WHITMAN – Town Clerk Dawn Varley has begun closing the office on Thursdays in response to budget cuts to her department, specifically her salary increase request of 14 percent and an operations cut of $16,000 tied to the number of elections in 2026 – a state and Congressional off year with fewer elections than 2024.
Social media in the community was busy discussing the matter Monday night.
Varley currently makes $80,000 a year, and has decided to close the clerk’s office an additional day per week, so she feels she is being paid at a part-time salary,” a post stated Varley had sought a 14 percent raise, which would have brought her salary more in line with clerks in area towns.
But, according to FinCom meeting minutes, Varley had raised the issues of pay disparity between her position and others on the South Shore as well as the “intricate demands of her job including town meetings and elections supervision and the frequent updates of the regulations governing them” during the committee’s annual review of her department budget requests on March 11.
She raised the possibility of cutting back hours without a budget increase, at which the committee had balked since the Collins Report placed the town clerk in the same salary category as the assessor.
The Finance Committee was also decreasing the department’s operations budget for fiscal 2026, a reduction in this line item is due to just one town election and one town meeting next fiscal year. Ms. Varley emphasized her role’s complexity, managing elections with 40+ workers and various updated regulations and legal requirements.
According to the minutes, of March 11, Varleye asked for the support of the finance committee to support her salary request.
“What is going to end up happening, and this is not a threat, this is a fact, I’m going to go down to two days a week,” she said. “You’re going to pay me part time; you’re going to get part time. I’ve been overlooked for so many years, and I don’t think it’s fair.”
As an elected position, the Select Bard cannot make a change to her position.
Varley reached out to residents to explain her stance.
“As a result of reorganization /reduction in staff and salary in the Town Clerk’s Office, I am forced to close its window for the first time in over 50 years,” she stated in a press release Tuesday.  “This decision does not fall lightly on my Heart but is solely the decision made by the Select Board, the Finance Committee and the Town Administration not to fully fund this office.”
Initially, she had included home telephone (or personal cell phone numbers) of members of the Select Board and Finance Committee, but Town Administrator Mary Beth Carter intervened.
“I have instructed the Town Clerk to remove this information from her recent posting immediately after I consulted with Town Counsel,” Carter stared. “I have also instructed the IT Department to remove the personal cell phone and home telephone numbers from the posting, if not removed by the Town Clerk.”
Varley then re-issued the press release minus the phone numbers.
Meanwhile, the Select Board, meeting on Tuesday, June 24, Finance Chair Kathleen Ottina, speaking for herself, as the committee has not met since the Town Meeting, expressed her own dismay at the announcement made at the start of the June 11 special Town Meeting, that the Select Board had voted unanimously to appropriate $150,000 from ambulance receipts at a fall special Town Meeting in order to restore $75,000 each to the Fire Department and Police Department for their fiscal 2026 budget.
Not only was that decision last-minute, there was no time to communicate it to the committee because of that, leading to “a great deal of consternation” among Finance Committee members.
“On May 17, the voters of Whitman voted overwhelmingly to reject a Proposition 2.5 override of $2 million,” she said. “The result left us with a $2,053,431 deficit that needed to be closed.”
The decision was then made to split the deficit – with the town paying 48 percent and the schools picking up the tab for the remaining 52 percent, which translated to $98,000 paid by the town and $1,064,000 by the school district.
“The town proceeded to close the gap by using $340,000 in free cash to pay OPEB and Plymouth County retirement, which we all knew about ahead of time,” she noted. “Now, this proposal to use $150,000 in projected fiscal 2026 ambulance receipts results in a deficit to the town of not the $988,000, but $498,665.”
Recalculating the deficit translates into a 32 percent debt deficit handled by the town and 68 percent handled by the W-H Regional School District.
“[That’s not the 68 to 48 that we agreed on prior to Town Meeting,” Ottina said. “Whitman-Hanson voted to cut the assessment by the $1,064,000 that we asked them to,” she said. “We aksed them to. They didn’t have to. We all know how we fund regional schools. They cooperated with us. I anticipate that future W-H school budget votes will not be so cooperative,” because this is not fair.”
In three public forums prior to May 17, residents were told that a failed override would lead to cuts to police, fire, DPW, Town Hall, Library and the schools and the voters voted no.
“I sympathize with the Police and Fire departments,” Ottina said. “I don’t want to see them undermanned. I do not want to see citizens’ health and safety jeopardized, but if voters do not realize the impact of a failed override because they don’t see what happens.”
A clerk missing from one or two offices does not impact their day-to-day living, Ottina said.
“I’m not calling for dangerous levels of manpower,” she added. “I’m simply stating this is not fair.”
Ottina said she trusts that the FinCom and Select Board will be able to work on Article 2 over the summer and that they can arrive at a solution that is “as fair as a $2 million deficit can be.”
While Select Board member Shawn Kain said he obviously respects Ottina’s opinion [see guest column, page 7] he sees a difference between a $2 million deficit and how it’s spread out so services that have to be cut are evenly distributed.
The view at Town Meeting was likely that most of the revenue was going to the schools and very little was going to public safety.
“I feel the difference in those perspectives is where we feel the big rift in our community,” Kain said noting that how funds are distributed in ways that are both equitable and do the least harm is difficult. “Just going back to the drawing board early and thinking about strategies, I think, would be helpful.”

The School Committee has voted in favor of a new schedule of sports user fees at Whitman-Hanson Regional High School.
“We still don’t have a budget,” said Superintendent of Schools Jeff Szymaniak, filling in for Athletic Director Bob Rodgers who was away in Las Vegas at a poker tournament that had long been planned, to speak for the Athletics Department.
