WHITMAN – It’s all about balance.
The town’s DPW, and the state Department of Transportation, are envisioning a balance of different needs by roadway users for more comfortable accommodations for bikes, pedestrians, motorists and transit users along a stretch of South Avenue – linking them all together.
“We’re looking to improve safety, promoting traffic to travel through efficiently, as it currently does, but making sure motorists are traveling at a safe travel speed,” said Principal Engineer Jim Fitzgerald of Environmental Partners. “The project, in general would [also] invigorate the local economy in that area. Complete streets projects have been proven to really provide a boost to local economies and allow for redevelopment with all the placemaking opportunities to be had with a project like this.”
Visual alerts to the presence of pedestrian crossings or a cyclist in the roadway are also safety goals.
Whitman’s DPW Commissioners, meeting with the Select Board Tuesday, April 9, provided an update on the South Avenue reconstruction project.
Select Board Chair Dr. Carl Kowalski said the update was billed as a joint meeting, even though not all the DPW Commissioners were present.
“We needed to say [it was a] joint meeting just in case anybody else showed up,” he said.
DPW Commissioners Chair Kevin Cleary said the South Avenue Corridor Improvements project has been discussed by the Commissioners for about two years, as a MassDOT Transportation Improvement Project (TIP) effort, a five-year program, in which the state’s transportation department would fund and manage, with the town funding only the engineering and right-of-way side of it. The potential timeline could see it ready for bidding by July 2030.
“It’s a multi-year process,” Cleary said. “The good news is we got accepted and approved to continue the process with MassDOT and we do have an article coming up on Town Meeting to continue funding that engineering and design [phase] and we just wanted to share with the board where we’re at, including next steps and the timeline.”
Fitzgerald and Senior Project Manager Benny Hung with Environmental Partners began by tracing the project timeline from the initial visioning in February 2018 to the present. The firm had also presented it to MassDOT.
“They were very supportive of the project and what it stands for,” Fitzgerald said before the department’s Project Review Committee which approved it for the TIP process.
Under the project, about one mile of South Avenue from Commercial Street to Plymouth Street will focus on multi-modal accommodations that are “safe and comfortable for all users, whether they be motorists, walkers, bikers or transit users,” according to Fitzgerald.
Land uses along the corridor involve a mix of residential amd commercial properties.
“A lot of residential development surrounds this area, but when you think about the ease of walking, or the close distance between residential neighborhoods and the Commuter Rail station, for instance, it’s really a lot of benefits that could be had from this project,” he said. “The project also stands to address or improve – or allow for – redevelopment in the area.”
Safety is also an issue, as Fitzgerald noted there are a few areas along the South Avenue corridor where a “significant amount of crashes have occurred,” including adjacent to the train tracks by the station that falls within the top 5 percent of statewide crashes as well as other locations with a significant number of crashes involving injuries.
“Certianly the intersection of South Avenue at Franklin and Pleasant streets is one that could stand to have some improvements made to it,” he said. “Instead of a single intersection, we’re faced with three, where we are creating additional contact points.”
Among the options there are conversion to one conventional, more perpindicular, intersection with Pleasant Street converted to an access road to businesses and parking.
There are also “skewed maneuvers” where drivers have to look back over their shoulder to merge and a lot of excessive pavement within the intersections, which allows for faster travel speeds and “uncontrolled chanellization of motorists.” For pedestrians, Fitzgerald said those intersections also mean excessively long crossing distances, which means safety risks.
The potential concept includes on-street bike lanes, areas of on-street parking, curb extentions – or bump-outs – at crossing areas to slow traffic and improve pedestrian safety and green buffers on one or both sides of the street.
Septarated or buffered bike lanes have also been considered.
“Ultimately, the preferred alternative is something that will be worked out with the group as a whole in advancing the project to the next phase,” Fitzgerald said.
“I travel those roads a lot and I’m really thankful for what you’re envisioning,” Kowalski said.
Vice Chair Dan Salvucci asked about the status about TIP funding, to which Fitzgerald said it has not yet been assigned a TIP year, which typically happens further along in the process.
“When do you expect that to happen – so I can push for it?” asked Salvucci, who is vice chair on the Joint Transportation Planning Council.
Fitzgerald estimated the pre-25 percent design could be approved by April 2025 and completed and approved by April 2027.
“That could certainly be expedited,” he said.
Select Board member Justin Evans noted the project is pretty close to that involved in the MBTA Communities compliance district.
“Taking these two projects together, it is a total rethinking of East Whitman,” he said. “This makes it a much more walkable community from, really, Colebrook Boulevard – which is already a community path – to Route 58.”
He noted the project’s estimated price tag is $14.8 million and asked for an updated estimate.
Fitzgerald said that was the latest estimate, with the design estimate at 14 percent of construction costs. The $14.8 million figure includes extra things over the construction costs.
Select Board member Laura Howe asked how specific design options will be decided.
“The town is leading the charge with the design and it’s a town-owned road, but it’s also a project going through the MassDOT process and they will weigh in heavily,” Fitzgerald said, noting it would be, hopefully a consensus decision.

WHITMAN – The draft MBTA Communities warrant article is being prepared for Town Meeting but may be postponed until an October Town Meeting.
The 2021 state law requires MBTA communities to “have at least one zoning district of reasonable size in which multi-family housing is permitted as of right” and is intended to address the housing crisis in Massachusetts and approximately 177 communities are subject to it.
