WHITMAN – South Shore Tech Superintendent-Director Dr. Thomas J. Hickey briefed the Select Board on Tuesday, June 5, 2024 on the status of the new building plan and proposed amendment to the vocational school district’s regional agreement.
“It’s been a few months since December, when we had a public forum in this same room,” Hickey said, noting he would also discuss admissions. “Enrollment does support a lot of the conversation about … debt share, when it comes to a school building project, and also make mention that we are continuing to work on a regional agreement amendment that will also have a connection to the building project.”
The full presentation can be seen on the Whitman-Hanson Community Access TV YouTube channel, and on rebroadcast of the Select Board meeting on their cable channel.
Right now, the district is talking with the Dept. of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) – Chris Lynch and Michelle Griffin – working on language that would adjust the part of the regional agreement dealing with debt apportionment. It is now a fixed share based on whenever a debt is authorized.
“We’re looking to move it to a four-year rolling average, which would allow changes in debt share based in changes in enrollment, with not a lot of volatility,” Hickey said.
Select Board member Shawn Kain asked if Hickey was confident that would be the case.
“I’m confident that DESE would be onboard with it,” Hickey replied, saying he has heard “virtually nothing” in terms of obstacles to it.
“Whitman is in a very vulnerable situation,” said Kain who indicated he was glad to hear about the amendment. “That would be not a deal-breaker for me, but I would have a hard time supporting the project if the regional agreement wasn’t amended.”
“With Marshfield’s inaugural class of 29 students, that’s about 4 percent, so I’m going to project to you that even if this [number of students] were to remain fixed, which I don’t think it will, every community’s share will adjust down,” Hickey said. “If we factor in a declining enrollment on top of bringing on a ninth community, we should see some relief for communities that feel like they’re at a high water mark for enrollment.”
Whitman’s position
He said there are 43 Whitman students graduating in the Class of 2024, with 31 in the incoming freshman class out of 70 applicants from the town. Whitman’s initial allotment if 20 new applicants and 11 from the school’s waiting list, Hickey explained, with a projection that the high demand will remain even as the town’s lower enrollment share continues over the next three years due to new seats provided to other towns such as Marshfield, which is in the process of joining the SST district and the size of the current school building.
“We have very strong demand from the community,” he said of the 70 applications this year. “Whitman is apportioned a number of seats based on the size of their eighth-grade population – and they fill those in a nanosecond – and then there are other seats from communities that don’t use all their seats.”
Historically, the waiting list consists of Whitman, Rockland and Abington students. Debt-share is tied to enrollment. So, without a revision of the regional agreement, Whitman would stay at about 25 percent, and would be responsible for that share of debt, but that debt level would decrease with a rolling admission, Whitman’s share could drop to, perhaps, 12 percent, decreasing the town’s debt.
“I would be saying the same thing if I were speaking to folks in Rockland, or in Abington, or Hanson, as well,” he said of the other large sending communities.
“Oct. 1 reports, as you well know are the official reports,” Hickey said. “Things can change, but I think we’re in the infield of the ballpark in terms of making a projection.”
He said the fiscal 2026 budget, in regard to just the operating assessment, the general track record for the district has been that, absent a large capital budget, a decrease in enrollment generally means a decrease in the operating assessment.
“I support the project,” Kain said. “I think this is badly needed, I think you do a very good job, I love the numbers. I do have a concern about the regional agreement, but it seems its being taken care of – but this is a big nut to take one.”
MSBA project
The preferred new construction option carries an estimated total cost of $283 million with the current estimated MSBA reimbursement at $107 million with the member towns dividing the remaining $176 million apportioned by enrollment. If that is rejected the estimated total cost for renovation, including major code upgrades is at $110 million with no funding from MSBA.
“I’m very careful to point out that [in the renovation option] this is not something that’s going to happen immediately,” Hickey said, noting that officials have heard the code upgrade warnings before in other school projects. “We’re still talking millions, we’re still talking who can fit these costs under the levy limit.”
He is expecting firmer numbers by August.
“The school roof is not going to fall in if this project fails,” he said. “I’m not going to advertise doom and gloom fait acompli, it’s going to be changed. But I do want to map out a five-to-seven-year sequence where, if either path were to happen, where would we be in 2030?”
The district is now in the middle of the schematic design phase, looking at a deadline of mid-August for the project team to finalize it for submission to the Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) by the end of that month. The district envisions being before the MSBA board for their approval on Oct. 30.
“That will be the first day that we can say, without qualification or an asterisk, that, ‘This is the project budget. This is how much the grant is,’” he said. But, by August they should able to closely estimate the project cost. Over the summer, any written updates Hickey said he could provide would involve adjustments to the schematic design.
After the MSBA, the district will be preparing for a Jan. 25, 2025 district-wide ballot question, in which two-thirds of the member towns – six of the nine – would have to vote to support the project for it to move ahead.
“A separate matter that each community will have to take up would be how the project gets funded, if it is approved,” Hickey said. For most communities that would involve a debt exclusion.
Deeper design work would then be done.
Kain asked about any push-back on the ballot question, to which Hickey said he has heard no negative feedback.
“Everybody’s enrollment changes at some point, and with an adjustment in enrollment, it affects operating assessments,” he said, adding that the age of the building, constructed in 1960, the language of the regional agreement was drafted just to build the school in the first place. It had already been amended twice in the last seven years alone.
Hickey said he was not aiming for a school building that makes the cover of Architectural Digest.
“We don’t want people paying a lot of money for a cardboard box, we want something efficient,” he said. “If we’re going to put money into this, it’s got to be into the specialized educational spaces. It’s a very simple design, easy for supervision.”
Town Administrator Mary Beth Carter pointed to Gov. Maura Healey’s Empowerment Act, which could extend borrowing on such projects out to 40 years.
“I don’t really like the thought of going out 40 years, but on these huge projects it would make a big difference,” she said.
“If that weren’t on the books at the time that we’re making this move, I would hope that we could advocate for it – that the legislation would reflect our ability to readjust for it,” Hickey said. “It’s definitely on my radar.”