“I told him, if he wins, he’s going to solve our problems today,” he said.
Szymaniak and Rodgers had been in close contact on the issue all week, and Rodgers had drafted a proposal that is outdated already.
“[That’s] because we worked on a new proposal … to lower that fee structure” between Monday, June 16 and the School Committee meeting on Wednesday, June 18. “It’s higher than it was, but more amenable, I think, in a bad situation.”
To balance the budget, Szymaniak encouraged the School Committee to approve the proposal he and Rodgers drafted that increases sports user fees for this year, with the plea made by Rodgers in a phone call that morning – “if the budget looks better, we want to reduce those fees.”
“I hope,” Symaniak had replied, knowing there are more retirements scheduled for next year, “and, if we can get ahead of the game, we will.”
Hanson’s special Town Meeting was slated for 6:30 p.m. Wednesday, June 25 in the Dr. John F. McEwan Performing Arts Center at WHRHS.
“It’s imperative. Imperative, imperative that we get a quorum and hopefully pass a budget, so [Business Services Manager Stephen Marshall] doesn’t have to fill out umpteen documents for the state before July 1,” Szymaniak said.
“The user fee proposal, although not great, is different from the $500,” he said.
When we were looking at $500 and still reducing the athletics budget by $250,000 … but through some fund-raising and what Mr. Rodgers thinks we can do, based on students, I’m looking at a $375 first sport, $250 for a second and $100 for a third, with a family cap of $1,200.”
Fees are not delineated based on how much or whether they are a money-maker for the school, Szymakiak said.
“That’s not something we’ve done since user fees were enacted, except for the sports that are more expensive – which is hockey,” he said.
Ice hockey will go from $200 to $400 for varsity players only and the “outrageous cost of ice time right now might even still minimize the amount of ice time they can purchase,” Szymaniak said. “That [fee structure] should get him close to that $250,000 without cutting any sports. We won’t really know that until [Athletics First Night] and we can get some enrollment numbers.”
If a certain enrollment in sports is not reached by then, it is up to Rodgers to figure out how the district is going to run certain sport – similar to the way some sports were eliminated from the budget in 2008.
“We don’t want to do that,” Szymaniak said. “I think sports are invaluable. Everything extra curricular in our district is invaluable for our students that don’t love academics – that don’t love coming to school. … We want to minimize the cost, but there has to be an impact felt district-wide due to the lack of an override and the fact that, right now, we’re looking at a $1.75 million deficit from the proposed budget.”
But, Szymaniak warned, if the district goes on a 1/12 budget, all sports are of the table for September.
“I can’t have a football team when I’m going to RIF another 24 teachers,” he said. “I’ve heard, and I’m sure members around this table have heard, ‘You’ll just figure it out anyway, There won’t be any real cuts.’ This is real. $1.7 million is real. Last year was $1 million. We got by – by using some free cash and some different things, but we got by. This year, I can’t get by.”
“I hate this,” said member Glen DiGravio. “This stinks, it absolutely stinks, but it’s the position we’re in. … but, it’s like Hillary said, if we’re going to be the bad guy and do this, we have to be the bad guy the whole way through, because there has to be consequences to pay.”
He said that, if kids think they can get away without paying, no one is going to pay. But he also argued for hardship provisions as well as more fundraising avenues, such as an always open dedicated GoFundMe account.
“As bad as this is, I do think there are ways to get through this,” DiGravio said, adding he was willing to donate right away.
Member Stephanie Blackman also had some suggestions, such as intramural rather than freshman sports, and allowing sponsorships of teams.
Rodgers also wants to establish his own kind of scholarship program for students who can’t afford to pay a user fee or can’t work out a way to work it off. There also some residents who have donated money in the past toward the scoreboard or other needs.
Vice Chair Hillary Kniffen said the district should require that scholarship funds be deposited in an interest-bearing account with students only provided with partial scholarships.
“You’re going to wipe out that scholarship fund,” she said if scholarships paid user fees in full. She also said a payment plan has to be signed off on before a student goes out for a sport.
She also suggested a fee structure that takes into account that sports like football are more expensive than those like cross-country. Szymaniak pointed out that football also brings in revenue for the school and the fee structure takes that into account.
Jennifer Roback, 879 Bedford St., Whitman, speaking during the public forum about sports user fees.
“I’m deeply concerned about the recent cuts approved at Town Meeting,” she said. “While I understand the town has spoken, I continue to struggle over the way education is weighed against other departments in this town. Education is not simply another line on the balance sheet, it is the foundation of our children’s future.”
Highly qualified teachers, not software or other “minute-fillers” are decisions of long-term consequences, not short-term inconveniences she said, noting that she is the parent of a special education student as well as one enrolled in the high school’s Pathways Program and a third in elementary school.
“I understand that we all rely on vital services like emergency response and public safety, but cuts to education affect far more than the moment in time that may affect an entire generation of students,” she said, also expressing dismay that $500 user fees per activity are being considered, arguing that such a move puts undue pressure on working families.
“For many students, [sports] are a pathway to scholarships and college opportunities,” she said.
“What’s more troubling is this fee applies only to students attending our district,” Roback said. “While those who attend [South Shore Tech] or the [vocational-agricultural schools] are not asked to make comparable fees. Why is that?” She charged that it not only inequitable, it’s unfair and advocated renegotiating regional agreements with vocational schools is necessary to make sure W-H students “are not placed at a disadvantage simply for staying in our own schools.”
“We risk creating a system, where only families with the means, can afford to let their children thrive,” Roback said.
Asked this week about student fees at South Shore Tech, Superintendent-Director Dr. Thomas J. Hickey said his students already pay for uniforms for classes, exploratory shops and their ultimate shop choice, as well as work boots and some tools – the cost of which is why some unions or employers award tool scholarships to seniors joining their ranks or workplace.