The Multi-Family Zoning Requirement also calls for these housing communities to have a minimum gross density of 15 units per acre, the housing must be no more than 0.5 miles from a commuter rail station, subway station, etc., and no age restrictions.
The Planning Board held a public hearing, on the proposed chance to the town’s protective Zoning bylaw, in Town Hall auditorium on the issue on Monday, April 8. That board also met Tuesday, April 9 to vote on putting that amendment up for a vote at the annual Town Meeting or to submit it to the Attorney General’s office for prior approval for possible revision before putting it before Town Meeting voters.
“This would take several months,” Town Administrator Mary Beth Carter said. “It would need to go before a special Town Meeting in the fall.”
The deadline for compliance is Dec. 31, 2024 or affected towns will no longer be eligible for funds from the Housing Choice Initiative, the Local Capital Projects Fund, or the MassWorks infrastructure program.
Additionally, towns that fail to comply with the zoning changes may be subjected to civil enforcement.
Carter added that the draft language had been reviewed by town counsel, resulting in several revisions, forwarded to the Planning Board and incorporated into the draft article. She said she will update the draft article to send out for the Select Board’s review ahead of its April 23 vote.
“However, in speaking to the attorney, we were weighing out – a lot of towns are dealing with this right now – on whether or not it’s best to put forth the article and get approval from the state before we vote it,” she said. “Some towns have approved the article, sent it to the state, and then had issues.”
Select Board member Justin Evans said his understanding is that Judy Barrett, the town’s consultant tasked with drawing up the bylaw, believes the town will be in compliance with the proposed bylaw.
“Some of the minor amendments they made, even as late as yesterday, are to reduce the frontage required within the zone to 40 feet to be more aligned with properties that already exist within that bylaw,” he said. “That’s something that the attorney general has specifically called out.”
He noted that Abington had sent their revisions to the state and didn’t hear back from the state before their town meeting.
“So they voted is as-is and they will eventually get feedback from the state,” he said. “We don’t have currently a Town Meeting scheduled for the fall [and] I don’t particularly like calling it for one issue.”
But he said it was a course of action he would recommend.
He pointed to the marijuana bylaw, on which the state flagged one small provision for change after Town Meeting had voted, and that change was made.
“It was pretty much non-consequential,” he said. “The downside of putting forth an amendment that’s not pre-approved by the state would be striking small components of it.”
If those changes took the town out of compliance or ran afoul of what the town intended, it would have to be corrected at next year’s annual Town Meeting.
“I like the project,” board member Shawn Kain agreed. “I like a number of components connected to the project. I think talking about it at the Town Meeting would be helpful in many ways and the [downside] is relatively minor for doing it now as opposed to waiting.”
Vice Chair Dan Salvucci said he had an MBTA Advisory Board meeting that day and discusses with MBTA general manager his concern that, because towns are voting on the bylaw, that safety issues need to be addressed, especially where it would mean more pedestrians and was told that is being looked into and come up with aninformational safety program.

HANSON – Town Administrator Lisa Green on Tuesday, April 2 informed the Select Board that full approval has been received from the state Department of Public Utilities Control (DPUC) for the town’s municipal energy aggregate program to offer residents savings on their electricity bills.
Good Energy conducted the procurement bidding service and, out of three bids received, the supplier with the lowest cost was Direct Energy Services.
“There has been an electric service agreement that has been executed,” she said. “Good Energy [was] going to begin, I believe [this] week, the outreach.”
Hanson residents are being mailed informational postcards including quotes on savings and rates in order to decide what what to do, or they can visit hansoncommunitypower.com.
“This will be a savings,” Green said. “I can’t give estimates on what the savings will be, but is a significant savings, below what National Grid charges pet kilowatt.”
Chair Laura FitzGerald-Kemmett noted that board member Ed Heal had specifically asked that outreach be done to inform residents – targeting the Senior Center in particular – to get that information out.
“What’s our plan here?” she asked.
Green said Green Energy would be developing the postcards and literature for “basically everyone in Hanson” and said her office could ensure it is delivered to the Senior Center as well.
“We can also ask them to put together a presentation that they can do by Zoom over at the Senior Center,” she said.
Energy Committee member Marianne DiMascio said there is a full community outreach schedule to which Good Energy must adhere, including postcards and literature. There will also be an in-person community information session this month, probably at the library or police station, and a virtual meeting in May. Another in-person session could also be held at the Senior Center.
The basic rate for National Grid service is currently 18.32 cents per kilowatt hour. Hanson standard is the default at 13.693 cents per KWH and 10 percent of that supply is from renewable sources. Hanson basic (no renewable sources) is 13.62 cents per KWH and Hanson 14.7 cents per KWH for 100-percent renewable sources.
The board also voted to have Green draft a letter to National Grid requesting streetlights at three utility poles along Route 58 in the center of town in the interest of pedestrian safety.
Green said she had received an email from Sgt. Michael Bearse of the Hanson Police, about streetlights at the intersections of Liberty and Winter as well as Indian Head and School streets. Bearse observed that lighting at those areas was insufficient to make it safe for pedestrians to cross.
“He has suggested that we add streetlights to the crosswalks,” she said. “ One is near the front of Town Hall on Liberty Street at Winter Street and the intersection of Indian Head Street and at the School Street side of Indian Head Street.
