitman … in their contingency budget, if the override doesn’t pass, we are asking them in our 2026 proposed operating assessment, for $20,982,307 – a 9.65 percent assessment increase,” Szymaniak said. Whitman’s contingency number is $19,759,924 – a 3.26 percent assessment increase, or $1.22 million.
The contingency budget in Hanson, without an override the district would be asking for $16,452,000 – a 9.87 percent increase. Hanson’s contingency number is $15,674,746 – a 4.67 percent assessment increase.
“Overall it would be a $2 million cut, if the overrides do not pass,” Szymaniak said. Who said he has had “very good” conversations with finance and select boards. “Both towns are seeking an operational override for everyone.”
“What I got was, it’s an operational override to exist with level services for both communities,” Szymaniak said. “I’m not hearing, at least from the Whitman side, that there are add-ons – Hanson may, as far as fire and services. … But $2 million is breathtaking to start.”
Committee chair Beth Stafford echoed Szymaniak’s observations about the across-the-board cuts Whitman was expecting would be necessary if the override failed.
“It certainly was not any pitting one department against another,” she said. “It was overall, everybody across the board, this is what’s going to happen.”
While a three-year Whitman spending package would carry them through with a $4.25 flexible number with increments of: $2.4 million to fiscal ’26, another amount to FY ’27 and another amount to FY ’28, Szymaniak explained.
“That will carry us through, as well through FY ’28, to the numbers that [Business Manager Steven] Marshall has appropriated through the Whitman Finance Committee and the Select Board, as far as numbers that would sustain our budget – and potentially add to our budget moving forward, depending on how things shake out with the state,” he said.
No decision was made by the Whitman Select Board that night (March 25), but after the joint session with the Finance Committee, FinCom members unanimously voted to support a one-year override.
“But no matter what, Whitman needs $2.4 million to balance for next year,” Szymaniak said.
“The three-year would carry them through – and I think it’s 4.25 with a flexible number with an increment of 2.56 in February of 2026,” he said.