Sports user fees are also under study at SST, “possibly as a proposal in our fiscal ’27 budget, in part because we’ll be entering a time period that we’re going to have increased costs because we’re going to lose access to all of our playing fields [as the new building is constructed],” Hickey said. “We’re going to have to do more off-campus, away travel.”
While it is not a done deal, Hickey said it is something he is looking into. With more towns joining the SST region, it also helps decrease assessments to Whitman and Hanson as their SST enrollment drops a bit – but more towns could also mean more sports participation as the school will be faced with stretching dollars.
“It’s probably going to mean we’re going to need some sort of fee structure to be able to add more programming, or other needs.” he said. “We’ve had costs that are just part of being a vocational student, but now we may need to keep that structure and possibly have a sports fee structure, as well.”
Whitman Finance Committee Chair Kathleen Ottina also spoke during the public forum, thanking them for the difficult work they did in helping come up with a balanced budget for the towns.
“Having grandchildren in the system, I am devastated by the cuts in the classroom, especially the interventionists who have been eliminated,” Ottina said. “I’m also concerned about the user fees, but I want to acknowledge the hard decision that you folks made, whether you voted for or against the budget cuts.”

WHITMAN –The budget is balanced, but the town’s free cash account is a little worse for wear [see related story] after Whitman’s special Town Meeting on Wednesday, June 11. Hanson takes its turn at settling the school budget next – the town budget was already approved, both with and without an override at the May 5 Town Meeting.
Hanson has set its special Town Meeting on the school district assessment for 6:30 p.m., Wednesday, June 25 at Whitman-Hanson Regional High School. The location had to be changed because the Hanson Middle School auditorium has been booked for a dance recital that evening.
Whitman’s special Town Meeting began its business June 11 with 117 voters. A quorum of 100 was required.
Select Board and budget working group member Shawn Kain updated Town Meeting on a discussion held during a meeting of the board before Town Meeting convened.
“I’m unhappy with the way public safety kind of landed with this budget,” he said. “To address that – to try to take the edge off the cuts to both police and fire [as] they are part of our strategic plan, listed as a priority to the town, it was obvious after article 2 came out that we crossed a threshold that they were not comfortable with, for that reason, this was the proposal that we discussed and then voted on.”
Kain noted that, right now, the ambulance account takes in a “healthy amount of money.”
“If we decrease ambulance runs, staffing, then we’ll obviously take in less revenue, which would be foolish,” he said.
Instead, the Select Board is voted to use $150,000 from ambulance revenue toward staffing for both police and fire departments, while working with the Police Department to look at other ways to add to the shifts where they are currently lacking.
“I don’t want to bend the rules of finance, obviously, in a way that’s going to put us in a difficult situation, but this seems to be an obvious solution that’s a compromise, but also in the best interests of public safety, our priorities and financially,” he said.
Fire Chief Timothy Clancy explained that losing two firefighter/EMTs – whether temporarily or permanently – would reduce the second ambulance availability to about half the time. He estimates the department’s ambulances could bring in $1.4 million this year.
“You could see a revenue cut of $700,000 if we only ran one ambulance,” he said. “They came up with a solution of $75,000 to police and fire … there’ll be another revenue source that could possibly of making us whole in another special fall meeting.”
He argued for the second ambulance by reminding the voters of how many lives they save, “and shame on me for not publicizing ig enough.”
“I will tell you, not only as the speaker of this, but they have saved me once and I’ll be forever indebted for that,” he said.
To cut the two positions would not only decrease revenue, but would also increase the department’s reliancce on mutual aid, increasing the wait time in a medical emergencies due to the reliance on mutual aid for many communities in the area.
“It seems like I was just here yesterday, speaking to the same group of people,” said Select Board Chair Dr. Carl Kowalski. “We had a very interesting Town Meeting in which we agreed to fund our departments to the best of our ability by the use of an override. Unfortunately, that override was soundly defeated at the polls, so we’ve had to do some work between that Town Meeting and this special Town Meeting.”
Kowalski said the Finance Committee, Select Board and schools are now “in a position where they all agree on what we need to do tonight.”
“That’s not something that always happens around here,” he said. ”I have to give particular credit to the Superintendent of Schools, Jeff Szymaniak, who’s done something that isn’t done very often also, and that is to agree that the assessment to the town can be lowered some, to make this year one that we can get through, even though it’s going to be difficult.”
Once again, alluding to his days as a student reading the “Wizard of Oz,” as a text to how one handles change and – in particular, Dorothy’s friends who couldn’t feel or couldn’t think or they couldn’t act with any kind of courage, but ultimately learned they had thosee qualities within them all along.
Voters at the Town Meeting of a few weeks ago, remembered a motto, “Use your head and follow your heart, and act with courage,” he said, adding that this Town Meeting would do the same.
“Whitman always does that, and I hope they do it tonight,” Kowalski concluded.
As Town Meeting convened to complete the business of voting the Article 2 budget for fiscal 2026, Town Administrator Mary Beth Carter reminded voters that since that at May 5 Town Meeting, the town faced a $2 million deficit. Since the override failed, she noted that the town has been faced with making several difficult budget reductions.
Carter also thanked Szymaniak, and the School Committee for voting the week before, to certify the reduced operating assessment suggested by the town in the amount of $19,917,569. to lower the assessment by $1,664,730.35 for Whitman to an assessment of $19,917,568.65 – or the 4.086 percentage – and lowering Hanson’s amount by $677,333.92 to $15,775,031.08 – or 5.344. The district budget will now be $64,564,205.55 – or a 2.596 percent increase over last year, and we will need to reduce by $1,742,070.64.