“Apparently, there is one streetlight on one of those poles, but it’s not operational, so I don’t know if that was one that was included in the recent LED conversion that National Grid did,” Green said. “We can get in touch with them as soon as we know exactly what pole number it is.”
Green reached out to National Grid about the process of adding streetlights to those poles and was told it was just a matter of adding the light arm and lamp to the poles. The cost is $108 per year per light annually.
FitzGerald-Kemmett asked if that was an annual expense or just the cost of adding the light to each pole. Green said a 20-watt LED light plus installation done at no cost, the $108 reflects the electricity cost.
In other business, the board, had voted to appoint Highway Supervisor Steve Graham as temporary interim highway director for March 20-29. As it was not posted for that meeting, the board will vote on appointing Kurt McLean as the new interim highway director, effective April 1.
The board also voted in open session to place Highway Director Jameson Shave on paid administrative leave for the remainder of his contract – effectively no longer being employed by the town from March 20 to June 30. The board had already taken the vote during executive session.

HANOVER – Back-to-back meetings of the South Shore Tech School Committee and School Building Committee on Wednesday, March 20 updated the ballot timing and reviewed the process for selecting a project construction manager.
During the School Committee’s regular meeting, Superintendent/Direction Dr, Thomas J. Hickey noted Town Meeting season was approaching rapidly for the district as Abington holds its Town Meeting on Monday, April 1 and Scituate’s is on Monday, April 8.
Hickey said his evaluation goals for the year include cyber security, the MSBA process and students receiving third party licenses.
Hickey said he planned to convene with town clerks in district communities on April 24.
“At that meeting, my hope is to get updated feedback from them.” he said, noting he has already received one request to consider moving a January vote to closer to spring 2025. “I asked if that meant something like March or April, the answer was, ‘yes.’ … so we are anywhere from 10 to 12 months from the voters of our district rendering a decision.”
Saturday, March 1 or Saturday, March 8, 2025 are both possible election dates, he said.
“We may see some of our communities, which has nothing to do with us, decide that on the same day to have a separate ballot, ask the sequence of A1) Do you support the vote project? And A2) are you willing to pay for it through a debt exclusion? … That way town financial teams would know where they stand.”
“How do we inform our communities?” Mahoney asked.
Carlson said that, aside from the usual marketing materials such as the use of a website and flyers, talking to people is the best avenue.
“To date, we’ve been trying to go to public meetings and things like that,” Carlson said. “Over the summer, there’s farmer’s markets … having conversations with people, I think will be an important part. … Nobody can advocate for the project, but we can provide facts.”
“What can we do to convince the state [that] the cost of vocational education is a lot more than a traditional regular high school?” Salvucci asked.
Franceschi said a recent project by Tri-County saw discussion of the need to get more vocational representation on the MSBA board.
The Building Committee, on which most of the School Committee also serves, heard a project update from the Construction, according to Manager Jennifer Carlson of LeftField. The Building Committee also voted to appoint OPM representative Carlson, architect representative Carl Franceschi of DRA and awarding authority representatives Hickey and School Committee members Robert Mahoney and Robert Mello to the at-risk prequalification and selection committees.
The state requires those representatives to serve on the committee approving the project moving forward with the procurement process, which the inspector general has approved.
The selection committee reviews the statement of qualifications to decide which are qualified to move on to the next round, conduct interviews and, ultimately votes to award the construction manager’s contract.
Abington School Commitee member Mahoney, of SST Dean of Students Robert Mello, who holds an unrestricted construction supervisors license, were selected based on their construction experience, said Chair Robert Heywood who represents Hanover.
“This is a process that’s based on the qualifications, but we do have to see the price before we do the final ranking,” Carlson said.
The aim is to have the process complete for the SBC to approve the construction manager by May 23.
The construction manager feasibility pre-con fee range, which gets the project through schematic design, is between $55,000 to $65,000 from the $305,565 in remaining uncommitted funds.
Whitman committee representative Dan Salvucci asked when town votes on the new school project would begin.
Bringing them back to the matter of the schematic design, Franceschi noted that, while they are not there yet, they “don’t have to wait around” to take the project to the next level.
“The basic goal of this phase is to describe the scope, the schedule and the budget so by the time we submit again to the state, those three areas are well-defined and everyone is willing to live with it because it really becomes a contract,” he said.
Now that the specific site of the new building is better known, DRA’s engineers can go back to make boring and test kits in more specific locations to know what the soils and ground water is like.
“It’s pretty important information from a design point of view,” Franchesci said.
A traffic engineer will also be more closely studying the traffic flow past the school.
“So basically, we’ll be refining the design,” he said. “There’ll certainly be fine-tuning.”
Mahoney asked when the committee would see a “drop-dead date” when they learn MSBA numbers.
Carlson said the budget is part of the schematic design submission delivered to the MSBA in August and, two weeks later, the whole schematic package, which the MSBA will have two months to provide the numbers. Officially, the date would be around Oct. 30.

The Whitman-Hanson School committee voted 9-1 on Wednesday, March 20, after impassioned arguments on both sides of the fiscal 2025 budget issue – both in the public comment periods and among themselves – to support the level-service budget of $63,590,845 budget unveiled on Feb. 1.
The figure can be lowered if state adjusts Chapter 70 funds for inflation before Town Meeting. The Committee voted 9-1 against reconsidering the first vote, which would have not allowed them to change the figure later on as they expressed uncertainty about what the effect of such a vote would really be.