“This reduced assessment, certified by the W-H Regional School Committee, equates to a 4.09 percent increase over last years’ operating assessment to the town,” she said, also thanking other town officials, department heads and members of the budget for their cooperation in presenting a balanced budget to Town Meeting.
“Every budget reduction that was made, was done only after careful consideration and analysis,” Carter said. “After department expense lines were reviewed for possible reductions, we then looked at those positions that had increased from part time to full time in the past several years ro determine which positions could revert to part-time status.”
Salary reductions made were: see list from last week
Whitman now has one administrative position in the assessor’s office unfilled – in a three-person office. In the three-person Town Clerk’s office one position has not been funded. The Police Department budget was cut and two officers’ positions plus another $90,000 or so as currently not funded. Two firefighter positions were not funded and the building inspector was informed that day that his full-time job would now be a part-time job. The DPW was another department where two positions were not funded. The Health Department administrative assistant’s hours were reduced, another part-time clerical position at the Council on Aging was not funded. The Veterans’ Service offcer was also reduced to part time.
By the time the nearly two and half hour meeting was over, however the building inspector position was returned to full-time in the budget as was the Veterans’ officer, based on the assertion that a part-time VSO is a violation of state law.a
“What is being presented this a balannced fiscal 2026 Article 2 budget,” Carter said, noting that both the Select Board and the Finance Committee recommended passage of the article. “I urge you to vote the Article 2 budget as presented this evening.”
Finance Chair Kathleen Ottina $2,053,431 had to be cut from the budget in the wake of the May 17 landslide defeat of the $2 million override sought to fund both town and school budget deficits.
“We had 25 days to develop a new budget,” she said, noting the defeated budget had taken months of work.
While the town cannot impose a cuts on the W-H school district, she said the Finance Committee proceded with a 48-52 percent split on deficit disribution, hoping the School committee would reduce the assessment to the town by just over $1 million, while the town’s share was just under $1 million. She, too, lauded Szymaniak and the School Committee for the “very difficult decision they made” to cooperate with the town’s recommendation.
“You didn’y have to, but we’re between a rock and a hard place and there weren’t any easy choices,” Ottina said.
To pay the $988,665 town deficit, free cash was used to pay its OPEB oblihgations and donation to the Plymouth County Retirement expense. That left $648,000 to cut from the remainder of the town’s line itemsi n Article 2.
Carter and department heads then worked to producea budget that maintains services the residents expect, while minimizing the number of employees who would lose their jobs.

A sometimes heated discussion over how and how much to fund the regional school budget in the wake of failed overrides roiled the School Committee meeting on Wednesday, June 5 – until Superintendent of Schools Jeff Szymaniak recognized Whitman Town Administrator Mary Beth Carter.
“Today was a bad day, but tonight was a bad night here, and it’s difficult for all of us,” Carter said, listing some of the news she had to pass along already, to town employees.
Whitman now has one administrative position in the assessor’s office unfilled – in a three-person office. In the three-person Town Clerk’s office one position has not been funded. The Police Department budget was cut and two officers’ positions plus another $90,000 or so as currently not funded. Two firefighter positions were not funded and the building inspector was informed that day that his full-time job would now be a part-time job. He rejected the cut in hours and began looking for another job and said, “Good luck finding a part-time building inspector,” he told her. “He’s out as of July 1.”
The DPW was another department where two positions were not funded. The Health Department administrative assistant’s hours were reduced, another part-time clerical position at the Council on Aging was not funded.
“Veteran’s service director – I had to contact him at a conference away for the week – he just started with us, doing an excellent job, we just hired recently, I had to call him and tell him I was cutting his hours back as well,” she said. One part-time library technician position will not be funded and she “zeroed out” expenses and salaries for the park and pool, which means the entire Recreation Department is one person. While the director Kathleen Woodward’s salary has been kept, she now going to try funding the pool program with the revolving fund, but will have to cut back or cancel the Fourth of July events and the Easter events, but has already collected money toward six weeks of the summer program, so she’s going to try to manage that with most of the budget cut.
Before opening to the assessment discussion, Szymaniak had noted that it would focus on Town Meeting and election results, and information that had since been relayed to him from both communities and added he had a recommendation for the committee.
“My recommendation for the committee tonight is to lower the assessment by $1,664,730.35 for Whitman to an assessment of $19,917,568.65 – or the 4.086 percentage – and lowering Hanson’s amount by $677,333.92 to $15,775,031.08 – or 5.344. The district budget will now be $64,564,205.55 – or a 2.596 percent increase over last year, and we will need to reduce by $1,742,070.64.”
The board ultimately voted to support the recommendation, 8 to 1, with Hill abstaining.
Carter urged the Committee to support Szymaniak’s recommendation.
“Before I made any of these cuts, I had already gone through the budget,” Carter said. “I had already gone line by line and cut all the other lines to a bare minimum. When I say there is nowhere else to cut and that these will be felt by all – it’s terrible. This is drastic and anything more is going to decimate the town.”
Select Board member Justin Evans agreed, noting that, with anything less than Szymaniak’s recommendation, he said, he sees a hard time passing a budget.
Hanson Select Board Chair Laura FitzGerald Kemmett, while speaking for herself, said her intention is to set a special Town Meeting before the end of the fiscal year, so the district does not end up under a 1/12 budget.
“This is a financial failure on the town’s level, and to keep accepting it is unconscionable,” School Committee member Rosemary Hill protested. “You cannot do this and say that you’re for teachers or education.”
The School Committee was supplied with a list of 23 positions being cut district-wide.