A vote to use excess and deficiency to lower assessments can be made at any time before Town Meeting.
The Committee unanimously voted to approve a debt assessment of $251,903 covering the high school and HVAC debt for Hanson and debt assessment of $623,531 the high school debt and a bond anticipation note for the new middle school for Whitman.
The proposed fiscal 2025 budget represents a 4.7 percent ($3,105,687) spending increase because of cost increases, according to Superintendent of Schools Jeff Szymaniak, who said in February that, if accepted as presented, the budget would set assessment increases as 11.03 percent ($19,695,553) for Whitman and 10.20 percent ($15,325,369) for Hanson. Both assessment figures were cerified as well, by 9-1 votes. Member Fred Small was the dissenting vote in all of them.
The figures were brought before the Committee to start discussion about where and how the budget may be cut. But for Committee member David Forth, there was nothing to discuss, and everything for students to lose [see related story below].
Made atfter a motion by Hanson Committee member Glen DiGravio, the vote now leaves the issue in the hands of the voters.
“We’re here to tonight to push this thing forward because we have to,” he said. “We’ve got to go forward.”
He said, personally, he favored the level-service budget moving on to Town Meeting and the community would vote on it.
“It’s their money,” he said. “We’re like a poorly run business that, without an infusion of cash, we’re going under.”
Whitman Town Administrator Mary Beth Carter, in response to a question from Szymaniak, said even with a 5-percent earmark for the school budget, they plan to use $500,000 from free cash to balance the town budget.
“I’m almost there at level, using that with drastic reductions, of course, to what was requested [by town departments],” she said.
Hanson Town Administrator Lisa Green said that, even with a 5.85-percent assessment, her town is almost $1 million in deficit.
“Our free cash is at $1.4 million,” she said. “We would basically need to use most of that. Anything higher than that pretty much is going to wipe out all our free cash and gives us nothing for capital until October. … Regardless of what the schools do, we’re at a deficit on all of those figures [Szymaniak spoke of as assessment formulas], which may mean staff [cuts] on our end, as well.”
Whitman Select Board member Shawn Kain said all three boards are bare-boned and super-efficient, so there is little room for cuts.
“The best thing we can do is get on the same page and move forward together so we can get past this in a way that the community will accept,” he said.
Select Board member Justin Evans said Whitman’s new growth for fiscal 2025 is looking to be $250,000. New growth plus Prop 2 ½ is $1.2 million the current year.
Before the budget discussion a handful of Whitman officials said the 5.58 percent assessment was within a comfortable margin of the 5 percent their Select Board budget line items.
Szymaniak began the budget discussion with a review of where the assessment proposals were left the previous week.
Noting that the level-service budget presented Feb, 2 “didn’t go over well with our communities,” and following cuts proposed the previous week, both towns are earmarking the schools at about a 5 percent assessment increase, which he said presents “ a real challenge to our district budget.”
He thanked both town administrators for providing the district with the budget numbers they are dealing with.
“We might not agree where we’re at right now, but I appreciate the transparency of having some numbers to work with,” Szymaniak said. “I presented the Committee some options for what that would look like if we come down from 5.13 percent.”
He reviewed those options at Wednesday’s meeting, all the way down to a 5.8-percent assessment increase – including the unemployment numbers, which kick in with the new fiscal year on July 1, included in the personnel reductions. If a teacher does not have a position by June 30, the district must begin paying them unemployment compensation until they are called back or secure another job at equal pay to what they are now receiving at W-H.
“We learned that through COVID,” he said. The district was forced to pink-slip 62 people during the fiscal 2021 budget process because that budget – being worked out during the height of the pandemic was fraught with uncertainty. Most returned or found gainful employment elsewhere.
Szymaniak went over his recommendations in the event cuts are necessary, before the Committee discussed them.
To reach the assessments the towns can afford without an override, the district is 5 percent, they have said to Szymaniak and in public meetings.
“My recommendation – if we have to – if this Committee has to move away from the 5.13 percent assessment … I still recommend potentially using one-time funds, using circuit-breaker funds and not replacing five retirements and non-renewals for a total of five positions cut,” he said. That would mean a total cut of $910,500 and make the overall budget – not the assessment – a 4.04 percent increase. It would assess Whitman $19,135,687 (a 7.8 percent increase) and Hanson $14,974,786 (a 7.68 percent increase).
Deeper cuts are “where it gets a little bit uncomfortable” for running the schools effectively and carrying the additional 40-percent cost in the salaries of each person pink-slipped because of the cost of unemployment benefits to the district.
“I had told the Committee, and I shared with the district today, where cuts could come from,” Szymaniak said. “The only place I could take cuts from … I’m looking at Conley, Indian Head [elementary schools], Hanson Middle School, Whitman Middle School at the grade levels. You can probably assume that some of the retirements are coming from the high school because they are getting cuts, as well.”
The cuts could increase class sizes.
Szymaniak said the district has worked hard to serve its students, especially in kindergarten through grade five, which now average classes of 20 pupils and under, and grades six to eight, where classes average 20 to 22. In the high school, classes average between 22 to 25 students.
The cuts would bring the average for every elementary and middle school class to 25 with “hopefully no move-ins.”
He said he had a question from a community member about whether studies have been done on optimal class size.
“Yes, a lot before 2019,” he said. “Nobody’s really talking about that now because kids are different.”
Twenty-five students in a high school class used to be manageable, and while it is still doable now, it’s different, Szymaniak said. That same number, 25, in an elementary classroom was once considered a bit large, but manageable. Today, 20-pupil classrooms are considered challenging.
The district has interventionists, but Assistant Superintendent George Ferro mentioned last week that, where they are progressing and educating all kids, there will be a restructuring of how that happens if there are 25 students in a classroom.
Cuts to bring the assessment increase down to 4.04 percent, if the Committee supported it, would not really affect kindergarten to grade eight students, but high school students somewhat, but he said he gets really nervous about adequately serving students once they go below that percentage for cuts.
“Cutting five positions in the district isn’t awesome,” Szymaniak said. “There are retirements and non-renewals that we could probably get by [with]. It won’t be a tremendous increase in class size; however services will be lost. It’s not level-serviced.”
Excess and deficiency, which is revenue, of which the district is also using $250,000 to support the budget, he reminded the committee.
Szymaniak then listed the effects of each subsequent single percent cut from the assessment increase below 5 percent.
Bringing Whitman’s assessment down to $18,917,397 (6.84 percent assessment) and Hanson’s to $14,838,025 (6.85 percent assessment) would mean layoffs or terminations for seven employees.
The next layer, with total proposed cuts – including use of excess and deficiency and circuit-breaker – reduces the budget by $1,208,700. If the district has to get closer to the 5-percent mark, and Szymaniak’s calculations did not get that far – they went as far as 5.58 percent – because “I stopped there,” he said.
That layer of cuts eliminates an additional 8.5 staff members, but reduces Whitman’s assessment to $18,655,450 (a 5.58 assessment increase) and Hanson’s would be $14,673,972 (5.85 percent assessment). Total reductions in this scenario still puts the W-H school budget at a 2.9 percent overall increase over last year with $1,570,800 – or 20 professional staff member positions – in proposed cuts including the use of excess and deficiency revenues and circuit-breaker funds.
While paraprofessionals are professional staff as well, Szymaniak said he has not looked to making cuts there as yet.
“These are not retirements, these are people,” Szymaniak said, referring to the unemployment implications of those positions.
Committee member Dawn Byers asked Szymaniak if he could tell them what positions are involved with the five retiring staff members.
“I won’t say that at this point, because it’s retirements and non-renewals and replacements of those folks,” he said. “I know who my retirements are and they are retirements in elementary and high school.”
“But, is it a classroom teacher?” Byers asked, noting they could be a school nurse or other staff position.
“They’re all classroom teachers,” Szymaniak said. “I need to have that flexibility in who I need to replace based on who I need next year. I’m looking at five professional positions who are going to be lowest next year.”
“They’re not just retirements, some of them are non-renewals, which some of those people don’t know that yet, so we can’t say their names,” said Chair Beth Stafford. “We can’t say the position because they’ve not been notified.”
She said part of the problem is that some information won’t be available until April 1 or later from people returning who might not want to return from maternity leave or other long-term leave.
“We have to set this at this time,” she said. “Things can change, but we don’t know that and that’s an issue.”
“I’m not trying to be shady, if that’s a word,” Szymaniak said. “I have retirements, and there are some retirements I’m going to fill and there are some retirements I’’m not going to fill. It’s just going to depend on enrollments and what numbers look like as we roll them out and scheduling with each building next year.”
Elizabeth Dagnall, of School Street in Whitman, said she understood the position the school district is in as it tries to balance the budget without crippling an already tight spending plan.
“It’s a gross understatement to say that this budgeting stuff is complex, difficult, [but] the district is making strides that are beginning to have positive impact on each and every student,” she said. “It is imperative to focus on the need for programs like foreign language at the middle school, robotics … as well as keeping the interventions that are currently in place and working.”
She added that above all, it is crucial to work to move the district forward.
“I’m painfully aware that our financial landscape cannot be repaired overnight, nor can town-wide budgeting shortfalls be repaired solely by cutting education or pushing the narrative that investing in our students is problematic while all other spending is justified,” Dagnall said, asking that the committee support a budget that does not cut programs and continues to move the school district forward.
She also took issue with “terminology of a ‘school override’ at a Town Meeting to fix a problem that is not only residing within the school system.”
Whitman Select Board members Justin Evans and Shawn Kain also addressed the budget issue during the public forum.
Evans spoke of last year’s meeting between the two select boards and the School Committee to discuss the use of one-time funding to balance last year’s budget, in which they “agreed to do something different this year.”
“And I think that you have,” he said, noting that, so far Szymaniak has met with both town administrators several times in “productive meetings” since last summer.
Evans also noted during the committee’s budget hearing a couple of weeks ago that Whitman was projecting about $1.2 million in new revenue.
“What I don’t think I said was that, if you assess anything above that number, the FinCom has to balance the budget,” he said. “We have to present a balanced budget to Town Meeting for the town to vote on.”
That budget will show cuts to other departments.
“In that scenario, in all likelihood, I think the selectmen would present an alternative budget alongside, that would show a different number for the schools,” Evans said. “If that happens [we’d] likely want to work with you to present an override that would make up that difference, but we’re in a time crunch.”
The process for presenting an override to the towns would require the Select Board to vote 35 days before an election, which would mean April 12 is the deadline for such a vote.