“I did not name names,” Szymaniak said. “I put buildings to those folks, totaling a reduction in force of three people. We’ve done a nice job of trying to do what’s best to eliminate unemployment.”
Thirteen staff members will be transferred to positions now open because of resignations, retirements and non-renewals or that are currently being filled by long-term substitutes. Positions still open for the 2025-26 school year that need to be filled are an ASD program teacher, a PACES program teacher, multiple inclusion teachers, a school psychologist for a year, an occupational therapy, a speech therapy, chemistry, math and English teachers.
Chair Beth Stafford said that is a point that is often confusing to people – 23 positions does not necessarily mean 23 people. She pointed to the Superintendent’s explanation, but she added, the positions being cut were ones the district added after COVID to help students achieve.
“It really is, to me, disheartening to see that we’re losing our interventionists and some of the position teachers,” she said. Library aides being cut at the two middle schools was also had because they hadn’t had a librarian for years. The WIN (What I Need) program, too, has been successful at the high school has also helped improve grades.
Member Stephanie Blackman noted that cuts to interventionists will also mean more work for teachers, which she doesn’t see as fair.
“I understand the thought process behind every cut on this piece of paper,” Committee member Christopher Marks said. “I hate every single one of them. … But I also understand that that there’s some level of compromise that’s going to have to happen at some point.”
“There is no good solution here, no matter what,” member Glen DiGravio said.
Kniffen said she is opposed to cutting curriculum and they will have to look elsewhere to cut that $400,000. She also recommended holding to the minimum local contribution the state requires from the towns.
The initial proposed operating assessment to Hanson was a 9.87-percent increase, and for Whitman, 9.65-percent increase. Hanson’s minimum local contribution to the state for fiscal 2026 is 7.5 percent, so W-H’s additional assessment is really about 2 percent, according to Kniffen. Whitman’s increased by 7.1 percent.
“This is not a proposal that’s going to make anybody happy, but I don’t understand how we as a School Committee can propose a budget increase that is less than what the state is telling the towns they minimally need to pay,” she said. “I think that 7 percent number … the state is saying, ‘You must minimally pay this percentage more from what you paid last year,’ then I think that those are numbers we should go with. I think that that’s fair, I think that is not us – the School Committee – but it is going to be turned around to be us, the School Committee … But it’s so important to have the facts out there and these are the facts.”
Because W-H is a hold-harmless district, it’s minimum local contribution thresholds will continue to increase, Kniffen reminded the Committee. But her bigger concern was saving curriculum.
“We cannot cut curriculum that we literally just got,” she said. “Curriculum doesn’t make great teachers, but it makes sure everyone in the third grade [for example] is on the right track and we’re pacing at the same rate.”
Curriculum cuts are also in the works – especially at the elementary grades where the district has lacked programs linked to middle schools for 20 years. They may have to look toward state “free curriculum” which carry a cost for training faculty, so it is not really free.
“I believe we put forth a budget to both communities, we asked the communities to vote on that budget, and they told us where they were at,” Szymaniak said. “I don’t believe that we have a sound educational budget. This reduction takes away a lot of what my administration has done since 2018, but it’s the number I think we need to work with tonight. I fear a 1/12 in the month of July and the month of August and school will be drastically different in September, if we’re still on a 1/12.”
Business Manager Stephen Marshall then calculated two different assessment changes, using Whitman’s numbers and saving curriculum would bring the budget increase to 3 percent variation on a level-service budget, or a 6-percent increase for Hanson ($578,554.23 more) and a 4.89-percent assessment for Whitman ($909,465.23 more) for a level-service budget of $64,488,020.84.
Using Kniffen’s suggestion of basing the town’s increases as in addition to the minimum local contribution thresholds, Hanson would see about a 7-percent increase ($427,252.32 more) and Whitman’s would be an 8.1-percent increase ($671,624.19 more) in a total budget increase of 3.618 percent for a budget of $65,207,398.
Szymaniak said a benchmark of a 3 percent overall annual budget increase has been a district goal for several years.
“Can we vote on that right now,” DiGravio asked, and made a motion to do so for the 3.618-percent increase ($65,207,398) based on Kniffen’s suggestion. He later changed his mind and backed Szymaniak’s recommendation.
“Whitman Select Board member Shawn Kain, a member of the town’s budget working group, agreed the budget confronting the district makes for a difficult conversation.
“Hearing some of the cuts that are going to occur is terrible … terrible, terrible. Over the last 15 years, following the budget pretty closely, this is not good news,” he said. “I think the tension I’m feeling, though, is we could have the same conversation about the police and fire department, or the [other] departments in town and it would be as heart-breaking.”
While the School Committee is confronting a budget that continues to be educationally unsound, Kain noted that Whitman has flaws in public safety that the town must deal with now.
“It’s not something I could support, and I don’t say that lightly,” he said, noting that, if Whitman had to reduce the town budget by $600,000 in addition to what they’re cutting now that the override failed, would be devastating. Right now, $800,000 of the $900,000 Whitman has raised in new revenue is going to the schools.
“We’d have to lay off more people that I couldn’t really justify,” Kain said. “It’s terrible, but that’s the situation we’re in,” Kain said.
The district provided its initial budget, maintaining level services, although not educationally sound, in February, he said of the budget timeline. The School Committee then approved a level-service budget and sent an assessment to each community to support that budget. Both towns had communicated early that they could not support the assessment as presented without the support of a Proposition 2.5 override.
School district administrators and School Committee members were invited to meetings with the select boards and finance committees in both towns. Whitman passed its budget at their May 3 Town Meeting on the contingency of an approved override. Hanson passed its budget Article 4 the same day, however the school budget line was not the figure voted by the School Committee. They passed Article 5, containing the correct assessment number, which was contingent on an override.
Informational meetings about the override were held in both towns to which school officials and committee members were invited. Taxpayers voted on the override in the town elections May 17, overwhelmingly voting against an override.
Whitman is holding a special Town Meeting at 6 p.m., Wednesday, June 11 to see if voters will approve a new article 2, and are waiting to see if the School Committee votes to send the same assessment or to reassess.
Hanson, to date, has not set a new Town Meeting because they have an approved budget in Article 4 from May 5, but the School Committee must approve it since that was not the assessment provided to the town. Hanson’s Select Board planned to take up the assessment discussion again on June 10 and awaited the School Committee’s vote.
Szymaniak circulated in the Committee member’s information packed an email from Hill repeating her comments – with more detail – asserting that the district legally has an approved budget, citing regulations of the Department of Elementary Education (DESE).
If the district does not have an approved budget, the DESE commissioner will place W-H on a 1/12 budget, until a budget is approved by both towns. It would, in effect be a cut of $3.375 million to the proposed operating budget and it reverts back to the district’s fiscal 2025 numbers (last fiscal year).
Calculating the cost of unemployment, the real cut is $3.03 million, and Szymaniak said he would have to administer 48 reduction in force (RIF) notifications.
In Whitman, a 1/12 scenario would increase the district budget by 2.596 percent and assesses Whitman at 4.086 percent and Hanson would see a 5.344 percent. The Hanson scenario and increases the district budget by 1.525 percent, assessing Hanson at 3.594 percent and Whitman at 1.933 percent.
“Tonight, I believe we need to listen to what the taxpayers say and lower the assessment,” Szymaniak said. “I also believe we do not have an approved budget, and we need an approved budget by July 1. To not have a budget only RIFs 48 staff members and I cannot, in good faith, hire for critical vacancies.”
Szymaniak also advised that, if the Committee believes that something illegal or inappropriate had been done by either town in this process, the district would consult legal counsel and take action in the future.
“Any litigation now will stall our process and place us in a 1/12 for an inordinate amount of time and hurt our students,” Szymaniak said.
Hill maintained that, “We have a budget, so there wouldn’t need to be a 1/12 budget,” after Szymaniak’s lengthy explanation to the contrary.
“The towns disregarded the district and school finance document … after trying to do something similar to this last year,” Hill continued, saying she has reviewed multiple towns that challenged a similar budget scenario. “In five different school [districts], the schools were correct. What we voted was a bill … To move forward with this vote means we lost the opportunity to save 24 teachers.”
She accused the towns of tricking the School Committee into moving forward without doublechecking, added that no one from the Committee voted for anyone to negotiate with the towns, anything different, or give a different number than was voted by the School Committee.
“They went rogue,” she said. “This was a rogue behavior.”
Conceding that there are things like capital project that can be done within the budget or delaying staff reductions under a 1/12 budget, Hill said, she argued it would be a choice on the administration’s part.
Vice Chair Hillary Kniffen said she reached out to DESE’s regional governance office about the budget process because she had questions about how the School Committee’s assessment was placed on both town warrants. She said Michele Griffin of that office pointed her to the Prop 2/5 regulations, which states “contingent appropriations may be used for appropriations for operating budgets, capital projects and regional school assessments.”
“Right now, Whitman doesn’t have an appropriated number for the schools, so if we go on a 1/12 budget, Whitman does not have money appropriated to pay that bill,” Kniffen said. “So, if we leave tonight and don’t have a number for Whitman to present at their Town Meeting, Wednesday [June 11], we are in way worse shape than we are right now.”
She termed that a major concern she has, so she advises the committee’s time was better spent discussing the actual budget instead of the process.
Moser agreed that the committee’s time would be better spent evaluating where to go from here.

WHITMAN – When Whitman convenes its special Town Meeting at 6 p.m., Wednesday, June 11, voters will see a warrant with only three articles – a revised Article 2 budget, and two articles dealing with union contracts for the police and fire departments, if they have been finalized by then.
The Select Board in a meeting lasting just over nine minutes, discussed an update on the budget and Town Meeting.
“It’s a very short warrant,” said Town Administrator Mary Beth Carter, who described the union contract articles as placeholders as of the May 27 meeting, before the board voted to approve the warrant and voted in support of Town Clerk Dawn Varley’s request to appoint checkers for the June 11 Town Meeting.
Select Board member Shawn Kain said that the budget working group has been fine-tuning “the numbers that we’ve been sharing all along,” since the override failed at the ballot box during the May 17 Town Election.
“There’s nothing out of the ordinary, there’s no big change, just the final numbers after they’ve been fine-tuned,” Kain said.
Finance Committee Chair Kathleen Ottina had been “kept in the loop” and Carter recently reached out to Superintendent of Schools Jeff Szymaniak to advise him of an “assessment cut” – a decrease in what had been proposed – of $1,064,765.
“In order to make up the deficit, the district is asked to cut a little over $1 million,” Kain said. “On the town side, we’re asked to cut a little bit under $1 million. What that looks like for a percentage of the budget moving forward is a 4.01 percent increase to the school and a 1.62 percent increase [if all things were bundled together on the town side]. Just to give some comparison and a bit more comparison on that … if you took the new revenue that we have this year, for fiscal ’26, compared to fiscal ’25, it’s about $830,000 … of that $781,000 is going to the schools.”
Kain said the budget group wrestled with it several ways, and they feel they have come up with a fair compromise.
“The schools need to look at their budget real good,” Board Vice Chair Dan Salvucci said. “I don’t want to put this town in danger by eliminating staff – especially fire and police. … The whole town is important, we serve, what? 17,000 people?”