“To avoid an override and live within Proposition 2 1/2 is going to take cuts from everyone, including Hanson’s town government as well,” he said. “If you think you can live with those cuts, assess a number close to the 5 percent that the towns have both said that they can deal with. If you can’t live with those cuts, it sets the budget higher but let’s set a meeting very soon between the three boards to work out a plan to fund it – likely with an override.”
Kain reminded the Committee of Assistant Superintendent George Ferro using the phrase “moral imperative” when discussing the reasoning behind the use of one-time funds to balance the budget.
“I agree with him,” said Kain, who is also an educator. “I am in the classroom and I do know what it’s like to work with kids who struggled through the pandemic.”
Some of his students are also struggling with the loss of either of – or both – their parents in the opioid epidemic.
“But the question I’d ask you to consider tonight is how to raise those funds,” Kain said, arguing that the best way to accomplish that is to work with the leadership of both towns to coordinate an override for anything above a 5 percent assessment increase.

It’s so much more than playing sports – or the score in the record books.
W-H students participating in the Special Olympics gave a presentation on the program to the School Committee on Wednesday, Feb. 13. The students earned a bronze medal in basketball (with a record of 6-2) and are now in the midst of floor hockey competition.
During the presentation, the team’s Inclusion ambassador, Eli, said Special Olympics was important for her mental health and social inclusion after students on her old, traditional sports teams had forced her to quit mainstream school sports.
A Hanson resident, Eli plays basketball, floor hockey, track and field, swimming, softball, soccer and flag football.
“I like being a part of Special Olympics because I get to meet new friends that become like family to me,” she said. “I get to play sports and have a chance in them since traditional sports are more difficult for me.”
She had tried traditional school sports but said coaches did not want disabled youths on their teams “because they thought it was not going to help the team in any way.
But Eli said her mom insisted she play, so she did.
“It was difficult to understand the rules and [disabled] athletes were not allowed any accommodations,” she said. “My teammates at the time told me I should just quit and they didn’t want anyone different on the team. That had affected my mental health badly and so, I quit sports, which was a difficult choice to make, since playing sports is how to help my mental health and social skills and try and make new friends,”
Eli said sports help her physically, too.
She joined Special Olympics in 2021 and gained more confidence, which helps her grow as a person.
Special memories from her Special Olympics participation include winning gold for softball, playing at Gillette Stadium and dropping the puck for a Northeastern University men’s hockey team.
“I am really proud of myself for becoming an inclusion ambassador for SOMA (the Special Olympics of Massachusetts) and want to have more people become aware of the Special Olympics so people with disabilities can be given the opportunity to participate in sports [which can] help them grow as a person in many positive ways.”
The basketball team’s Coach Leo said it was the first time the Whitman Panthers participated in that game.
“But we had a great year,” said, noting they collaborated with W-H basketball coaches Bob Rodgers and Tony Costa and their players for drills and practice games with the Whitman Panthers.
George Coffey, who recently retired from Special Olympics, said the towns of Whitman and Hanson have been so supportive of the local organization for about 25 years.
“Where I’ve been the most surprised for the support we’ve received, is – I don’t think you people know how many of the students have been assistant coaches on our teams.” he said. “They just show up and they’re really good.”
One such student, Isabel Baker, who graduated last year and is studying special education in Vermont because of her involvement with the Special Olympics here, is in the process of being hired as an intern at the Vermont Special Olympics organization.
He also noted former W-H special education teacher John Odom, who would switch schools whenever Coffey’s son, Jimmy, changed schools, to help him.
“John is now in the Hall of Fame with Special Olympics and I’m going to guess that no one on the School Committee or the school community is aware of that,” Coffey said. “John is one of my heroes because of this … everything he did was for the kids. He got nothing personally out of it, other than getting tired.”
Chair Beth Stafford confirmed that none of the committee had known about Odom’s Hall of Fame induction.
“We’re very proud to have the Best Buddies program up at the high school, and now we have it at the two middle schools,” Stafford said.
“I want to thank you very much for instilling in these kids the desire to become involved,” Coffey said.
School Committee member Dawn Byers asked what age students have to be to join Special Olympics and how interested families may reach out to join.
Coffey said the Panthers are a senior division program for students, but they can join the program age 6 to learn about the sports and go through pysical conditioning before they can play on a team or in an individual event. The age breakdown for teams is similar to that of a youth soccer program, he said.
The Panthers are 22 and up and was started specifically for former W-H students who had aged out of school programs.
“We’ve got some old people playing,” he joked.
“The more we do for you, the better it is for all of us – and I think it’s great for us, too,” said Committee member Fred Small, adding that he would like to see them come to meetings more often. “Let us share in your glory.”
Coffey went him one better.
The last Special Olympics floor hockey games worldwide will be played on Sunday, April 7.
“I think it would be great if, on the following week … the School Committee came down and played a game of floor hockey against our athletes,” he said.
Eli said she was aware there is unified track at the high school, but said she would like to see uniform sports in all seasons.
“Quite possibly it could be put in a league and we could go against other schools,” she said. “I just want to give more people an opportunity, not just track and field.”

By Tatylor Fruzetti
Express corrwspondent
Many Massachusetts communities will be faced with a decision by the end of the year – whether or not to follow the 2021 law to implement zoning for multi-family housing for communities that have commuter rail stations or are adjacent to them.
According to the mass.gov website, the new law requires MBTA communities to “have at least one zoning district of reasonable size in which multi-family housing is permitted as of right.”
The law is intended to address the housing crisis in Massachusetts and approximately 177 communities are subject to the MBTA Communities Law according to the state’s website.