DPW office
building
Carter also provided a brief progress report on the DPW building.
During an appearance by Whitman Food Pantry officers at the May 27 meeting, a question was asked about the square footage of the building, she explained. The pantry, operated in partnership with the St. Vincent dePaul Society, has expressed interest in using the building now serving as the DPW’s administrative offices.
“I sent a letter off to town counsel, after last week’s meeting, just to see what the steps would be if we want to move forward with either selling or leasing the property,” Carter said, noting that she had received a list of things to do, had already begun and would provide more information at the next meeting.
On the main floor, that area is 1,980 square feet.
“There is [also] the full basement, “ she said, which puts the total building space at 3,960 square feet.
Salvucci offered some advice for the Food Pantry staff: they should go checkout “all aspects of the pantry building to make sure it fits their needs.
“I hate to have them get out of one place and get into that place [and encounter problems] or it’s still not big enough, or it’s not handicapped accessible or something like that” Salvucci said. ”I think they have to take a real good look at it.”
Any improvements needed to bring it up to any code requirements involved “would be on them,” he argued.
“The town hasn’t made any decisions yet on any direction,” Carter said.
In other business, the Select Board voted to appoint Sharon LoPiccolo as the town’s temporary treasurer/collector.
.

Despite some concerns voiced about doing so before a budget has been approved, the School Committee approved continuing school choice for the 2025-26 school year because of a state deadline requirement.
In the end, continued participation in school choice was approved on Wednesday, May 21 by a vote of 8-2.
“From a purely financial standpoint – well, maybe not purely financial – what I’m wondering is if, as we in the coming weeks are discussing potential cuts to our district services, whether that would be a disincentive for students to be coming in to us and an incentive for more of our students to leave,” said School Committee member Kara Moser.
“Right now, my main concern iss we do not have a budget,” said Vice Chair Hillary Kniffen, who said she generally opposes school choice.
Massachusetts mandates that each school district is open to school choice unless they vote to opt out. Whitman’s program isn’t grade-specific, but is based on where space is available.
“Unless we close to school choice, any student from any neighboring community can come to our school,” Superintendent of Schools Jeff Szymaniak said, later clarifying that students from any town in the state could attend W-H, so long as they provide their own transportation.
“If we decide to close to all students or close to certain amount of students (grade level-wise, we can do that at School Committee meeting, but that doesn’t mean that a student in W-H can’t go to any other school that’s open to school choice,” he said.
Currently, there are 76 students attending W-H through school choice and there are 50 students from Whitman and Hanson attending school in other public school districts.
Between 2012 and 2015 years, however, W-H’s school choice numbers had increased, and then became stagnant, and now are in decline,
“We’re not getting the kids we were getting in 2012,” Szymaniak said, “We’re just not. … When we publicly come out and say we’re in a budget crisis, people are choosing not to come.”
The number of students accepted at WH, is based on recommendations from the building principals of how many spaces they have available, with sending districts paying a larger portion of costs for students on individualized education plans (IEPs) and picks up the cost for severe IEP situations requiring out-of-district placement.
Per-pupil school choice students cost $5,000 and W-H per-pupil cost is $17,500. Despite the apparent cost differential, Szymaniak said there are expenses, including administrative costs at work there. School choice students bring in funds to help the budget particularly in covering W-H’s own cost of students leaving the district under school choice.
If W-H were to close to school choice students, those already attending W-H are permitted to stay until they graduate and, Szymaniak said, W-H is always open to students who wish to graduate with their class should their families move to neighboring towns.
“When they come here, they are our students,” Chair Beth Stafford said, underscoring Szymaniak’s statement that the district cannot deny the right of a school choice student due to behavior or absences when they come to W-H.
The father of an autistic child said his son would benefit from attending W-H, which he said offers “one of the best special education programs on the entire South Shore.”

As both towns approved overrides to move on to the May 17 ballots, there are still wrinkles in the situation that could complicate things, especially if the override fails in Hanson.
Whitman and Hanson also vote on candidates for town offics when polls open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. in Whitman and from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. in Hanson.
“I think it’s important that the people in both towns understand that we, as a School Committee have authority over the school budget,” Vice Chair Hillary Kniffen said during the Wednesday, May 7 School Committee meeting. “In Hanson, they voted a contingency budget.”
Kniffen had said at the Monday, May 5 Town Meeting that, if the override failed to pass, that did not mean the cuts quoted by the Hanson Finance Committee for all departments would apply to the School Committee budget.
“I was told, ‘Then, your budget just isn’t passed,’” she said. “I didn’t make a thing of it.” She added that Finance Chair Kevin Sullivan reaffirmed that was the town’s position.
“I guess my point is, if they overrides fail, the way the budget lines were in Hanson was that [there would be a predetermined amount to be cut from each department to balance the budget,]” she said. “It’s important that we all understand that doesn’t mean that the School Department is making any cuts. We are back at another Town Meeting. We are the ones who have the final say on our assessment and on our budget.”
Kniffen said that left it on the School Committee’s doorstep to get the word out and work to pass the override.
“I think there is a misunderstanding … perhaps because [in Hanson] there were two numbers voted,” she said. “There are people who think that the School Department will lose $940,000, not understanding that then it goes to Whitman and there’s a cost associated there as well.”
She said it is an important point to let folks know.
Member Kara Moser said that $940,000 would directly impact WHRSD because they do not have the power to take any of that amount out of the vocational school budgets, referring to South Shore Tech in Hanover , Norfolk County Agricultural Vocational in Walpole and Bristol County Agricultural Vocational high schools. One student attends Bristol County Agricultural at a cost of between $28,000 to $30,000 plus transportation.