The Multi-Family Zoning Requirement also calls for these housing communities to have a minimum gross density of 15 units per acre, the housing must be no more than 0.5 miles from a commuter rail station, subway station, etc., and no age restrictions.
Communities that benefit from the MBTA, and communities adjacent to MBTA communities, are being told that they must adopt the new zoning changes by Dec. 31, 2024 or else they will no longer be eligible for funds from the Housing Choice Initiative, the Local Capital Projects Fund, or the MassWorks infrastructure program.
Additionally, towns that fail to comply with the zoning changes may be subjected to civil enforcement per the state’s website.
On Feb. 14 2024, the Town of Milton held a special election to vote on the issue and ultimately overturned the MBTA Communities Multi-Family Overlay District which originally passed at a special town meeting on Dec. 11 2023.
The vote took Milton out of compliance with the state law, resulting in Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell filing suit against the town of Milton on Feb. 27, according to a press release from the Office of the Attorney General.
“The MBTA Communities Law was enacted to address our region-wide need for housing, and compliance with it is mandatory,” said Campbell in the press release.
“Hanson is going to continue to move forward with creating the zoning for the MBTA requirement until a judgment of the Court directs otherwise,” said Hanson Town Administrator Lisa Green. “Something to understand is that we are simply creating the zoning, not the housing.”
Green said that Town Meeting will be provided with all the facts and will vote on the zoning changes.
“There must be an understanding that all towns are subject to legal action by the state for not complying with the legislation,” said Green. “The residents who attend Town Meeting and vote on the article will have to decide whether they prefer spending taxpayer dollars on legal fees to defend the town against a suit by the Attorney General’s Office and lose thousands of dollars in grants, or simply vote to create the zoning and benefit from the thousands of dollars of grants.”
Mary Beth Carter, Whitman’s Town Administrator, said the town is planning to put this proposed zoning by-law amendment on the May 6, 2024 Annual Town Meeting warrant. “I found it surprising, however Milton’s decision not to comply with this mandate has no influence on what will be decided in Whitman,” she told The Express. “Once the by-law is accepted, that may bring forth housing projects that up until now would not have been possible.”
According to Halifax Town Administrator Cody Haddad, the Zoning Bylaw Review Committee is looking to find a solution that would have a minimal impact on the town, but also allow for the town to be compliant with the MBTA Zoning Requirement.
“The situation in Milton, in my eyes, only further affirms that the state will continue to make this requirement a priority and towns that do not comply, will be penalized,” said Haddad. “We are cognizant of the state’s concern regarding the housing crisis facing Massachusetts, but we are also aware of what the Halifax community desires for their town.”
Haddad said that the Zoning Bylaw Review Committee will likely present their findings at the Fall Town Meeting.
“This topic can be controversial to many residents who are concerned that the zoning requirements could change the look and feel of a community, and impact several town services, including schools,” said Kingston Town Administrator Keith Hickey. “I am not sure of the reasons why Milton voted the zoning down but will be looking into why the sentiment of the voters was, if Kingston can learn from what occurred in Milton, we will do that.”
Hickey said that he plans to present the initial recommendations of Kingston’s MBTA subcommittee to the Selectmen at their meeting on March 12.
“Once the MBTA overlay district is finalized staff will have several informational meetings, website postings and informational tv shows on PACTV to introduce and discuss what is being proposed,” said Hickey.
Hickey said that the vote on the MBTA overlay district will be at the Fall Town Meeting.
“Hanson is going to continue to move forward with creating the zoning for the MBTA requirement until a judgment of the Court directs otherwise,” said Hanson Town Administrator Lisa Green. “Something to understand is that we are simply creating the zoning, not the housing.”
Green said that Town Meeting will be provided with all the facts and will vote on the zoning changes.
“There must be an understanding that all towns are subject to legal action by the state for not complying with the legislation,” said Green. “The residents who attend Town Meeting and vote on the article will have to decide whether they prefer spending taxpayer dollars on legal fees to defend the town against a suit by the Attorney General’s Office and lose thousands of dollars in grants, or simply vote to create the zoning and benefit from the thousands of dollars of grants.”
Plympton Town Administrator Elizabeth Dennehy said that Plympton has received a technical assistant grant award which it has used to acquire the services of Southeastern Regional Planning and Economic Devellopment District (SPREDD) who will assist the Town with drafting a zoning overlay-type district that will be in compliance with the Commonwealth’s guidelines. Once drafted, this would go through the normal process for review and potential adoption of the zoning bylaw edits. Dennehy said she doesn’t expect a vote will take place until the May 2025 Annual Town Meeting.

WHITMAN – While the nation seems to grow further divided with each passing day, a group of Whitman residents have looked to area towns for an idea aimed at bringing residents together.
It’s called the Whitman Freedom Team (WFT), and perhaps the holiday season is the best time to explore it.
Former teacher and principal Thomas Evans, and School Committee member Steve Bois are heading up the project, based on similar efforts in Natick and Scituate. There is no limit foreseen regarding the number of people who might choose to become involved, to aid in drawing on expertise specific to a situation.
Evans pointed to the fact that he and Bois are on opposite ends of the political spectrum.
“He’s a very dear friend of mine, he’s very fair, and that’s what I want,” he said. “I don’t want people to agree with me, I want people to tell me what the problem is, define it and then go to reconciliation.”