“That sounds like there might be some reason to talk to Mr. Szymaniak about signing off on everybody going where they want,” said Committee member Stephanie Blackman.
“You can’t – that’s FAPE,” Kniffen said. “We would be violating FAPE – it’s the law. FAPE means Free Access to Public Education. Every student in the state of Massachusetts is entitled to a public education that they see suits and fits their needs. We don’t have the authority to do that, we would be hit with a lawsuit in a second.
“It’s a ton of money… It’s beyond us,” she said. “It’s at the state level. How are you letting a school charge this much for tuition?”
Comment from the vocational schools re per student costs and why there is such a difference.
According to Foundation Budget Rate data from the DESE Office of School Finance, part of the reason vocational schools’ per-pupil costs are higher is because they have to pay their teachers more, particularly in shop classrooms.
“Since ed reform, the state funding formula has always assumed that vocational education is more expensive than traditional education,” SST Superintendent-Director Dr. Thomas J. Hickey said Monday. “Based on FY26 foundation budget rates, the state expects the minimum per pupil cost for a vocational student to be around $5,500 more per pupil [than a non-vocational high school student]. In addition, our equipment and capital [expenses] are a larger share of our budget. When we give our towns an assessment, we assess them for any operating debt and capital all in one number.”
School equipment is expensive, and teachers’ salary scale at vocational schools must be reflective of industry pay, according to Hickey. For example, he said that first year vocational teachers are hired at a higher salary than first-year academic teachers.
“In a tight labor market we need to be mindful of industry wage levels in order to recruit skilled professionals to teach in our vocational areas,” Hickey said.
“There are students who are not built for a traditional school like this, and for us to say no to those students would be doing them a disservice,” Kniffen said.
Ferro said he recalled from back when he was a principal there were specific towns that tried to put caps on students that were allowed to go to vocational [schools], and there were towns that simply did not let vocational schools have access to the middle schools when they were in eighth grade.
“That has been challenged,” he said. “There are DESE (Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) regulations about what we can and cannot do and what we have to do in order to [admit] students in the member towns attend.”
There are only nine agricultural-vocational schools in the state and students had been limited to attend one in their region, but four or five years ago that changed to permit students who feel they are uniquely qualified for a program offered only at a specific vocational school. Sending towns are required to fund transportation for those students.
Agricultural-Vocational schools operate under different regulations, Hickey said, echoing Ferro’s point on acceptance regulations.
“In no way do I want to limit the opportunities for students to attend vocational schools,” Moser said. “I certainly wouldn’t argue that a student with a disability should not get the services that they are fully and legally entitled to. Charter schools I could have a longer conversation about, but for a certain population, I think that it is an appropriate [avenue]. My argument is more about the fact that when town boards propose a budget cut for the school department, which is technically not in their prevue that that cut is not coming out of any of those places [but] is coming out of the majority of the experience of our student population who are housed in the buildings in our two towns. It’s not equitably distributed,”
Rosemary Hill said fellow Committee member Christopher Marks’ illustration of what cuts would mean – a child doing a math problem and scribbling it out in frustration, told if a pair, was not given another piece of paper, but would have to take the limited supplies because the budget fell short.
“That was a small thing in a bigger picture of lots of small things,” she said. “Just fund us to be competitive.
Chair Beth Stafford argues that the school district is it’s own municipality in the way it had to fund faculty and staff benefits and salaries that town-connected districts fund in the town’s budget.
Regional vocational schools budget the same way.
During the Public Comment period, Erin O’Donnell, of 207 Waltham St., in Hanson, spoke about the override being only level-funded.
“We need to plan for the future and increase and staff programs in the schools,” she said, noting cuts to the budget over the past 20 to 30 years, which has been detrimental to students. “But, first we have to pass the override.”
In other business, Business Manager Stephen Marshall reported that a short-term borrowing of 10 months was needed, maturing in March 2026, until the final two district audits for fiscal 2023 and 2024 are complete, as two potential bidders for the initial borrowing for Whitman Middle School by state-qualified bonds backed out because the audits were incomplete. He said those audits are expected to be completed before the borrowing matures, when the district can again seek state-qualified bonds.
The committee voted to approve that borrowing to pay costs for the WMS project under MA General Laws Ch 70B.
Committee member Dawn Byers asked what the risk was.
“It feels really heavy,” she said.
“There’s no greater risk here than the bond,” Marshall said. “We need it to borrow anyway. The risk is if our audits are not complete and we’re not able to go back out to borrow in addition [the building could stop]. That’s always the risk.”
“It’s a bridge loan,” said Committee member Glen DiGravio. “It’s a loan until we get a loan.”
The 2022 audit delayed the following two, because that was the year the district was recovering from the data breach of 2022.
Marshall outlined the third-quarter revenue report as well.
The 2024 year-ending excess & deficiency balance through March 31 was $616,288.77.
Fiscal 2025 end-of-year budget line transfers will be calculated and ready for votes at the next full School Committee meeting.
Chapter 70 aid is expected to be $261,516 greater than what ha been budgeted, Marshall said, but added that Charter School reimbursement is expected to be $120,203 less that forecast.
“Every time they give us money, they quickly take it away,” he said. Regional transportation reimbursement is still unknown.
“There is some fiscal 2026 budget workings that include the FY 25 transportation numbers, so as the budget went through the House and Senate, and pulling some of the money out of the “millionaire’s tax” some [lawmakers] have asked for it to help us in this year, and some have asked for it to be fully [budgeted] for ’26,” Marshall said. “We still don’t know how that’s going to land.”
Medicare reimbursement is expected to be $95,000 less than budgeted.
“When you add those things up, we’re still within our budget,” he said. “I don’t expect us to be under budget on revenue.”