Select Board Chair Dr. Carl Kowalski said both Bois’ and Evans’ involvement speak well of the program.
“My attitude about finance committees changed when Steve became the chair of the Finance Committee,” Kowalski said. “And you, Tom, absolutely best principal I have ever seen.”
“You don’t know any others,” Evans said.
“I know a few,” Kowalski said. “To have you as the headpin on this will work out perfectly and I’m looking forward to working with you.”
The freedom team mission: “to preserve freedom through unity in the community,” according to Scituate’s website scituatefreedom.org.
“This is something that is going to take a while to germinate and to become official,” Evans said in his first public opportunity to discuss the program and its aims. “It’s something I’ve been working on since last March after watching a TEDXNatic talk on the program presented by Jamele Adams. TED Talks are influential videos from expert speakers on education, business, science, tech and creativity. The X in the program’s title denotes it is an independently organized TED event. A former dean of students at Brandeis University Adams is the first Director of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion for the Scituate School District in Scituate.
He gave the TED talk in Natick, dedicated to inspiring others to “be L.I.T.” – as love, inclusion and trust are keys to bringing communities together.
“We’re going to do it,” Evans said. “The more we talk about things and the more that we talk about how our country is, is moving toward being as good as we can be. We can help with that.”
Evans said Adams was not only passionate about the idea of Freedom Teams, but was also willing to help people form teams in their own communities. When no intervention is needed, they discuss ways to improve their communities.
“That’s why I’m here tonight, because of my friend, Jamele Adams,” Evams said, noting that Adams, of Franklin, has been very supportive of his efforts to form a team in Whitman. “My hope is that those who might be interested in helping in making the WFT a reality will give me a call and then we’ll go from there.”
While he supplied the Select Board with some information on what a freedom team is, he began his remarks on Tuesday, Dec. 5 by stressing what it is not.
“It’s not political,” Evans said. “It’s not partisan and it’s not a law-enforcement agency. The WFT is made up of Whitman volunteers and is based on the 10-point communal engagement model that roots pillars of the community, and people central in the community as a team dedicated to love, inclusion and trust. It might sound corny, but that’s what we’re about.”
While not a law-enforcement agency, Evans said the key to the team’s success will be the police chief, a person trained in what is lawful and whose expertise the team would defer to in such matters.
Chief Timothy Hanlon, for example, has advised that should the WFT set up a hotline number as Scituate has, it cannot be affiliated with the police department because of town liability issues.
Town Administrator Mary Beth Carter and Superintendent of Schools Jeff Szymaniak have also had helpful discussions with the team, Evans said.
“The superintendent … has offered us support,” Evans said noting issues often come to the attention of freedom teams through the schools. “He has allowed [Director of Equity and MTSS] Dr. Nicole Semas-Schneeweis … to speak with students who are interested in getting involved.”
Parents, a lawyer, clergy, and local political officials (including three Select Board members) are involved. Evans said he is working to include a social media expert, a mental health clinician trained in trauma and multicultural lenses and a transformational justice facilitator.
“We hope that more people will learn about this will learn about it, respond to it and come forward,” he said. “Tonight is just the beginning. There’s still much more to do before the Whitman Freedom Team becomes a reality, but rest assured, it will happen.”
The WFT is also working to organize as a 501 (c)3 non profit, which will allow it to stay independent of the town, raise funds to finance some of its goals and programs.
Select Board member Shawn Kain, who does similar work professionally, urged caution in dealing with people in crisis, even as he supported the effort.
“Point well taken,” Evans said, noting that members of any organization should know their limits.
Police chiefs in Franklin and Natick have been supportive of their communities’ freedom teams and the positive impact they have seen from the teams’ work.
“The Freedom Team assists in helping our community heal when needed, and will join the network of the freedom teams, of which Whitman will be number eight,” Evans said. “It exists to listen and facilitate discussions for individuals and groups, encouraging people to be ‘up-standers,’ not by-standers in interrupting racism, bigotry and prejudice wherever it’s encountered, preserving freedom through unity and a commitment to gaining new understanding in the community.”
Those goals have been adopted from the teams in Scituate and Natick.
While Evans said he is not looking to be the only person making decisions in the team but he has suggested the motto: “Find a Way,” in memory of the late J.P. Drier, a young man who had so much to give to our community. The former W-H student athlete died from complications of Type 1 diabetes in July.
“The mission of the Whitman Freedom Team is to preserve freedom through unity in the community,” he said. The team will meet monthly, usually via Zoom, to explore ways of offering dialog in support of individuals and the entire community in the goal of moving beyond tolerance to celebrate and share the community’s diversity.
“We’re beginning to change, and we need to change,” he said. “We can be different, but we can also work together.”
Evans said he was advised by the seven other freedom teams in eastern Massachusetts – including Natick (where the first team was started in 2016), Hingham, Frankin. Hopkinton and Scituate – to adopt some of their organizational frameworks and goals. rather than trying to reinvent the wheel.
“Once we’ve formed officially, the members will decide what the wording should be, but this is where we’re starting” he said.
When a report of hate, bias-motivated threats, harassment or violence related to race, color, sex, gender, gender or sexual identity, age, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability or class, is received by the team it will offer a safe, private and respectful place to discuss such an incident, using a transformative justice model.
“We respond to violence without creating more violence,” Evans said. “We are trying to be healing – having parties come together, be educated and de-escalate situations.”